Pianotech

Expand all | Collapse all

Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

  • 1.  Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 17:23
    So I've got to modify a concert grand that has the capstans 5 - 7 mm too far from the balance rail to the top of the capstan. I've run the specs through Nick Gravagne's geometry program and also have 4 other examples of the same model to compare numbers with. What I'm wondering about is whether the action ratio is dependent on the point of contact with the heel of the repetition or on the position in the key. Specifically I'm wondering if I can get a free mm or two by angling the capstans toward the distal end of the key by 15 degrees or so. This might keep me from having to re-locate the stack forward and moving the keyframe farther in. I've only got about 4.5mm from the back of the sharps to the fallboard so minimizing the keyframe repositioning is a concern. One of the few things I'm worse at than thinking is woodworking so any advice anyone would care to share regarding drill bits and or techniques for moving the capstans would be gratefully received.

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 01-23-2018 17:40
    From old upright keys, I cut long 1/4" plugs to fill the capstan holes (drilled out to 1/4"). To keep the capstan on the heel, you might have to relocated the heel. If you are going with new reps, there are executions which will work, more so with WNG parts. The rep ratio is part of the overall Action Ration.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 17:44
    Karl, more info would help.  For starters, what is the action ratio now, and what ratio do you want to end up with?  Also, clarify directions:  If the capstains are too far from the balance rail, angling them towards the distal end of the key would make things worse, yes?

    ------------------------------
    Michael Spalding RPT
    Fredonia WI
    262-692-3943
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 17:54
    Definitely more info would be helpful.  As for question of angling capstans, it's interesting that Nick doesn't clarify that in the program, but I assume the operative distance would be the perpendicular to the point of contact on the repetition heel.  The angling might have more impact on the sliding motion between capstan and cushion.

    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 18:02
    Mr. Page, I'm really only interested in the key ratio here. The only glaring difference between the 5 pianos in question is the capstan placement. ( And of course touch depth.) I won't be changing the Reps. As to Mr.Spalding's question yes it would make things worse if I didn't re-locate the capstan in the key. My curiosity is whether I get an improvement in leverage by moving the capstan forward in the key while angling the capstan to minimize the change in contact point with the heel.

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 18:11
    So more specifically I'm not trying to change the key output MAR by 5 mm. I'm looking to change the key output DAR by 4 - 6 mm.  The MAR will only need to move by 2 - 3 mm hence the idea of moving and  angling the capstan. The vertical leg of the  MAR DAR triangle is a large part of the problem. To compensate for greater string height on this piano the stack is higher relative to the keybed.The keys and frame are not; so the capstan is necessarily higher from the top of the key. I can't change the string height and if I lower the stack I'd have to custom bore a new set of hammers 1/8" longer than normal spec which seems like it would cause it's own set of issues so I'm thinking about moving the capstans. But as I mentioned above, thinking is not really my forte.

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------


  • 7.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 18:21
    Ah, now I understand your original question!  All that matters is the point of contact between the capstan and the heel.  Where the capstan screws into the key doesn't make any difference.  So if you relocate the capstans forward, but angle them back, you'll cancel out some of the improvement.

    The reason I asked for action ratio numbers was to get a reality check on how far you want to move the capstans.  According to Weightbench a 5 to 7 mm move could boost a normal ratio up into the mid sixes - is the piano really that far off?  You may have no choice but to install new shanks with longer knuckle distance.  Which, by the way, would allow you to relocate the stack without having to move the keyframe.

    ------------------------------
    Michael Spalding RPT
    Fredonia WI
    262-692-3943
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 01-23-2018 19:17
    Set the hammer at half blow and mark on the cushion where the magic line intersects. If the heels are angled, draw a line thru that point perpendicular to the heel. With the hammer reset at half blow, extend the line onto the key. This is a good place to start. It causes the angles between the capstan and rep cushion to be equal and opposite thru to the point of Let Off.

    You could also extend the line onto the key when the system is set to the point of Let Off.

    With the capstan at ninety degrees to the cushion is the least friction, so pick a point for this element.

    If the heel is straight, extend the line onto the key with the ruler parallel to the rep lever support post. I just did this for an action where I wasn't getting enough After Touch (jack clearing the knuckle). This procedure allowed me to alter the angle from 16 degrees to 3 degrees and now the rear portion of the capstan surface engages the cushion at the end of the stroke. Before the front of the capstan solely engaged on these replaced, straight heel reps.

    I have only once installed capstans with a forwards 3 degree angle. Ron Overs' action has a forwards angled capstan.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 19:34
    Mr. Page, lacking access to old upright keys I wonder if sugar pine rib stock would work?

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 01-23-2018 20:00
    Sure. I use PVC-E glue so as not to have a hard glue line to cause the drill bit to drift if the new hole is in close proximity. Will you be upgrading to WNG capstans?

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 20:24
    I'll be re-using the originals in this case. How much under the outer diameter of the threaded shank do you drill?

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-23-2018 22:46
    I smell a NY D from the 1970's or early 1980's?

    If the top action has been elevated to reduce ridiculous overstriking and not being able to check any closer than 1.5", The capstans could be turned up so high there is very little threaded shank left in the key. If this is the case make a sugar pine cap to glue on the key with wood glue over the old capstan hole, and just plug the old hole with freely fitting sugar pine plugs and the pvce glue as Jon says at the same time. Then mark new capstan position and drill.

    I just did one two weeks ago.

    ------------------------------
    Edward McMorrow
    Edmonds WA
    425-299-3431
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 04:09
    If you were to move the capstan forward, presumably for the purposes of lowering the leverage, and then angle it back such that the contact point on the wippen heel were exactly the same as it was before, then the leverage will be the same as it was originally.  You will not have changed anything other than probably create more friction between the wippen heel and the capstan.  The leverage point on the key is a point directly below the contact point on the wippen it doesn't matter if the capstan is angled or not.  

    If I understand you correctly that you need to move the capstan to lower the leverage then you should just move it forward toward the balance rail the requisite distance and cover the entire wippen heal with a piece of action cloth so that the capstan doesn't contact the wood on the front side of wippen heel, if that's the problem.   Done that many times on some Steinways where the key leverage is so poor that you can't move the capstan far enough without it coming off the padded area of the wippen heal such that it's riding on the small wooden area at the front of the heel.  

    However, measure twice, cut once.  Moving the capstan and having it contact the wippen at a different point also changes the wippen lever ratio so be sure that you've calculated it correctly and factored in that both the key ratio *and* the wippen ratio will be changing.  Gravagne's program should do that (last I checked, I use my own spread sheet).  It's always wise to do one and see before you do them all.

    The general method of moving them is to remove the old capstans, fill the holes with either with plugs or a west system epoxy filler (faster and easier if you aren't drilling into the area of the fill--which it sounds like you won't be).  Calculate your new capstan location in each section, draw a straight line across the keys marking the spot and use a cross vise clamped to the drill press bed to hold the key and center the mark under the drill bit.  For a standard capstan use a 5/32" drill bit (I think) with a countersink attached and just slightly counter sink the holes.  Center the hole in the key, don't try and compensate for some weird wippen spacing by drilling the holes off center.  Spin the capstans in with a hand drill and a capstan wrench that looks like this.  Try and get them started as straight as you can.   

    thumbnail image





    ------------------------------
    David Love RPT
    www.davidlovepianos.com
    davidlovepianos@comcast.net
    415 407 8320
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 08:19
    Thank you Mr. McMorrow,
    This piano isn't that old and not nearly as far off as those year's instruments were. Still the sugar pine cap has real appeal to me in this case. Thanks Mr. Love for clearing up the leverage question. Do you know anyone selling that capstan tool? Mine is homemade and works poorly it would really be worth it to me to buy one that is well made. What kind of cloth did you use to cover the front of the heel? Thanks Mr. Page for the analysis method. I'll use it. A little off topic but your suggestions were very helpful last year on the C7 with the odd rake angle. FWIW it turns out they built it that way because the hammers were super dense and thus would have been way too heavy if made and bored to proper size and angle. Can any one tell me what the theory was behind Steinway (and Stanwood for that matter) angling the capstans?

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 10:04
    WNG has those capstan turning tools.  It's also easy to make one from an small allen wrench, just make sure it's small enough to fit in the capstan holes, make some bends to match the previously posted photo.

    ------------------------------
    Zeno Wood
    Brooklyn, NY
    ------------------------------



  • 16.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 11:38


    On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Karl Roeder via Piano Technicians Guild



    --
    Nick Gravagne, RPT
    AST Mechanical Engineering





  • 17.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 01-24-2018 12:51
    One way to avoid thinking is to find the optimal location with a "capstan in a boat."
    Make or find a very short capstan (I salvaged mine from an a surplus harpsichord jack).
    Mount it in a stick of wood about 3/16 inches thick x 2 inches long and a little narrower than a keystick.
    Remove the original key capstan, adjust the boat capstan and go fishing. Use double stick tape to attach the boat to the key.
    Adjust until you get the ratio you want, comparing a set key dip in a "T" block to the hammer rise. Not a bad idea to try several keys across the action.
    Mark the front end of the boat on the key when you find the optimal location. Then pull the key and use the boat to index the capstan location. Remove the capstan and put a pointy screw in the capstan hole, press to mark the spot.
    (On a very compromised action, I found it took different capstan lines to get equal action ratio for naturals and accidentals.)
    Sorry I can't show a picture, my shop is packed away as a new location is being prepared.

    ------------------------------
    Ed Sutton
    ed440@me.com
    (980) 254-7413
    ------------------------------



  • 18.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 17:56
    As mentioned you can get them from WNG (I had forgotten where I got it).  I used to make them out of thick coat hanger wire which also works.  You can shape them easily with a pair of pliers.

    I just use white action cloth of appropriate thickness.  You can check the "magic line" though I don't think there's much that's magic about it as long as you're in the vicinity (in this case),.

    I didn't know Stanwood angled the capstans.  I don't agree with that approach if he does.  The Over's capstan was also angled but that was for a wippen that had an entirely different configuration.  I almost always straighten the capstan (on action rebuilds where the capstan is angled) and use square heeled wippens.  Seems to produce less friction generally.  Certainly the old 15 degree angle is a poor choice.  One could argue for a capstan which angles such that at half blow it is 90 degrees to the wippen heel but I think it's much ado about nothing.  The change in angle from rest to half blow on a straight wippen given the amount of travel of the key at that point is negligible.

    ------------------------------
    David Love RPT
    www.davidlovepianos.com
    davidlovepianos@comcast.net
    415 407 8320
    ------------------------------



  • 19.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 01-24-2018 18:57
    There is an engineering term: involute. In relating to gears or two surfaces moving against each other. It's the reason that gears do not have flat, square cogs. That's the reasoning behind the capstan set at an angle to the angled heel.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    ------------------------------



  • 20.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 20:16
    Can any one tell me what the theory was behind Steinway (and Stanwood for that matter) angling the capstans?

    The point of angling capstans and angling whippen heels was to minimize friction. That is, all sliding friction approaching the magic line and sliding friction passing the magic line would be replaced with rolling friction only. In theory, great.

    The setup would locate the highest point of the capstan touching a higher part of the angled heel right on the magic line, while the key is at rest. At the completion of the key stroke the lowest part of the capstan would be touching a lower part of the heel (not easy to actually see, BTW). Thus the angled capstan and tipped heel roll on each other throughout the stroke. The angles of capstan and heel are geometrically worked along the lines of an involute curve (such as in used in the majority of spur teeth on gears).

    The practical realization of this process working out as hoped, however, depends on several factors of manufacture that must be carefully met ---- action elevation itself at the brackets, hammer bore and string height, blow distance, capstan placement relative to the designed (or overlooked) key ratio,  to name several.

    There is no need to chuck this system if the layout is not ideal (or once was ideal but now isn't simply due to hammer filing and resetting of the hammer line upward). When the layout is not ideal the capstan / whip heel dynamic interface will act like any other generic system. The ideal of any type capstan beginning its upward movement below the line, then crossing the line mid-stroke is not, in my view, of absolute primary concern (not that you are overly concerned Karl) in that it is not always possible to achieve in the real world. As the song say, "nice work if you can get it".

    Should the capstan cross over the line anywhere in the stroke is a reasonable goal and expectation. But to force the ideal at the expense of more urgent needs such as regulation parameters, key ratios, action ratios, mass realities such as hammer weights and key leads would be to mismanage our priorities.  When rebuilding actions, the universal whips with interchangeable (tall or short) heels can be an advantage here. 

    ng

    On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Jon Page via Piano Technicians Guild



    --
    Nick Gravagne, RPT
    AST Mechanical Engineering





  • 21.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 20:17
    That's true but with and angled capstan and an angled heel there will be more sliding between the two surfaces which means more friction and less efficiency in terms of movement of the capstan and comcommitant movement of the wippen.

    ------------------------------
    David Love RPT
    www.davidlovepianos.com
    davidlovepianos@comcast.net
    415 407 8320
    ------------------------------



  • 22.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 20:41
    I am very grateful to all of you for sharing your techniques and insights on this topic. I'll be ordering a capstan tool from WNG at the earliest opportunity. The poor performance of my homemade one testifies that my metalworking skills aren't any better than my woodworking skills. If you should find yourself in my shop and you hear an electric motor start up I'd advise seeking shelter.

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------



  • 23.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 01-24-2018 21:28
    Another version of Ed Sutton's Capstan Boat. However this one I'm afraid is not nautical, but rather wild wild west...as in a Capstan Saddle. So Pardner...You use it on a adjacent whippen to the key...works a  treat. 

    I have to say, though I can design actions in CAD, and have use of several proprietary programs, for an existing action, this is by far my "go to". Its ten times faster than any measure-calculate-measure again prove the calculation protocol, nails a precise set of regulation specs which by definition nails the leverage, allows you to vary the capstan slightly to accommodate inconsistencies in the original key set and key frame...no guessing.



    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 24.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 01-25-2018 10:17
    Capstan saddle...I like it!

    ------------------------------
    Ed Sutton
    ed440@me.com
    (980) 254-7413
    ------------------------------



  • 25.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 03-16-2018 06:28
    The round shank on the WNG capstan tool kept slipping in my keyless chuck so I fashioned one from a hex key.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    ------------------------------



  • 26.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 21:08

    Karl 


    There are many programs available for establishing action touchweight guidelines.  For those who prefer a more practical and hands on approach, sampling can still be a very reliable way and sometimes a simpler and more direct way.  This method is based on the fact that an action set up that matches hammers weight to action ratio properly will produce a predictable front weight in the keys at a given balance weight.  Whether you use Stanwood, Weight Bench, Gravagne or my program (which isn't available) you can boil down your targets to a few simple numbers and some sampling rules.  They are as follows:

    Rule #1:  Hammer weight curves (or strike weight curves) typically encompass about a 5 gram range.  If  hammer weight at note #1 is ~9.5 grams then #88 should be ~ 5.5. grams.  A little less, a little more not a big deal.  

    Rule #2:  Hammer weight (and type) should be chosen for tone, not weight and balance, repeat, tone not weight and balance.  If you are trying to fit a hammer into an existing system, then you have to target a specific hammer weight that is a good match for the system.  Otherwise, pick the hammer first and then configure the system to match the hammer that you need for tonal purposes.  Hammer weight is a tonal consideration. (Which hammer for what is another discussion)

    Rule #3:  Action ratios have a limited range in terms of how they will regulate and not feel out of bounds.  That range is typically about 5.4 - 6.0.  Outside of that the dip and blow specs will be non standard and feel strange to the pianist.  Usually that means dip of not less than 9 mm and not greater than 10.5 mm (though you are beginning to see 1/2" key dip with the low inertia obsessed--I am not in that group).

    Rule #4:  The right mating of hammers to action leverage will produce a front weight range (if you aren't sure what that is find out and get something to measure it with--Stanwood platform is good and cheap) that corresponds with a balance weight range (read on please).

    Rule #5:  The target front weight can be distilled down to the following recipe on these sample notes (a lengthier explanation some other time). 
                    For a balance weight of 38 grams the ideal front weight (actions to die for) is: 
                    Note #10 = 33 grams
                    Note #20 = 31 grams
                    Note #30 = 28 grams
                    Note #40 = 25 grams
                    Note #50 = 22 grams
                    Note #60 = 18 grams
                    Note #70 = 13 grams
                    Note #80 =   8 grams

    ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
    Rule #6:  The plus or minus range is 3 grams.  You can vary the FW by three grams and still be in the range where inertia is at standard levels.  Less or more than that then the inertia is likely too low (if you go under that) or too high if you go over that.  These numbers btw are approximately 85% of Stanwood's front weight maximum.

    Note:  The balance weight used is a midrange standard.  Varying the balance by more than  3 grams in either direction starts to put you in a zone of too high or too low static weight (dyanamic weight is something different).  Note also that a change in the FW of 1 gram results in a change in the BW of 1 gram in the opposite directlon.  Take one gram off the front weight of the key and you will add one gram to the balance weight.  If you're not sure what the balance weight is, it is the average of the upweight and downweight.  (UW+ DW)/2

    Rule #7:  The treble is more forgiving than the bass for higher front weights and the bass is more forgiving than the treble for lower front weights.  That's because the inertia is always higher in the bass than the treble by design (bass hammers are heavier and bass keys also have a bit more lead -- a lesser factor).  So if your hammer weight curve needs to vary keep that in mind.

    Rule #8:  Sample, sample, sample.  Whether you use a fancy spreadsheet program or not you will need to sample various combinations of parts (and perhaps hammer weights) to determine which combination gets you to the optimum level if for no other reason to test out your fancy new program and be sure you measured correctly.  You should also test your sample configurations to see if they regulate properly (dip and blow)

    Rule #9: When sampling if you get inconsistent readings, sample adjacent notes.  Sometime things happen in key manufacturing that can throw your sampling off.

    Rule #10:  Start your sampling by establishing FW guides as indicated above first!!!.  Reconfigure the leading for the purposes of sampling in just the quickest way for this.  If you are going to reset the lead pattern you can do that later. For example, if you want to have the leads oriented toward the balance rail.  But for sampling purposes establish the FW targets and then mix and match parts, hammers weights, etc such that your sample note achieves a 38 gram balance weight.  That is your target.  If you do that and if the action regulates within normal parameters then you will have an action that has a dynamic weight, i.e. the proper levels of inertia.  

    Rule #11:  I’ll let you know when I think of it.

    So to review, your method is to mix and match hammers and parts configurations, capstan locations, etc.,  to achieve a balance weight of 38 grams at those FW targets that that you’ve established *prior* to beginning your mix and match process.  The system will tolerate some variations, as outlined, and after the fact, if you prefer a slightly lighter BW then you can simply adjust the FW accordingly in the weigh off procedure.  In so doing you will be adjusting the static weight (much less important) but the dynamic weight (inertia) will remain relatively unaltered.  

    It works and it works every time.  (Wippen assist springs not included in this method).  Spread sheets are cool and can create shortcuts once you understand and trust what they produce but for most mortals a sampling method is more reliable and will give you just as consistent results and for less money.  

    Good luck.

    ​​​​​​

    ------------------------------
    David Love RPT
    www.davidlovepianos.com
    davidlovepianos@comcast.net
    415 407 8320
    ------------------------------





  • 27.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 22:27
    Jim,

    Maybe I am having a mental block but I am having difficulty "seeing" how to use your little jig. Can you show it in real time? Please!?  😊

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 28.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 01-25-2018 15:45
    Peter,

    I'm not doing an action right now, so it would take too much time to pose the pic. 

    When i do this proof, only 6 or 7 test keys on are the frame, so the saddle does not interfere with adjacent key sticks. The full stack can be in place, but only sample keys.



    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 29.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Posted 03-15-2018 21:01
      |   view attached
    Peter,

    per your request during this thread, here's a pic of my capstan side saddle. attached

    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 30.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 03-15-2018 23:17
    Now that's a good idea.?? Thank you, Jim!???? Clark

    --
    Clark A. Sprague, RPT www.clarkspianoservice.com




  • 31.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 03-16-2018 10:18
    Ah, yes.  Now I get it. As usual, the picture is worth many more words.

    Thanks Jim!

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 32.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-24-2018 22:27
    Thank you Mr Ialeggio. I think I'm going to need to make one of those. Mr. Love. Wow. I'm in your debt. Thank you.

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------



  • 33.  RE: Not good at thinking. Could use some help.

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-25-2018 11:10
    Karl:

    I have made some edits to my previous posts (I remembered what rule #10 was) and a few grammatical errors and typos so please refer back to that.  Wrote it a bit extemporaneously so there are probably some other edits and clarifications to be made but that will have to be for another day.  ​

    ------------------------------
    David Love RPT
    www.davidlovepianos.com
    davidlovepianos@comcast.net
    415 407 8320
    ------------------------------