Hello everyone,
Boy, is this a timely topic. I have struggled with this problem for a couple years now at SFSU. My former boss did not take on this issue, but the new boss is very interested in the fact that our rooms, equipment such as stands and chairs, and of course pianos get used by outside groups. He just told me the other day that he checked with the Dean of our college, and nope, we get none of the rental fees, as I had suspected. We are struggling with severe budget shortages, so it seems only fair that there be some system of reimbursement so that we don't get stuck with all of the maintenance costs. Last year, one of the outside groups, a local chamber music society, nailed one of our grands with a coffee spill into the keys. (Magically, no one saw how it happened...) Although they immediately confessed (pretty much had to, because they couldn't continue using that piano and needed a new room) and even made noises like they would reimburse the music department for my time, ultimately the administration wussed out and decided not to charge them anything. Their reasoning was that since the group was a member of OLLI (Osher Lifelong Learning Institute) and OLLI is affiliated with SFSU, no penalty need apply. I was not pleased. No accountability, and I ended up having to rebush the keys on the department's nickel.
The problem is that the University Property Office is the entity that sets the rental fees, and according to the Special Events Coordinator it seems to be quite whimsical, depending on whether the group has any affiliation with SFSU, however tangential. He can never predict what the UPO plans to charge. I'm sure they are undervaluing the use of our pianos, and they don't realize what an attraction it is to have lots of good quality pianos in one place. If the people in charge don't understand what an asset having well-maintained pianos can be for a school, they also won't understand what's involved in high quality maintenance.
If any of you have ever received positive feedback from outside groups regarding the condition of the pianos at your school, this is further proof that you have an asset that needs to be correctly valued. I have found that groups renting out the music facilities at SFSU really want to be there because of the pianos. Why not press the advantage? Not to the point of gouging, but to remind everyone that pianos are not maintenance free.
It may take a while, but I'll be following up with this issue to find out how our school will be handling it. I would love to hear some ideas from the list on how to assess piano use fees.
Margie Williams
pnotuner@pacbell.net"We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing." (Unknown)
Original Message------
Hello, all,
I am helping a college (not mine) decide what to charge outside groups when their rental group requests one (or many) pianos. There seems to be general agreement that pianos are too valuable to include causally along with desks and chairs, but different places I know use different systems. They are looking for ideas from other school situations. In a perfect world, the idea is to have money go to a place where it accumulates, to help defray the eventual cost of annual maintenance, parts replacement, etc. Sometimes the tuning fee is included, sometimes the tuner is paid separately.
I know one place, a university performing arts venue that only has concert grands, who charge an extra $200 for each piano that renters request, and $185 of that goes to pay the contract tuner (who invoices the hall). Another place charges a flat $50 per piano (which adds up, for example when an MTA-type group uses a dozen rooms) and tunings are separate. That way, some groups that have casual use of the piano may choose not to have it tuned for their needs. Other groups have them all tuned, and are invoiced directly by the technician.
Any more ideas out there? Thanks in advance, it will be interesting to see how you all handle the financials.
Kathy Smith