Pianotech

Expand all | Collapse all

Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

  • 1.  Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-27-2019 10:58
    I have our 1977 Mason & Hamlin CC2 torn down for restringing.  I major objective of this project is to improve string rendering in the high tenor and the treble.  The treble counterbearings on this piano are not cast into the plate, but are shiny metal things that are somehow attached to the plate.  There is some string indentation (grooving) there that I think might represent an impediment to string movement, but I am unsure as to whether these are of some solid metal, or whether they are, perhaps, nickel plated brass.  I might take emery cloth to them either way, but it would be nice to know what I might expect when I do that.

    Thoughts?

    ------------------------------
    Floyd Gadd
    Regina SK
    306-502-9103
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-27-2019 13:21
    pictures?   

    I would suggest analyzing the termination angles, reducing them if over 15 deg and going over metal counterbearing. Reduce the capo termination to a "V" with about a 0.5mm flat at the v point. Reduce the counterbearing bars to a v as well. Better yet, replace the counterbearing bars with co-polymer flats about 3/4" wide. If you use co-polymer, you can tolerate higher counterbearing angles of 20-25 deg.  Don't skip the capo reshaping, as a wide termination is a serious friction drag.

    I leave the string grooves, to help locate strings, as long as the capo is being reduced to a "V" . 

    To analyze the termination angle, draw a series of 155 - 170 deg, angles on manila folder. cut the manila with a razor along the angle lines, and hold it up, under the capo and strings to see which manila angle gauge matches you termination angles. 155deg= 25 deg (180-155)  etc

    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-27-2019 13:24
    Thank you, Jim!

    ------------------------------
    Floyd Gadd
    Regina SK
    306-502-9103
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-27-2019 17:53
    Every M&H I worked has duplex pieces made of brass and nickel plated. Plating is  very delicate so be gentle with buffing. I would numbered them as they are different length from section to section and inside section.





  • 5.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-27-2019 18:01
    Thank you, Alexander. Too late to number the aliquots!  I'll just have to make the best of it.

    ------------------------------
    Floyd Gadd
    Regina SK
    306-502-9103
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 06-28-2019 19:56
    As far as I can determine these brass half-rounds were originally stuck to the plate with a drop of hide glue just before the string was put on, thus enabling you to shift the aliquot as necessary to align.  They used hide glue for everything, since it was what they had.  They didn't have to go around the factory shouting, "Where did somebody Hide the glue?!"  You have to have a real sense of timing for the stuff though because at first it's not grabby at all, especially on metal to metal; it'll actually make the half-round more likely to shift on you.  You want something that will grab initially but not stick the aliquot so fast to the plate when it firms up that you can't shift it at all without damaging the finish.  With all the adhesives we have available to use now there should be something out there much more appropriate.  Something like post-it note glue.
    As far as I could determine the aliquots didn't vary in length within the section, but they do vary from section to section.  And make sure to county them, preferably before you unstring.  Isn't it amazing how these little parts that come in multitudes have a way of going astray?   Naturally I lost one and it didn't turn up again of course till I'd finished restringing and had moved on to cleaning up the action bay, where it was hiding underneath the shift spring.   Might be a good idea to order a piece of brass half-round bar stock just in case.   You'll find a use for it eventually.

    ------------------------------
    Cecil Snyder
    Torrance CA
    310-542-7108
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 06-29-2019 11:23
    Yes, replace them with a continuous piece of brass.

    ------------------------------
    David Love RPT
    www.davidlovepianos.com
    davidlovepianos@comcast.net
    415 407 8320
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-30-2019 12:37
     Thank you all for your replies.
    Only Jim has come close to answering my question.  Between the tuning pins and the capo, this piano does not hae counter bearing ridges cast into the plate, rather it has six counter bearing pieces sitting on the plate, perhaps fastened with adhesive.  If you have run into what I'm talking about, you know what I mean. They appear to be cast pieces, not something like half round.  They are shiny, perhaps nickel plated. If they are indeed nickel plated brass, I cannot shape them with a file without cosmetic consequences.  If indeed they are solid castings of whatever metal I see on the surface, shaping will not have the same cosmetic consequences.  The issue I am dealing with is poor string rendering, and I have identified other sources of the issue,  but I am considering that there might be ground to be gained by reducing the string indentations in these couterbearing bars. I am not concerned about string deflection issues from a tone perspective. We have been pleased with the cleanness of the treble tone. 


    ------------------------------
    Floyd Gadd
    Regina SK
    306-502-9103
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-30-2019 13:38
    what other sources of rendering friction have you identified?

    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-30-2019 14:07
    The most obvious is the 2 inch  expanse of 5 mm firm understring cloth, original, unchanged at the last restringing,  topped with strings with a degree of corrosion, exacerbated by coils pounded in too close to the plate.   Applying Protech CLP to the cloth has provided some measure of improvement, but has not proved to be a long-term solution.  I definitely plan to address the shape of the capo as well.

    ------------------------------
    Floyd Gadd
    Regina SK
    306-502-9103
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 06-30-2019 16:01
    I have spent much time experimenting and analyzing front segment conditions, as to what assists compliant rendering. Although much has been said on these lists regarding length of understring felt being the primary culprit with rendering issues, I just have not found that to be solely the fix, and sometimes not the issue at all.  Look at the entire system, including capo shape, termination angle, termination angle coming off the counterbearing, width of counterbearing contact, materials of counter-bearing, and length of the front segment, which I call the "Stabilizing length".  

    This part of stringing a piano is often considered to be a throw-away, "get it done so we can get on to stringing". But the time spent here will give you a big smile everytime you see this piano for years. Its worth the time. Also Masons then and now are tough in the capo section. This includes current Masons. So your efforts very well could be less than rewarding, unless you look at the whole system and work your will on it, without taking any prisoners.

    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 06-30-2019 17:02
    Floyd, I think they used burnt shellac to tack down the parts during stringing.

    ------------------------------
    Steven Rosenthal
    Honolulu HI
    808-521-7129
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 07-01-2019 08:00
    Floyd wrote:
    "Applying Protech CLP to the cloth has provided some measure of improvement, but has not proved to be a long-term solution."

    Have you tried Jon Page's Counter Bearing Lube?

    Alan

    ------------------------------
    Alan Eder, RPT
    Herb Alpert School of Music
    California Institute of the Arts
    Valencia, CA
    661.904.6483
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 07-02-2019 02:09
    Floyd,
    As far as I know there is no lubricant with a higher pressure rating than graphite; after all, in one direction it is diamond, in the other direction it is a near perfect lubricant.  All oils and most other lubricants will break down or be wiped off by the pressure and friction of the bearing surfaces.  Molybdenum disulfide and other metal containing lubricants are effective but (as I am told) not as effective as graphite.

    If anyone has other information  or experience I would like to know.

    ------------------------------
    Blaine Hebert
    Duarte CA
    626-795-5170
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: Mason & Hamlin Treble Counterbearing Inserts

    Posted 10-29-2020 12:50


    Jim, you requested an update.

    I replaced the metal counterbearings with acetal copolymer, pretty much duplicating the original duplex length.  I am pleased with the compliance of the system, in regard to string rendering.  I duplicated the rather large expanse of felt between the counterbearings and the tuning pins, but with very little pressure of the strings against the felt.  I am anticipating that friction should not be a problem in that area as the years wear on, unless my successor decides the drive the coils down to the level of the plate some years down the road.


    ------------------------------
    Floyd Gadd
    Regina SK
    306-502-9103
    ------------------------------