Pianotech

Expand all | Collapse all

GH - 1 question

  • 1.  GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-15-2017 14:46
    When and why did Yamaha stop making the GH-1 grand, if they stopped at all? 
    What experiences have you had with a GH-1 in regards to stability and other factors? 

    Just askin'

    Bob Highfield 


  • 2.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-15-2017 23:47
    Hi there Mr. Bob,   somewhere's abouts 1987 to about 1989.  It was replaced with a GH1B for a few years after that. 





  • 3.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-16-2017 08:34
    Impossible to keep in tune for any reasonable amount of time. Sounds good when in tune but...👎 I think it was intended as an entry level in order to help dealers step buyers up to a better instrument. 

    Just an opinion. Not worth much.

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-16-2017 10:22
    That's what I told someone last week when they ask me to tune it because it needed special tuning technique to stay in tune. I told him it was an entry level piano and he should upgrade. And call someone else.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Member
    Posted 12-16-2017 11:02
    I believe  tuned one of these bad boys that was in the dining room of a high end home. After tuning  it still sounded bad. I think it was so bad that Yamaha did a re-design .Do a search of the archives and you may find more information. I told the owner to call the dealer . Never heard from him again

    ------------------------------
    James Kelly
    Pawleys Island SC
    843-325-4357
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-16-2017 11:06
    No special tuning technique. The main problem is the low tenor - it has wide pitch swings from humidity changes, poor tone, big tonal difference at the break, etc.

    ------------------------------
    Peter Stevenson RPT
    P.S. Piano Service
    Prince George BC
    250-562-5358
    ps@pspianos.com
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-17-2017 14:21

    No special tuning technique. The main problem is the low tenor - it has wide pitch swings from humidity changes, poor tone, big tonal difference at the break, etc.
    Peter Stevenson,  12-16-2017 11:06
    Yes, in my opinion Peter is right on the money. I've had some success with voicing down the hammers in the break area and OnlyPure handles it pretty well. As good as can be expected. It's the D3, lowest unwound string, that's the biggest problem. I always found that stretching a little more than TuneLab had calculated on D3 helped. Perhaps that's why OnlyPure does a decent job since it stretches more. 

    I have a customer with a GH1 that I've tuned for many years. I've had some success getting it to stabilize reasonably well. It really just needs regular tuning. Probably every six months in a home is good. There's also a few in the school system here that I tune and if they get them tuned every six months or so they do reasonably well. Having said all that, I am glad they're not made any more!!

    ------------------------------
    "That Tuning Guy"
    Scott Kerns
    www.thattuningguy.com
    Tunic OnlyPure & TuneLab user
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-17-2017 15:34
    Back in the 1990's a Yamaha tech services rep recommended very heavy needling on the low tenor hammers.
    This and a Perfect 12th tuning produce results on a GH1I can tolerate.
    There are worse scale designs out there.

    ------------------------------
    Ed Sutton
    ed440@me.com
    (980) 254-7413
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-17-2017 08:59
    I've rented a G-1 model for over 20 years. This piano has been very good to me. Despite being rented out maybe a couple hundred times, it's rarely needed more than a touch-up tuning, and pianists like it. Not sure how the GH-1 differs, but don't recall any problems with that model.


    ------------------------------
    Philip Jamison
    Philip Jamison Pianos
    WEST CHESTER PA
    610-696-8449
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-16-2017 13:00
    Yes the GH1B was quite common during my stint at Holze music in Waco-(2000 to 2009 was my time there). But then they came out with the GB1 & of course the DGB1 somewhere in there ...perhaps '05 ish...?  I personally thought the GB1 was significanty improved/upgraded (better scaling in the bass transition especially). 
    Anyhoo, there have been so many model changes...pretty difficult to keep up with. 
    Kevin

    ------------------------------
    [Kevin] [Fortenberry] [RPT]
    [Staff Techician]
    [Texas Tech Univ]
    [Lubbock] [TX]
    [8067783962]
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-16-2017 14:21
    Unfortunately many customers don't understand marketing techniques (schemes) and feel that the manufacturer should do their very best with every model no matter what. Too bad..."You mean I wasted $6k on this POJ and they intentionally made it that way?"  Sorry, but "Yep".

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-17-2017 09:58
    Thank you everyone for your input about the Yamaha GH1. It confirmed my thoughts and what others have told me.
     
    I bought a brand new G1 Yamaha grand in 1973, for $2000 delivered, to replace my old Ludwig upright I inherited from Aunt Mary and moved it in a UHaul. It fit nicely and looked good in the space by the stone fireplace with the brass screen but I sold it after refinishing it and practicing my tuning trade on it with my mentor standing besides me. My payments on the Yamaha were half the price I payed for rent of the old stone country house overlooking the horse farm meadow. I kept doing restoration on the house and my landlord took my work price off the rent and finally sold the house to me just to get rid of it. I taught piano lessons on the Yamaha G1 for 20 years. It sat in the addition next to the wood stove. I built a barrier between the piano and the stove that heated the addition. I put in improved central heat in the old stone house but still used the fireplaces and the stove. In 2006 I sold the G1 for $6500 to a client. I just thought the GH1 would be the same or better than the G1 but I was wrong. It appears that the GH1's needs to be tuned every two to three months not once or twice a year. They look fine, need little regulation, but that's the most positive aspect about them. They just don't hold a tune very well despite piano saver installation. 

    Bob

    ------------------------------
    Robert Highfield
    Lancaster PA
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-17-2017 11:07
    Robert,
    I too have found that the G-1 seems to stay in tune better than the GH-1.
    But I am surprised that even an electronic piano can stay in tune with a wood stove and fire place in the same house.

    Sent from my iPhone




  • 14.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-17-2017 16:25
    I had this instability with a GP-1 ...really their lowest of the low...until I  re-strung, rescaled  the entire bass and tenor. It wasn't just the low tenor, but it was all the agraffe notes up to the capo break...capo not as bad. I really think that the wire quality had a lot to do with these tuning issues, apart from scaling issues. When changing out the wire for decent wire, changing one vector, ie the wire only, the problem improves considerably. It seems reasonable to look at what garbage they made the wire out of in these pianos.  The lowest of the low GP-1 sounds okay now, for a home based occasional player, and is acceptably stable. 

    As someone mentioned, even on these beasts, you get a yamaha action, which is a thoroughly acceptable and stable action. You also get the nasty hammers...but, hey you can't win'em all.

    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-17-2017 18:36
    Jim,

    Out of curiosity, when you rescaled and restrung this piano, do you recall what kind of downbearing measurements you encountered on teardown, and then did you make alterations in any way to the downbearing when you re-assembled?

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 16.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Posted 12-17-2017 20:18
    Peter,

    No...this was done in the customer's living room, so I limited my self to living room appropriate modifications. I would have reconfigured the counterbearing and underfelt, but did not, as what I would want to do would be too difficult to do in a living room. So, no, downbearing probably stayed the  same...I did not measure it pre or post, but made no modifications that would alter it much. I did use Paullelo O up through the entire tenor agraffe section, and dropped the tension a little, but I don't think enough to change any DB parameters.

    DB sometimes alters tonal profile, but, in my experiments, not a real heck of a lot. And, anyway, tonal issues were not evident, other than could be addressed well and efficiently with proper hammer filing, and majorly important, by being able to nail a stable unison. Creating the conditions which allow you to nail and then shape a stable resonant unison is the biggest bang for the buck possible in any tone regulating, and it gets my serious attention before any other parameters are messed with.


    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 17.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-18-2017 11:22
    When I worked in a music store we had a used one around for years.?? It
    wouldn't sell because of the tone of the low tenor. Since we owned the
    piano I went ahead a rescaled that section.?? My memory is on the lowest
    6 tenor notes I increased the upper 3 a half gauge, and the lower 3 a
    whole gauge.?? It improved it enough to sell in a week.?? Maybe not
    stellar but enough not to be glaringly wrong.




  • 18.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-18-2017 11:30
    And they did it that way on purpose.

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 19.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-19-2017 19:47
    When I worked with Yamaha, they had me do a "redesign" on the bass tenor break of the GH1.  I designed about 6 bass strings to replace the plain wire strings at the break.  Those strings can still be ordered from Mapes.  Just ask for the GH1 bass string retrofit kit that Brian De Tar designed.  A bit of work, but the results are good.  Also, if you don't want to go to all that hassle, deep needling of those first few hammers at the break will do wonders.  Not the best solution, but it'll make a big improvement!

    Happy holiday to you all!

    Brian

    ------------------------------
    Brian De Tar
    Portland OR
    503-201-5482
    ------------------------------



  • 20.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-19-2017 20:50
    Did Yamaha produce GH-1's with wound wire past the break? I know I've seen 2 of these locally, and I would not say they were re-manufactured.

    I can't recall if there were 3 or 4 notes with bi-chords past the break, but it was much more tolerable than the plain wire at B2..​​

    ------------------------------
    -Phil Bondi
    ------------------------------



  • 21.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-19-2017 23:45
    Since Mr. Bondi asked. This is the GH1 I was working on this past Saturday. Built in 1986 it has six wound bi-chords in the low treble. Also of note are the steel cross members in the key frame which were to my recollection present on all iterations of the model. and check out the tarted up 2 x 4s masquerading as braces underneath. This one stays in tune like a champ but we never get a change in humidity down here in the swamp.

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------



  • 22.  RE: GH - 1 question

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-20-2017 06:24
    Thank you Mr. Roeder and DeTar for chiming in with your experiences. 


    ------------------------------
    -Phil Bondi
    ------------------------------