Pianotech

Expand all | Collapse all

Rebuilder Decal Options

  • 1.  Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-24-2018 16:12
    Attached is a picture of my fallboard decal that I was reserving for my remanufactured pianos , but will most likely have to start using more often on the Steinway and Sons rebuilds as well.  Plus, i have attached a couple of other cool options i have found online.

    Perhaps others have some ideas as well?




    PWvGEbjeSgGK4q8e6YeN_cunningham brass plate.jpg

    ------------------------------
    Just Looking through the Go-Bars
    chernobieffpiano.com
    grandpianoman@protonmail.com
    Knoxville, TN
    865-986-7720
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-24-2018 17:20
    Who makes your decal, Chris?

    Interesting regarding S&S shooting themselves in the foot...By denying us the right to use their decal, they are in effect killing the "Steinway retains its value" BS, which actually is fine by me. Pianos bearing the decal will only be new pianos, available only to the 1%, or un-restored stock, which are mostly beat cores, or un-regulated, hard to tune rust buckets.

    "Got a Steinway piano that needs rebuilding lady...too bad...unless you want to belly up the the Steinway bar, pay 3 times what it needs to cost by sending to Steinway, ship it hundreds of miles, and then get a poor vintage rebuild to boot"...sounds like a great deal. They have no idea how important high end rebuilders, who use whatever parts they think will work best in private consultation and contract with their customers, are to the retained value of Steinway's brand...no idea whatsoever. 

    Stupid though is the trend among the powerful these days.


    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-24-2018 18:27
    So if someone wants their piano restored; they can not get the reproduction vintage decals. Am I to assume that it will be processed through their assembly line and will be a factory reconditioned product with no concern to historical decals? That is not going to bode well.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    mailto:jonpage@pianocapecod.com
    http://www.pianocapecod.com
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-24-2018 18:34
    It might take a while but now the producers of the tweaked pianos will have a following and some will command a premium. Much the same as tweaked stock automobiles. And all this time, rebuilders have been letting some other company take all the credit.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    mailto:jonpage@pianocapecod.com
    http://www.pianocapecod.com
    ------------------------------


  • 5.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-24-2018 19:15
    <And all this time, rebuilders have been letting some other company take all the credit.

    I agree.  I have been thinking hard about the personal branding issue over the last year, before they sent their nasty letter.  I had a discussion about this with a long term A owner. Rebuilt by another builder in the 80's. I brought this aging piano's tone, back  over a number of years, to where its performing excellently. I mentioned the little missive our Queens friends dropped on us, and told her, when it was time to rebuild, or if there were damage to the instrument, she could not have the name on the fallboard, or she would have to have Steinway, whose Queens offerings she played and rejected when buying this piano, do the work.

    Here's the neurosis they've engendered...and I think this is a very common marketing brain fart...Based on my client's and my history, I am the one she wants to do any rebuild work for her, but, she needs the name on the fallboard. An impossible situation. Branding...tribal...irrational...but S&S has mastered the con to a high degree. Not sure what that means to us, but that is as it is.

    The good news is that my non-steinway rebuilds, which are by far my preferred stock to work on, become easier to sell. As well, the branding BS, and worse, the unrealistic hyped expectations that always come with a steinway, are just way lower and more manageable when working on a defunct brand. Its a relief not to have to counter the high pressure aggressive BS, mills like our Queens friends pedal.

    I still think though, that the letter is simply bullying, and unenforceable in court...but then who wants to play footsie with a deep pocketed bully?










    ------------------------------
    Jim Ialeggio
    grandpianosolutions.com
    Shirley, MA
    978 425-9026
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-24-2018 19:59
    Jim,
    I believe I had Pierce (of Pierce Piano Atlas) make them. I chose him  over decals unlimited because he could make the ones that look like brass inserts. 

    I've been following several discussions and people are really ticked off at S&S all over the world. This has got to back fire a bit. We'll see.
    -chris

    ------------------------------
    Just Looking through the Go-Bars
    chernobieffpiano.com
    grandpianoman@protonmail.com
    Knoxville, TN
    865-986-7720
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-25-2018 11:17
    I have not tried it yet but have looked into using a stencil to paint it on. There are some very good examples of high quality stenciling online.

    There is no prohibition on painting. 

    Pwg


    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-25-2018 11:26
    Just as long as it's a different font, probably.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    mailto:jonpage@pianocapecod.com
    http://www.pianocapecod.com
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-25-2018 13:32
    Yes Jon,

    Apply a different font (just to be on the "safe" side).  Steinway does own the font from what I have been told.

    Alan,

    Please share this!

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-25-2018 14:25
    Again, the letter specifically states an "facsimile" will not be allowed. No matter how you apply the letters, or what font you use, if the word spells STEINWAY, it's not allowed.

    ------------------------------
    Willem "Wim" Blees, RPT
    Mililani, HI 96789
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-25-2018 14:55
    Wim -
    Keep in mind that the extensive discussion regarding the letter (Decals Unlimited / Steinway) took place, appropriately or not, on PTG-L.  This thread is focused on options, of which there appear to be many.  Since the S&S effort has generally been seen to be ultimately doomed, I don't think it's worth risking side-tracking here.  What might be of more interest, given the ideas and efforts outlined here, is what the effect of their backing-off would be.  
    Also, we've been through what feels like the full range of non-lawyer interpretations.  Time to hear from the other kind.

    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-25-2018 17:45
    Wim,

    No mention of "facsimile" in the letter.

    Anyway, since paint is not a "part", and would literally become a component of the finish, which would be "incidental to the functioning of the piano",  no case (forgive the pun) can be made on this account. 

    Otherwise refinishing the piano would be prohibited. No chance. Frivolous.

    So, what if the rebuilder was somehow able to retain the original insignia in the process? Would that now be prohibited?  Not a chance.

    It's just a scare tactic. Don't fall for it.

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-26-2018 21:28
    Researching water transfers, came across this pretty cool video.
    Water Transfer Printing Hydrographics Applying Printed Designs To Three-Dimensional Objects
    YouTube remove preview
    Water Transfer Printing Hydrographics Applying Printed Designs To Three-Dimensional Objects
    Water Transfer Printing Hydrographics Applying Printed Designs To Three-Dimensional Objects.
    View this on YouTube >


    ------------------------------
    Just Looking through the Go-Bars
    chernobieffpiano.com
    grandpianoman@protonmail.com
    Knoxville, TN
    865-986-7720
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-26-2018 21:36
    Seriously cool!

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-26-2018 22:07
    Here's a video of a guitar maker with a cool way to transfer inkjet art and text.
    How To Transfer An Inkjet Print Onto Wood
    YouTube remove preview
    How To Transfer An Inkjet Print Onto Wood
    This is a technique for transferring an image printed on an inkjet printer to wood. The results are faster and sharper than other methods I have seen.
    View this on YouTube >


    ------------------------------
    Just Looking through the Go-Bars
    chernobieffpiano.com
    grandpianoman@protonmail.com
    Knoxville, TN
    865-986-7720
    ------------------------------



  • 16.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-27-2018 08:16
    Another decal option is water-slide transfers using a dye sublimation printer. Model makers use this process, and it will print in metallic gold and silver, also. Search YouTube for videos. Here is one: https://youtu.be/yC47bmrRofI

    ------------------------------
    Philip Jamison
    Philip Jamison Pianos
    WEST CHESTER PA
    610-696-8449
    ------------------------------



  • 17.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-27-2018 19:25
    This is great. The only problem I can see here is that my printer won't print gold. 

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 18.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-27-2018 19:52
    My printer won't work in water... :-)

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    mailto:jonpage@pianocapecod.com
    http://www.pianocapecod.com
    ------------------------------



  • 19.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-28-2018 13:20
    I got this reply in regard to the guitar decal video Chris C posted from my sister who does a lot with and also teaches various crafts:

    Yes, this is known as an acrylic skin. You encapsulate the ink between layers of gel medium. Any slick transfer paper works. No need to ruin a sticker sheet. Plastic coating on freezer paper or other coated papers work. I have transferred old photos. I also have some special transfer paper that is easier. DAHLIA Waterslide Decal Transfer Paper, 20 Sheets, DIY A4 Inkjet Transparent Clear for Inkjet Printer+BONUS Brush https://www.amazon.com/dp/B077Y5Y1LL/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_LvsjCbMEDFH00
     
    I'm sure someone here will come up with a great solution.

    ------------------------------
    Richard Adkins
    Piano Technician
    Coe College
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    ------------------------------



  • 20.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-28-2018 20:04
    So far the best REALISTIC suggestion I have received came from Bob Friedman (who has been a target of Steinway's legal dept). He suggested making a stencil and painting it on, since this is not a decal, and you are simply restoring what was there and you doing it by hand (they can't stop anyone from doing that). 

    Oramask 813 is a material designed specifically for this purpose. You cut the stencil on a Cricut cutting machine (craft people use this all over the place), remove the backing paper, stick it in place, and use whatever method you want to to restore the gold to its original look. Then just pull the masking off and you're done. 

    Obviously we're only talking about the fallboard here and not the big soundboard stuff. No solution for that yet. 

    Check it out.

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 21.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 12-28-2018 20:30
    That's cool Peter. But just for the sake of argument, isn't a decal (like from decal unlimited) also just paint? 





  • 22.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-28-2018 23:50
    No, a decal is:

    "a picture, design, or label made to be transferred (as to glass) from specially prepared paper". (Merriam-Webster)

    A true artist could recreate the entire label as it was originally (and some Steinways were in fact hand painted originally). If I had that talent I would do it, however since I don't, I need a little "assistance" from a piece of vinyl so as to keep my brush strokes neat and tidy. 

    Interior decorators (as my wife is) use stencils widely to create the hand-painted look all around a room. (Actually it IS hand-painted...just with a little assistance).

    So we just had this discussion tonight:

    Disney aggressively sues EVERYONE who uses any of their trademarks.  I said: "If I BUY a thing at Disney world that has a Disney trademark/logo (let's say Mickey ears for example), and something happens with that object that damages or obliterates that trademark (and perhaps other damage too), and I take it to someone to RESTORE that trademark that was there, am I engaged in the business of selling "trademarked" products for profit? NO! I bought the thing, I own the thing, I want the thing to look the way it was when I bought it because I love everything Disney and I want to put it on my shelf and look at it every day..."

    OTOH if I put Mickey ears on my place of business, and sell toys and other things that look like Mickey mouse, and have Mickey ears all over the place in my establishment, THEN I am going to get a cease and desist letter in the mail from Disney's lawyers, and if I don't stop this practice I will end up in court for trademark violation, because Disney OWNS Mickey ears and they have been protecting that trademark consistently and aggressively for a very long time. 

    Case 1 above you are working for the owner of the instrument, restoring it to THEIR satisfaction (not someone else's standard).  No trademark violation here. The owner of the object is hiring you for a service.

    Case 2 you are seeking to profit from the sale of a trademarked product as part of your business. You have to follow the rules involved with US trademark law. You could possibly be sued successfully if the trademark holder has a consistent record of enforcing their trademark(s).  However, if they did little or nothing for 20 years and all of a sudden decide they want to jump up and down and make a lot of noise because business is slow for them...well the first thing the judge is going to look at is their record of enforcement. If consistent (meaning ALL THE TIME), they have a case, but if not, the defense is going to make a BIG issue out of it and move for dismissal. Then it will become a legal precedent. 

    There are other things like trademark "tarnishment", but historically very difficult to prove and make a case out of.

    Pwg

    Sorry for the long-windedness.


    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 23.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Member
    Posted 01-01-2019 11:36
    Perhaps some form of polite request from PTG legal beagles is called for to clear up the confusion so we all know what the best options are going forward with decals especially on rebuilds and restorations. I understand the need to protect a brand/name/trademark but there are many thousands of pianos that have been restored, rebuilt, refinished and given new decals whether they are S&S, Baldwin, Chickering etc.  Further many of the original parts have been removed and replaced with newer parts so does that not mean the piano is no longer "original" and the decals need to be removed ? Perhaps the solution is for the decals to be for sale only to those in the trade and not engaged in fraud. I ran across a piano that the owner thought was a valuable S&S. Well the best thing on the piano was the elaborate S & S decal on the fallboard. The embossed lettering on the plate reading Haines Brothers was a dead giveaway

    ------------------------------
    James Kelly
    Pawleys Island SC
    843-325-4357
    ------------------------------



  • 24.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-01-2019 21:46
    Courtesy of the Online Piano Atlas there is this part of the story that nobody has brought up yet. This goes WAY beyond just the third party use of decals. Steinway plans on going after anyone that is rebuilding Steinway's, decal or not, that is not using genuine Steinway parts and who is not authorized by Steinway to do the work in the first place. Even stores selling second hand Steinway's may be in for trouble. 

    https://steinwaygrand.com/blogs/steinway-piano-blog/steinway-sons-threatens-legal-action-against-owners-of-its-pianos 

    It's, (almost), enough to give us all second thought about working on Steinway's, in any capacity, without buying into the expensive Steinway training and subsequent authorization to do so. According to the above letter, f you are not officially sanctioned by Steinway it appears that they aggressively do not like you.

    ------------------------------
    Geoff Sykes, RPT
    Los Angeles CA
    ------------------------------



  • 25.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-02-2019 04:19
    Thanks Geoff, for the link.

    It does seem like a strange and rather desperate sales tactic.

    One thing that comes to mind from this discussion is that, like almost all American musical instrument manufacturers, Steinway is owned by a holding company. This is an unfortunate situation because the only thing that holding companies are interested in making is money; so wrapping themselves up in the company's illustrious history and trying to protect the consumer rings false. And I doubt that they are aware that the market for Japanese made  Steinway action parts originated in the 80's because of the sagging quality of their own (overpriced) parts.

    ------------------------------
    Steven Rosenthal
    Honolulu HI

    ------------------------------



  • 26.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-02-2019 11:02
    It's a joke. Steinway will never be able to enforce such a ludicrous demand that rebuilders to use only Steinway parts and only by Steinway authorized rebuilders. Let them come after me for using Ronsen hammers on the last "M" I reconditioned.
    Roger





  • 27.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-02-2019 11:15
    We won't really know what can & can't be done until After the dust settles from law suits and their appeals. Don't be surprised if eventually this winds it way all the way to the Supreme Court. 

    Sheffey Gregory, RPT
    Gregory's Piano Service
    423.614.5001





  • 28.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-02-2019 06:42
    James K. wrote: "...many of the original parts have been removed and replaced with newer parts so does that not mean the piano is no longer "original" and the decals need to be removed?"

    And that suggests a question. Is a new made-in-NY-factory piano really a Steinway if it was made with Kluge keys, Renner action, Mapes strings and a Kelly plate?


    ------------------------------
    Terry Farrell
    Farrell Piano Service, Inc.
    Brandon, Florida
    terry@farrellpiano.com
    813-684-3505
    ------------------------------



  • 29.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-02-2019 10:43
    What will this do to the value of the vast majority of Steinways owned? Who would want to buy a new or used S&S under these circumstances.
    I have an M and a D which I'll have to sit on to see where this goes.  Neither is 'original' because they needed ...ahem... the unmentionable.

    I predict a market downturn.   What tech would ever recommend a S&S now?
    Will schools considering an inventory enhancement now be looking to other makes? I think they will.

    Is Hamburg on board with this too?

    Where does Renner USA fall into this?

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    mailto:jonpage@pianocapecod.com
    http://www.pianocapecod.com
    ------------------------------



  • 30.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-02-2019 11:10
    This seems like a last gasp marketing ploy that won’t save the company. Will it become another Chinese product!

    Sent from my iPhone




  • 31.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-02-2019 16:39
    Steinway owns both Kluge and Kelly. No New York grands are made with Renner parts. My last Ford ranger had a Mazda transmission. It was still a Ford.

    ------------------------------
    Karl Roeder
    Pompano Beach FL
    ------------------------------



  • 32.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-03-2019 08:35
    Karl R. wrote:  Steinway owns both Kluge and Kelly.

    That is now true, but they were using those parts for many decades prior to acquiring those companies.

    No New York grands are made with Renner parts.

    Oh, my mistake then. I thought that there was a decade or two in the past 50 years when they did use Renner parts.

    My last Ford ranger had a Mazda transmission. It was still a Ford.

    Sounds right to me!


    ------------------------------
    Terry Farrell
    Farrell Piano Service, Inc.
    Brandon, Florida
    terry@farrellpiano.com
    813-684-3505
    ------------------------------



  • 33.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 12:36
    I want to poke a small hole in the piano:car analogy some are quite fond of with a little thought experiment.

    Say you were to take a Steinway B, and retrofit a Yamaha C6 plate to fit inside it, (or cast your own with your own scale design) Is that still a Steinway in the same way a Ford with a transmission made by Mazda is still a Ford? Or how a VW bus with a retrofit Porsche engine is still a VW bus? (Or is it?)

    If you wouldn't call the aforementioned piano a Steinway, what would you call it and at what point does it cease to be a Steinway? what is the essential ingredient to any one piano that gives it its identity? The rim? The plate? The decal? (lol) Or is it something more?






    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 34.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 21:58
    Daniel --

    Using the car analogy as an example, many auto manufactures today make their cars with parts made by other auto manufactures. If, say, Ford had contracted with Mazda to make their transmissions then the Ford would still be a Ford. If, on the other had, someone took a Ford and decided to re engineer it to work with a transmission not designed to be part of that car then perhaps it would no longer technically be a Ford. It would be a re engineered Ford. Don't know what the legal aspects of title would be but I'm sure it's relative to percentage of originally specified parts vs non-original non-specified parts. Steinway sells Boston and Essex pianos that are made by Kawai and Young Chang. No Steinway parts involved. They aren't sold as Kawai or Young Chang pianos, they are sold as Steinway "designed" pianos made by an otherwise non-disclosed manufacturer. Are they Kawai and Young Chang pianos, or are they Steinway pianos?

    ------------------------------
    Geoff Sykes, RPT
    Los Angeles CA
    ------------------------------



  • 35.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 22:21
    Using car analogy again, look at the cars in the NASCAR circuit. They say Ford, Chevy and Dodge on the front, but you can bet your bottom dollar that there are other than Chevy parts inside that machine. 

    Yes, there are rebuilders out there who have no business restoring S&S pianos, and putting Steinway on the fallboard. By the same token, there are rebuilders out there who make a factory Steinway play like a NASCAR racing car. 

    Steinway needs to go after the low end rebuilders. Not the whole rebuilding industry.

    ------------------------------
    Willem "Wim" Blees, RPT
    Mililani, HI 96789
    ------------------------------



  • 36.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-02-2019 11:00
    I drive a Toyota. Conceivably, if Toyota were to emulate Steinway, could I be sued if I decide someday to sell the car and there are 3rd party parts in the vehicle? (If, for example, one of the gas struts in the hatchback fails and I replace it with a $25 knockoff instead of the $165 original part.) What happens if I use my own mechanic instead of the dealer for repairs?

    Sent by Erich Borden




  • 37.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-02-2019 15:18
    I posted this elsewhere...if anyone is interested in brushing up on US trademark law, this is a pretty good overview:

    https://cyber.harvard.edu/metaschool/fisher/domain/tm.htm#7

    If a court determines that Steinway has consistently and aggressively protected it's trademarks (essentially similar to Disney's protocol) then they may have a case. But if they have been lax (in the eyes of the court) then they will have no case on infringement. But there are other nuances about the law (such as trademark dilution or tarnishment) that could possibly have some bearing on the matter. 

    Even with licenses, they still are required to keep on top of possible infringers...they cannot leave it up to whoever they licensed (it's the responsibility of the trademark holder to actively pursue violators). So, even with Decals Unlimited, I never saw any effort to ensure that Steinway decals didn't end up on other pianos. Where's the beef, baby?

    If they don't follow through they lose the exclusivity of the trademark.  Unfortunately it will require a court case to determine this, otherwise it's all just hot air (or whatever other metaphor you prefer for fake news).


    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 38.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-02-2019 16:11
    Steinway was involved in creating the doctrine for "initial interest confusion" in Grotrian v Steinway & Sons.

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 39.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-02-2019 23:40
    I've been following this and similar threads on multiple platforms around the world. I must say I have never seen so many ticked off Piano technicians. And unified too!

    ------------------------------
    Just Looking through the Go-Bars
    chernobieffpiano.com
    grandpianoman@protonmail.com
    Knoxville, TN
    865-986-7720
    ------------------------------



  • 40.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 08:48
    Yes..in response to a "dictator".

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 41.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 09:54
    Responding to Chris, Daniel, Peter -
    Definitely remarkable in the aspect of its cross-platform dissemination, though I'd be a bit more conservative as to  characterizing response as 'unified'.  Aroused, to be sure.  Discussion on various platforms has tended to be somewhat oblivious as to what's being said on others, but that's to be expected.  The extended thread on PTG-L, the 'community' designated as PTG members-only, intended for discussions of PTG-specific matters, covered much territory that would have been more appropriately discussed on one of the more open lists, such as this.  The one conversational topic that was most definitely site-appropriate was regarding the any position or action that should be considered by the ORGANIZATION.  To date, somewhat understandably, there has been no response in this area.

    Daniel - the information about the Grotrian case and 'initial interest confusion' doctrine is interesting, but in the context of Peter's previous post, one could see a significant difference between S&S's immediate response, in that instance, and the lack of such, over the years, to the status quo.  

    It's interesting to consider where this all leads.  As has been made clear in this particular thread, numerous rebuilders have already taken steps that could serve them well, whatever the legal outcome, but, in that regard, even if S&S's were to retract the letter, I doubt the 'genie' can be stuffed back into the bottle.  A bit like the ol' Garden O' Eden conundrum.  Can't recapture innocence.


    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 42.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 12:33
    This situation is not dissimilar to the recent "pharma bro" phenomenon:

    Management comes in, jacks up the price of affordable medications by huge margin, just to see if they can make a killing, at least temporarily. Martin Shkreli didn't--hel'll be locked up for a while.
    The company that makes Narcan raised their price 500%, but had to back down eventually.

    Our local Sears is closing: look at the machinations of hedge fund guy Eddie Lampert. Or, look what Bob Gannon did to Montana Power and Light, or what Bain Capital and friends did to Toys R Us. What Samuel Zell did to the Chicago Tribune.

    Is this Steinway, or simply business as usual in the world of corporate takeovers?

    One question that occurred to me: If indeed Steinway would like to corner the market for rebuilding (hard to believe), do they even have the capacity to do that? I wonder how many Steinways are being rebuilt on an annual basis in the US. how many years would you have to wait to get your piano rebuilt? 

    --
    Scott Cole, Registered Piano Technician and Doctor of Music
    Serving Southern Oregon and Northern California
    (541)601-9033

    PTG Journal Editorial Staff/TTT (Tips, Tools & Techniques)





  • 43.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 13:00
    Scott, I think the outrage at this decision is based on a misunderstanding of the motive behind the decision.

    I don't think Steinway wants to corner the market on rebuilding their own pianos. It seems to me they want to take control of their trademark and protect it from harm. Google "rebuilt Steinway" and see how many rebuilding shops you can find that assert that the old Steinways are better than the new ones, and therefore the rebuilt ones must be better than new at a fraction of the cost.

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 44.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 13:32
    Daniel said -

    Scott, I think the outrage at this decision is based on a misunderstanding of the motive behind the decision.

    I don't think Steinway wants to corner the market on rebuilding their own pianos. It seems to me they want to take control of their trademark and protect it from harm. Google "rebuilt Steinway" and see how many rebuilding shops you can find that assert that the old Steinways are better than the new ones, and therefore the rebuilt ones must be better than new at a fraction of the cost.

    I have to say that  outrage would be completely aside from any actual or perceived motive.  It's the consequences that have stirred such a response.  You suggest that :
    they want to take control of their trademark and protect it from harm

    but, as already mentioned by Peter Grey (this discussion or elsewhere),  a legal issue would look at whether they have actively maintained that control, uninterrupted.  Referencing Ed Sutton - Steinwayness & Golf balls - one could make a plausible case that they themselves have been instrumental in such harm.  But wait, there's more.  You pull up what's becoming an orange, if not red herring: the badly rebuilt examples, or a range of spurious claims.  Are you suggesting that if the wording was changed, or the prices were less competitive, then Steinway would be mollified?   Or, if the quality of some of the rebuilds actually met or exceeded that of Restoration, then Steinway would be pleased that the brand was being so well represented?

    If there is misunderstanding of motive, then it's incumbent upon the actor, not the audience, to clarify.

    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 45.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 13:39
    David,

    this is all my personal opinion, but my read of the letter in particular says that decals will not be available and “Furthermore, it is a violation of our trademark rights for someone to market or sell a restored/rebuilt piano as a “Steinway” piano unless: ...”

    it seems to be trademark related, and the ability to advertise as selling "Steinway pianos"

    I never said anything about the quality of the rebuild. Good or bad quality is irrelevant. It's the diversion of attention away from the company by using their own name and advertising that I'm counting as "harm"

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 46.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 14:31
    From a piano technician copy and pasting from the Wikipedia page on Initial Interest Confusion (the best place to get legal advice):

    "On appeal, 2nd Circuit Judge W. H. Timbers confirmed the opinion of Judge L. F. MacMahon that "misled into an initial interest, a potential Steinway buyer may satisfy himself that the less expensive Grotrian-Steinweg is at least as good, if not better, than a Steinway."[4] The Appellate Court however recognized the likelihood of confusion may not exist at the time of purchase because piano purchasers are considered to be careful enough buyers. Instead, the Court held that actual or potential confusion at the time of purchase did not need to be demonstrated in this case. The motivation behind this decision was that "the Grotrian-Steinweg name would attract potential customers based on the reputation built up by Steinway in [the United States] for many years". The Court concluded that Grotrian was attempting to increase their sales based on the strength of the name of "Steinway" and that "such initial confusion works an injury to Steinway".

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 47.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 15:36
    If I am reading this right, it would be similar to if I were to adopt the business name of:

    "Stein-Grey"  or  "Steingrey"

    Not the same...but clearly the intent would be to try to capitalize on the "Steinway" legacy, and create confusion in the mind of the consumer. (Intent to confuse is a hallmark of trademark violation).

    Not sure if I have this right, but I'm sure that if I did that (and was selling nice pianos) they would come after me.

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 48.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 15:53
    Well Peter, this is why there are lawyers

    What we are all collectively doing right now by speculating about this question is akin to what a lawyer might do if they take it upon themselves to try and tune their own brand new Steinway. A piano they are able to afford because they get paid an enormous amount of money to know how to approach these questions and argue them in court. 


    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 49.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 16:46
    Daniel -
    Comes back to your earlier reference to motives.  Why would a lawyer engage in such an effort?  It can't be to save a few bucks... it would have to reflect some aspect of curiosity.  What would the consequences be?  Baring some sort of actual damage (does warranty stipulate that maintenance must be performed by professional?), and assuming that individual had some semblance of musical perception,  he/she would eventually call you.  Consequence nil.  On the other hand, if /when we are inevitably forced to rely on their expertise, the financial consequences will be difficult to ignore.  Why, they'll be able to run out and get a few more pianos for different rooms or homes.  Then will come the dilemma: New, or rebuilt?






    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 50.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 17:04
    Assuming we are still waiting for legal council, I hope that whatever money the PTG is paying our own lawyer is going toward his or her Grotrian fund

    In that case I will be satisfied that Grotrian v Steinway & Sons is not a blind spot when they eventually give us their advice.

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 51.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 18:33
    Just a reminder: we were discussing legal counsel in the abstract.  As it relates to any specific information regarding PTG as an organization and their counsel, that conversation would be appropriately had at PTG-L.   On the other hand,  any insights accrued that would inform our individual situations, as technicians would certainly seem appropriate.  I lose weight just trying to keep track of which discussions is which.

    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 52.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 22:11
    David --

    I recently was called in to try to correct what I consider a manufacturing defect in a Steinway upright. The piano was new and the 1st free tuning tech, (which is a lie in that Steinway actually includes charges for that "1st free tuning" in the purchase), sent out by Steinway basically wouldn't even address it. When I was unable to find a solution that would not cause potential trouble with the warranty I recommended the owner contact the sales person at the Steinway Boutique where she purchased it and ask for help. That salesperson tore into her for even thinking about bringing in a non Steinway trained tech to service her piano. It was made very clear that if she did not hire a trained Steinway tech to take care of the problem, and all her future piano service, there would be problems. I advised her to do what they recommended before seeking a refund or legal action. While I am curious about the outcome I plan on NOT EVER sending this customer any reminders. And only because I feel the need to distance myself from Steinway.

    ------------------------------
    Geoff Sykes, RPT
    Los Angeles CA
    ------------------------------



  • 53.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-03-2019 22:36
    hi Geoff,
    sounds like bullying and perhaps something might have gotten lost in the translation. The only thing that may give problems is that their warranty might be voided if repairs are done by a "non Steinway trained" technician.
    Peter

    ------------------------------
    Petrus Janssen
    Peachtree City GA
    678-416-8055
    ------------------------------



  • 54.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-03-2019 22:40
    I have, for quite some time (early '90's), refused to work on certain pianos until they are out of warranty. I am not a consumer advocate and don't want to be caught between a customer, a dealer and a manufacturer. I can rectify certain situations (that are ignored or denied of its existence) at the owners expense.

    After all; it's not a fault, it's a feature.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,

    Jon Page
    mailto:jonpage@pianocapecod.com
    http://www.pianocapecod.com
    ------------------------------



  • 55.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-03-2019 22:45
    by the way Geoff, i had something similar happen the first year of being in business: a new customer of mine who had just bought a brand new Steinway S, had a problem with long sustain. The Steinway tech who came, just tuned the piano and did not try to resolve the issue. The second Steinway tech who was sent to analyze the problem and make corrections, was not able to do so. When she contacted me, i found it was something so easy to resolve: key bushings had a way too tight a fit on the balance keys. After some easing, everything worked perfectly.
    I always found it strange that a Steinway tech, whom i assume, was trained, could not or perhaps would not fix something simple as that. My customer never contacted Steinway again, still has the piano but was unhappy with the treatment she had received from the Steinway dealer.
    Peter

    ------------------------------
    Petrus Janssen
    Peachtree City GA
    678-416-8055
    ------------------------------



  • 56.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 23:21
    Geoff -
    That is an disquieting anecdote, on just so many levels. A couple of alternate scenarios come to mind -
    - the client was incensed and itching to fight back
    - the client, who, in your telling appears to be a new call, was, in fact, a long time customer, who was being told that you were no longer qualified to work on her piano 

    Does the written warranty state that piano must be serviced only by authorized technician?  If not, what  legal action is the salesperson, and the establishment potentially vulnerable to?  If you can determine that this is, in fact, the official policy of the establishment, and, ipso facto, of Steinway, then you would have documentation of much higher stakes than Daniel has been prone to acknowledge.  (not blaming Daniel).

    Resolving to not send her reminders is not quite the denouement one might want.  Just curious: why wouldn't you check back with her to see if the problem was resolved?

    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 57.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 00:21
    David --

    This was a new client. Dissatisfied with the 1st free tuning she had received. Personality conflict with the assigned tech more than anything, but the problem was nevertheless not dealt with at that time. I met her at a party. 

    She was not itching to fight back. She just had a problem that bothered her and which the previous tech would not address. I tuned the piano, did what troubleshooting I could and informed her that since this was a brand new piano I was uncomfortable taking the repair further without store/Steinway approval. More than anything else, I was uncomfortable digging in to a brand new Steinway upright at more than the new piano prep level, and subsequently possibly being blamed for the problem. I encouraged her to contact her salesperson and get official help. 

    The Steinway salesperson didn't tell her that I was no longer qualified to service her piano. They scolded her for not using a Steinway certified tech in the first place. Literally scolded her. That's not the way to win friends, referrals or repeat customers. 

    I don't know about the written warranty. I refuse to make the call as to whether a repair is warranty or not. I will get involved and add my 2¢ when asked, but I consider that solely between the customer and the salesperson or manufacturer. I will explain the problem, and what I believe the repair to be, to the customer, and recommend they contact their salesperson to see if it can be repaired, perhaps under warranty, but it is up to the customer and the salesperson, or manufacturer, to decide if it is covered by warranty or not. 

    My decision to not send her reminders is solely because I have no desire to get involved with Steinway/customer squabbles. I actually like this person and I feel bad that her dream of owning a Steinway, (specifically upright), is being sabotaged by manufacturing practices, hostile salespeople and disinterested "Steinway authorized" techs. I just feel like the more I get involved the more problems she is going to face simply because I am not Steinway certified. 

    On a secondary note, I recently lost a school district contract because someone had donated two new Steinway grands to the school districts recently rebuilt performance hall. Both the person who donated the pianos and Steinway told the school that they were forbidden from bringing me in to service those pianos purely for the reason that I was not Steinway certified.

    ------------------------------
    Geoff Sykes, RPT
    Los Angeles CA
    ------------------------------



  • 58.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 06:53
    Geoff,

    I'm not saying those things didn't happen to you, but they are certainly dubious based on the fact that Steinway doesn't offer certification for technicians. There is no such thing as a "Steinway Certified Technician" and it seems that someone somewhere along the way got their signals crossed. Whether it was the salesperson in their sales training, the customer on the phone with the salesperson, or you talking to your client, (or me reading your post) someone misunderstood something.

    I am not aware of any policy in place from any manufacturer that dictates that regular service must be done by a manufacturer-approved technician. Your story sounds more like the typical piano store arrangement in which warranty claims on any piano of any make are taken care of by an employee or a contractor hired by the store. The seller has a reasonable expectation to vet the technicians whom they pay to do warranty work. Either to maintain a certain quality standard that the store sees as valuable to its image, or for price reasons to make sure they don't end up overpaying for a repair on a piano with a narrow profit margin. It is typical for a store to maintain control over who does their warranty work in the warranty agreement. Nothing unusual here apart from the scolding which just sounds like a rude salesperson. (Imagine that)

    As for the school, maybe the technician graduated from the training program at the Steinway factory and the district decided to hire them based on a resume that fit their needs better. It happens. If the technician who took your place is advertising themselves as "Steinway Certified", then that's something that the Steinway company would actually have a problem with. They're very clear about not allowing this terminology when you attend their training program. 

    Back to your client with the upright though. Im curious what this warranty issue was. What was the problem and what was your proposed solution?

    (Also, earlier you asked if Boston and Essex pianos were considered Steinway pianos. It sounds like I'm being facetious but I promise I'm not. They are considered "Boston" and "Essex" pianos. Separate brand identity, but referred to as being in the "family of Steinway designed pianos")

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 59.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 09:52
    Since we are swapping war stories about clients who own Steinway products still under warranty but with problems left unresolved by the store's chosen technician...

    Boston grand--potentially nice piano, really--with a few straightforward issues (tight damper guide-rail bushings, tight front-rail key bushings, and poor music desk fit). Store tech had been out repeatedly, yet problems persist. Client finally threw in the towel and hired me to resolve the problems. I cautioned her about "incurring the wrath" of the dealer and manufacturer by not using their tech, and that they may let the boogey man of possible invalidation of warranty out of his cage. She understood all of the caveats, doesn't have the patience to continue to play footsies with the dealer, has the money to pay me, and wants the piano to play as it should (by any reasonable objective standard).

    In this case, the incompetence of the dealer tech and the apparent lack of willingness on the part of the dealer to resolve obvious mechanical issues  speak for themselves. 

    In what universe have I done her a disservice by fixing the problems on her piano? (I can imagine the answer now, "Why, in the Steinway-verse, of course: A land peopled by the guardians of the sacred 'Steinwayness'!")

    Alan

    ------------------------------
    Alan Eder, RPT
    Herb Alpert School of Music
    California Institute of the Arts
    Valencia, CA
    661.904.6483
    ------------------------------



  • 60.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 10:02
    Alan,

    No matter who the store is owned by or what brand of pianos they sell, a warranty issue is typically going to be taken care of by a technician of their choosing. This is not a Steinway specific policy.

    When you do encounter one of your clients with a piano under warranty, the important thing to remember is that for the warranty work, the store is your client. It's important to connect with them if you hope to fix it and get paid while also making sure your customer doesn't have to open their wallet.

    its a tightrope walk, but many of us do it regularly

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 61.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 10:11
    Daniel,

    I did not mean to imply that the scenario described is unique to the Steinway experience. It is simply that Steinway, by virtue of their decal policy, is the brand under discussion on this thread.

    This store is not my client. I have never done any work for them, and they did not call me in on this piano. The piano owner did. She opened her wallet of her own accord and beseeched me to take her money and solve the problems, since she was not getting satisfaction from the dealer.

    This is no tightrope walk for me, but unfortunate for her (not to mention the reputation of the dealer and the manufacturer).

    Alan

    ------------------------------
    Alan Eder, RPT
    Herb Alpert School of Music
    California Institute of the Arts
    Valencia, CA
    661.904.6483
    ------------------------------



  • 62.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 10:21
    Alan,

    you could have saved your customer some money by picking up the phone and calling the dealer yourself. If you conduct yourself professionally, you might be able to convince the store that after three separate visits from their technician, it's time for you to step in. By keeping your customer calm and assuring them you will handle it, the store might even thank you. Your professional feedback will also help alert the store to the incompetence or disinterest of their regular tech. 

    Everyone wins

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 63.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 10:38
    It's also important to understand the store's perspective in this situation. Now here is a hypothetical that is in no way intended to question your ability, but... What would this situation look like if you were less experienced and misdiagnosed a problem that wasn't there, and took it upon yourself to "fix" it.

    whose responsibility would it be to fix the iatrogenic damage in that scenario?

    these scenarios are typically why stores want to use their own techs.

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 64.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 10:57
    Except that the most qualified Steinway techs aren't always the ones working for the stores. I think the reason they want their own techs has more to do with the those who are more willing to broaden the range of what is acceptable from the factory and not create issues. I recall bringing to the attention of the dealer a problem with hardened and noisy backchecks on a new piano and so they sent their own tech to tell the customer that was "normal". It wasn't. The customer ended up having it repaired at their own expense. New piano. Building their brand?  I don't think so.




    On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 7:39 AM -0800, "Daniel DeBiasio via Piano Technicians Guild"





  • 65.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 14:05
    Daniel -
    I fear you are being sucked in, little by little, to a position that you might ultimately find constricting.  Take a moment to step back and re-acknowledge your own multiple hats in this, as some may not recall that you are, in fact, employed by Steinway.  I'm not saying that this, in and of itself determines the 'truthiness' of your comments, but it does demand much more vigilance, on your part.  The line between your personal views and the company 'line' can become blurred.

    I responded to a thought that Ed Sutton expressed on a related discussion on PTG-L (permission has been given), where he wondered  "what it would be like to not have a dog in this fight", which I took to be trying to look at the larger picture... objectivity. (He has since expanded this comment but I think (hope) I capture the gist.  ) I countered (cordially) that having 'no dogs' was not as functional an analogy as thinking of them all as 'our dogs'.  We want to see piano manufacturers succeed; we want to see quality; we want to see our own efforts valued.  It's a bit 'quantum', but we can't seem to be arguing for all of our dogs at the same moment.  Yes, a dealer wants to control the parameters of a warranty if it affects their bottom line or reputation, but that does not give them licence to abuse either the customer or community of technicians. 

    I can't help having had a somewhat unpleasant 'mental reflux' (the unpleasant being obviously redundant, as is, I suppose, refllux) in your responses to Geoff Sykes and Alan Eder.  To Geoff, you said: "I'm not saying those things didn't happen to you, but they are certainly dubious"

    So, guess what refluxed: The questioning of Christine Blasey Ford.  These guys related something of their experience, and you are actively suggesting that they were mistaken.  I suspect that you don't know them, nor the dynamics of the piano-sales community out there, but assert that their narratives are flawed, based upon your own experience with the mother ship.  I don't think that's a strong position.

    But I agree that the issue is complex, and I'll briefly add my own experience which, in fact, was quite positive: A client had been referred to me, having recently purchased a Boston Grand.  He was having problems with the action that had not satisfactorily been addressed by dealership up to that point.  I examined the action and conveyed my assessment to dealer, who found it plausible and authorized me to do the work.  In the process, it became clear that there was a more of a design issue, albeit subtle, that made his ultimate satisfaction unlikely.  I communicated with dealer, who ultimately switched out piano for one that both client and I felt addressed his concerns.  At all times, the people I dealt with were cordial, professional, and clearly wanted customer to be satisfied.  

    But, to somewhat support some of Daniel's argument, this most likely worked out because, while never having actually worked for Steinway, I've had irregular contacts with people over the years.  This is not to say that they were happy with me for my 'activism', but I did work to facilitate a resolution between company and client.  But this was New York... the mother... the one Daniel is most familiar with.  The dynamics where Greg, or Alan are could be quite different. (as attested to by Alan's  post just now.)

    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 66.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 14:58
    David,

    I didn't mean to suggest the dubiousness came from Geoff. I thought I made that clear in pointing out the possible points of miscommunication starting with the salesperson.

    my opinions in this thread are my own, and I resent the comparison to Congress in Dr Ford's testimony before Congress and the manner in which she was questioned

    My intentions are not to discredit my peers with whom I may occasionally disagree, but respect very greatly. My posts only intend to highlight points of miscommunication and misunderstanding as we engage on this awful disconnected platform.  Please go back and read my posts with this in mind. 

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 67.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 15:29
    Daniel -
    In all cases, I was conveying my assessment, as a reader, not your intentions.  If I had a particular take on a comment which was not what you intended, it's possible that either I might have misread, or you might have mis-constructed the comment, or both. 
    I had, and have, no doubt as to the personal conviction of your comments, however, as I indicated, you are somewhat of a 'special case', given your particular status, and, for the sake of clarity, it's better to somewhat overstate it than under.  To be clear, I find it hard to believe that you would be quite as vociferous if your opinions were more aligned with the more skeptical voices.  (See what I mean about getting painted into a corner?) :) 

    There's no room in this discussion for resentment.  I didn't 'compare' you to Congress, although perhaps my body did. Reflux can be that way. Perhaps it just comes down to any compound sentence coordinated by 'but'.   You began with I'm not saying those things didn't happen to you, but they are certainly dubious...
    The basic gist of most of that post seemed (to me) to reinforce that 'but'.   Have a drink and reread it.  Either you'll see my point or I'll be looking over my shoulder next week.  But please, no resentment.




    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 68.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 15:57
    Thanks for that clarification David. Consider the hatchet buried before I could even replace both the head and the handle.

    I can be clumsy with words for sure, so for any perceived insult I truly apologize.

    My opinion is colored by my own trek through this industry from my days as an apprentice with Arizona's number 1 Steinway fanatic, Mark DeCotiis (may he rest in peace), through New York's many different stores, institutions and private contract work before ending up at Steinway again. After my mentor’s passing which marked my loss of a compass, I held the idea and symbol and mythology of Steinway as Mark held it in my own mind as a beacon of light to show the way forward. Through the journey I saw the name mistreated in many different ways by shop owners who have a vested interest in maligning the name "New Steinway" and I've been witness to many different rebuilds. None of which have impressed me as much as the best Steinways I've ever played. 

    My involvement in this may be deeply emotional for me, but I can assure you it has absolutely nothing to do with my current paycheck. (Lol)

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 69.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 16:13
    for any perceived insult I truly apologize.

    I didn't notice any but I'll go back and see if I missed it.  Otherwise, I'll save the apology for the next time it's actually warranted (as opposed to warrantied). 
    Meanwhile, my highest priority remains that you keep getting that paycheck.

    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 70.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 13:54

    Daniel,

    Maybe I did not make it clear enough that by the time the client called me in, she wanted to have nothing further to do with the dealer. I suggested the course of action that you prescribed and she adamantly declined. (By the way, in your erroneous assumption that I did not propose that I contact the dealer on her behalf, you seem to imply that I am insufficiently professional. Such innuendo does not rise to meet the otherwise high standard of discourse you usually maintain.) For me to have failed to propose that I contact the dealer would have been conduct unbecoming of the RPT credential… or of any self-respecting technician worth their salt.

    If this is the kind of work that their store tech normally does, and the dealer does not realize that they are incompetent and/or disinterested in problem resolution, then I would not know where to start that conversation.

    Can an "Everyone wins" scenario be pulled out of this fire? No, it is not, not once the customer becomes fed up with the treatment they have received from the dealer, can afford to throw own money at the problem and have decided that the best course of action for them personally is to do just that, eyes wide open.

    Alan



    ------------------------------
    Alan Eder, RPT
    Herb Alpert School of Music
    California Institute of the Arts
    Valencia, CA
    661.904.6483
    ------------------------------



  • 71.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 14:54
    Alan,

    Please forgive the perceived insult as it was definitely not my intention to imply in any way that you acted unprofessionally. I simply thought it was worth mentioning that no matter how frustrating a particular dealers behavior can be to us as technicians, it helps to be professional. I know you knew that but I wanted to reiterate it. The misunderstanding is likely coming from my own quick read of your post where I didn't pick up on the fact that your client was more interested that you not go to bat for her with the dealer and would rather just pay you to fix it.

    My recommendations were clearly based on my own misunderstanding and those recommendations appear to be a given based on the insult you perceived at my recommending them. My apologies again. 

    I want to clarify again that the unsolicited advice I gave you is universal for all piano stores and I recommend it again for the benefit of anyone receiving emails from this thread that they can't make stop. 








    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 72.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 17:15
    Daniel,

    Please know that I do appreciate your clarification and apology. All too often nowadays, too many people merely skim posts, and then respond based on an incomplete understanding of what was actually said. It is an indication of your good character that you owed up to having done that.

    Peace out,

    Alan

    ------------------------------
    Alan Eder, RPT
    Herb Alpert School of Music
    California Institute of the Arts
    Valencia, CA
    661.904.6483
    ------------------------------



  • 73.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 10:03
    Geoff

    The dealer or manufacturer cannot require you to use their technicians. It violates fair trade practices. Nor does using another tech void any warranty on the instrument. In fact, using after market parts also does not void the warranty unless it can be proven that the use of that part created the problem (search "what voids a warranty"). 

    I have a situation. A customer is refinishing their piano because of some case damage. No rebuilding has taken place, all original 1980s Steinway. The customer contacted both Steinway and the dealer for a decal and was refused by both.

    I think it's clear that this is not a protecting their trademark issue but a panic reaction to pressure by controlling partners who are losing money. I don't think this will end well for them because it is an affront to their customers as well as an industry that has been largely supportive of their product. The question of aftermarket parts is complicated by the fact that they have changed their parts so often over the years (even Renner parts were used in some NY Steinways at one point) that what is "authentic" for a piano from 1920 can be debated. For example I would argue that the low profile Ronsen Weickert or Wurzen hammer much more closely resembles the 1920 hammer than the current iteration from Steinway which is why I prefer to use it. Interestingly, I have a customer searching for a Steinway to purchase and has rejected buying a new one because, compared to the more "vintage" instruments he has played, the new ones sound dull and lifeless, he reports. 

    Ironically, it's the rebuilders doing real quality work that are perpetuating the lasting quality of the Steinway piano more than Steinway with their current production practices. 

    So it seems to me that authenticity or trademark is not the issue at all. As in most things, to find the source of the problem, follow the money. 




    ------------------------------
    David Love RPT
    www.davidlovepianos.com
    davidlovepianos@comcast.net
    415 407 8320
    ------------------------------



  • 74.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 12-25-2018 11:26
    An associate made custom stencils for our benches (just in case they forget where they belong and decide to use their legs to walk away!). She has a device that did a great job burning her name into the wooden handle of her tuning lever, and neatly cut mylar for the bench stencils. There was a bit of a learning curve before me owned the process of how best to apply the paint, but in the end the results were top flight!

    Alan

    ------------------------------
    Alan Eder, RPT
    Herb Alpert School of Music
    California Institute of the Arts
    Valencia, CA
    661.904.6483
    ------------------------------



  • 75.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 23:11
    Some years ago, at a PTG conventnion, when Steinway still had a concert and a party afterward, I was at the reception.  Standing together, were two Steinway executives, I forget which two they were.  So, I walked up to them and said, " I just did a rebuild for a customer on an M.  It has a soundboard, block, and bridges by a rebuilder in MI, Renner action parts, Mapes Int. Gold wire, Arledge custom bass strings, etc.  Is it still a Steinway?"   they both laughed, and one of them said, "Well, maybe less of one!"  And laughed some more.  It is a wonderful piano.
         I guess that things have changed?  If the customer loves the end result, and I DID discuss the all-Steinway parts thing with her (She said that she wanted it to sing, and she didn't care whose parts I used) , in the end, is it really hurting the Steinwayness factor?


    ------------------------------
    Clark A. Sprague, RPT
    Bowling Green, OH
    www.clarkspianoservice.com
    ------------------------------



  • 76.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-03-2019 23:33
    I don't know what I did, but since I made a comment here yesterday, I've been getting comments sent to me via email. Anyone know how to turn that off? My settings say "no email". What am I missing?

    ------------------------------
    Steven Rosenthal
    Honolulu HI

    ------------------------------



  • 77.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 00:23
    Steven --

    You're not missing anything. The forum is set up to allow us to reply to the forum publicly or directly to you privately.

    ------------------------------
    Geoff Sykes, RPT
    Los Angeles CA
    ------------------------------



  • 78.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-04-2019 01:07
    Except, I've suddenly been getting
    emails from everyone seperately and
    my settings at set at no email. This
    is the first time this every happened.

    I'm supposed to just get a daily digest.

    But I do enjoy reading each and every 
    posting.

    I went to check my settings and they are
    still the same. I think there's glitch
    but not sure how to fix that.



    --
     Richard Adkins 
     Keyboard Tuning and Maintenance
     Curator of Instruments 
    Coe College Cedar Rapids, IA         
    Notice:
    This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not named you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system.

    Warning: Although the sender has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the sender cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.






  • 79.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 09:49
    Same issue here except it was on the PTG-L forum. After repeated efforts to reset my settings, I directed gmail to consider it as spam. Now they just go to my spam folder. 

    This has happened to others before too. 

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 80.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 09:54
    Peter -
    Just curious.  Did you ever contact Clint Sears at the Home Office to ask him to have a look?

    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 81.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 11:47
    David,

    No I did not. I simply took executive action myself as it was driving me nuts.

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 82.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 13:01
    I just noticed at the bottom of the emails there are unsubscribe options including "unsubscribe to this thread."
    Live and learn.

    Btw, if they want to build their brand and project confidence in their products, perhaps they could do better than offering the shortest warranty period in the industry.

    ------------------------------
    Steven Rosenthal
    Honolulu HI
    808-521-7129
    ------------------------------



  • 83.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 17:31
    All-
    Perhaps glaringly obvious ( that would be me ), but a piano's warranty is with the manufacturer, not the retailer. They may be their agent, but only the maker warrants their goods, not their dealers. This is often misinterpreted by clients and technicians alike.

    ------------------------------
    David Brown
    Garland TX
    ------------------------------



  • 84.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-04-2019 18:08
    David (Love),

    In addition to your fine assessment of the situation, I would bring in the fact that once a manufacturer's warranty has expired (ANY manufactured product anywhere) they have absolutely NO MORE SAY whatsoever in what happens to it. The owner is free to do what they want with it and the manufacturer has no recourse of any kind. In fact, usually they will disavow any further connection with it BECAUSE of the expired warranty. 

    If anyone doubts this, just try contacting the manufacturer about a problem after expiration. See what they say. 

    They only care when they are on the hook for a possible expenditure. After that, they couldn't care less what you do.

    Therefore, any Steinway owner, whether they are a consumer, tech, dealer, or whatever, is free to do as they want (short of fraud obviously). The manufacturer cannot come back 100 years later and demand or require anything to do with that piano. Its totally absurd. 

    Pwg



    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 85.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-04-2019 20:31
    I'm curious if Steinway's restoration shop will just restore fallboards? 

    Chernobieff Piano Restorations

    Chris Chernobieff ( pronounced chur-no-bif )
    Lenoir City, Tennessee 
    email: chrisppff@gmail.com
    Follow on:  Facebook
    phone: 865-986-7720











  • 86.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-05-2019 12:21
    I've been thinking about this again (always a bit precarious) and I realized...Steinway does not "restore" any pianos. They "remanufacture" them to current 2018 specs and dimensions. They literally throw away everything except the case and plate, and start all over again with CURRENT stuff. There is NO effort to keep any of the original historicity of the instrument, therefore THEY are deceiving the public by their use of the term "restoration". 

    Many of us OTOH actually try to restore as much of the original design as possible. Even with a new soundboard, many (though not all) literally duplicate the original design of that instrument, which falls more in line with "restoration" than "remanufacturing". 

    So, who's deceiving who?

    I wonder what a judge would say?

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 87.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-05-2019 14:25

    So, who's deceiving who?
    I wonder what a judge would say?

    Peter -
    The first thing a credible judge should say is " 'Whom', not 'Who' ".
    Apart from that, you make a good point, with the added perspective that, according to information recently presented to our chapter, there has been a fundamental if not subtle shift in the scaling and tonal objectives of the larger instruments, as the company blends the NY and Hamburg methods.  Others might be able to speak more authoritatively about this, but it goes to Peter's point, even in the 'restoration' of more recent instruments.





    ------------------------------
    David Skolnik [RPT]
    Hastings-on-Hudson NY
    914-231-7565
    ------------------------------



  • 88.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-06-2019 08:01
    Another fun video: 

    EASY Photo Transfer to Wood - Fast, Clean, REUSABLE, Cheap Print on Wood Using Mailing Labels

    https://youtu.be/h7FKdW5ndLw

    ------------------------------
    Rick Butler
    Bowie MD
    240 396 7480
    RickRickRickRickRick
    ------------------------------



  • 89.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-06-2019 08:42
    How are the traditional "Varnish transfer" decals made? They have a better metallic appearance, and they don't go bad like water and rub-on transfers. I've used 50+ year-old varnish transfers successfully. I was sorry when Pierce stopped carrying the Steinway line.


    ------------------------------
    Philip Jamison
    Philip Jamison Pianos
    WEST CHESTER PA
    610-696-8449
    ------------------------------



  • 90.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-06-2019 13:16
    Philip, 

    If I am not mistaken, the Steinway "license" was taken away from him and given to Decals Unlimited approximately 20 years ago. I do not know the reason(s) behind it though. 

    If someone knows more accurately about this (and especially if I am wrong) please inform.

    Many years ago I remember seeing a demo at a seminar (by some factory guy) of applying the varnish transfer by completly coating the back with varnish, letting get tacky, applying, and then cleaning up the excess varnish with a padding technique. However I was never able to duplicate this. It was fast, efficient, and free of defect. Vs. tracing varnish on just the letters/graphics and applying that way. Slow and tedious.

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 91.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-06-2019 15:18
    Peter G. wrote: "...Steinway does not "restore" any pianos. They "remanufacture" them to current 2018 specs and dimensions. They literally throw away everything except the case and plate, and start all over again with CURRENT stuff. There is NO effort to keep any of the original historicity of the instrument, therefore THEY are deceiving the public by their use of the term "restoration". 

    Many of us OTOH actually try to restore as much of the original design as possible. Even with a new soundboard, many (though not all) literally duplicate the original design of that instrument, which falls more in line with "restoration" than "remanufacturing"."

    I'm not sure I follow regarding a Steinway soundboard. How does a 2018 spec S&S soundboard installed during a remanufacture in the S&S factory differ from the original (well, except perhaps, the tapering of the panel)?


    Terry Farrell

    ------------------------------
    Terry Farrell
    Farrell Piano Service, Inc.
    Brandon, Florida
    terry@farrellpiano.com
    813-684-3505
    ------------------------------



  • 92.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-06-2019 22:24
    Terry,

    I'm speaking more in a legal sense than anything else.

    "The Letter" mentioned misinformation propagated (in essence) by rebuilders who use non-Steinway parts, etc. However, I am highlighting the fact that Steinway itself is propagating misinformation by touting its "Restoration Department" as THE one and only place to truly restore a Steinway piano. How is this? 

    As I stated, they remanufacture the pianos according to 2018/2019 thinking and specs, regardless of what specs (and the reasoning for them) went into that 1917 (or whatever) instrument. If a client says: "I want my mother's piano to play and sound as much as possible as it did in 1917" (for instance), Steinway is NOT going to do this.  They have a protocol that they apply to each piano and you take it or leave it. Whereas if the client says the same to many of us (including you) who like to listen to them, we have many alternate "tools, tweaks, and materials" available to us to achieve what the client is asking...hammers, wire, geometry, and other true restoration techniques that we have learned and perfected so as to reproduce that 1917 sound and feel more authentically BECAUSE we are not locked into a "take it or leave it" mentality. 

    There is value in being able to do this and do it well. It's not always about the "latest and the greatest", but rather the ability to recreate what WAS, if that is what the client wants. This is what we specialize in, and Steinway does not. They want to force everyone into a predetermined mold (today's mold). That is NOT restoration (at least in my book).  Anyone is free to disagree with this point of view, but I have seen the emotional reaction of family members too many times to set this aside in favor of what is basically a "new" piano (which is what Steinway does) for which they could just go buy a new one and get the same thing (but that's not what they want).

    Does this make any sense? Or am I just gibber jabbering? At this point I'm not sure. 

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 93.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-06-2019 23:55
    What you say makes sense to me, Peter. The one time I spoke with their restoration department I found them to be abrupt and purely transactional, if the person I was speaking with was a technician, I couldn't tell. As you say, they turn them into modern Steinways.
    I was calling about two 1936 O's that had historical significance and the soundboards were excellent. I thought they might be preserved. The person I spoke to was of the opinion, actually stated it as a fact, that soundboards only last about fifty years and even if these one's were good they would surely fail in the near future. When I realized that the only part of the pianos that would remain would be the cabinets I lost interest in that avenue. This was in the mid 90's and I think their charge at the time was $30k plus shipping.

    ------------------------------
    Steven Rosenthal
    Honolulu HI


  • 94.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-07-2019 00:22
    Hi, Peter,

    Spot on.

    Kind regards.

    Horace

    On 1/6/2019 7:24 PM, Peter Grey via Piano Technicians Guild wrote:
    > Please do not forward this message due to Auto Login.
    >
    > Terry,
    >
    > I'm speaking more in a legal sense than anything else.
    >
    > "The Letter" mentioned misinformation propagated (in essence) by rebuilders who use non-Steinway parts, etc. However, I am highlighting the fact that Steinway itself is propagating misinformation by touting its "Restoration Department" as THE one and only place to truly restore a Steinway piano. How is this?
    >
    > As I stated, they remanufacture the pianos according to 2018/2019 thinking and specs, regardless of what specs (and the reasoning for them) went into that 1917 (or whatever) instrument. If a client says: "I want my mother's piano to pay and sound as much as possible as it did in 1917" (for instance), Steinway is NOT going to do this.?? They have a protocol that they apply to each piano and you take it or leave it. Whereas if the client says the same to many of us (including you) who like to listen to them, we have many alternate "tools, tweaks, and materials" available to us to achieve what the client is asking...hammers, wire, geometry, and other true restoration techniques that we have learned and perfected so as to reproduce that 1917 sound and feel more authentically BECAUSE we are not locked into a "take it or leave it" mentality.
    >
    > There is value in being able to do this and do it well. It's not always about the "latest and the greatest", but rather the ability to recreate what WAS, if that is what the client wants. This is what we specialize in, and Steinway does not. They want to force everyone into a predetermined mold (today's mold). That is NOT restoration (at least in my book).?? Anyone is free to disagree with this point of view, but I have seen the emotional reaction of family members too many times to set this aside in favor of what is basically a "new" piano (which is what Steinway does) for which they could just go buy a new one and get the same thing (but that's not what they want).
    >
    > Does this make any sense? Or am I just gibber jabbering? At this point I'm not sure.
    >
    > Pwg
    >
    > ------------------------------
    > Peter Grey
    > Stratham NH
    > 603-686-2395
    > pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    > ------------------------------
    > -------------------------------------------
    > Original Message:
    > Sent: 01-06-2019 15:18
    > From: Terrence Farrell
    > Subject: Rebuilder Decal Options
    >
    > Peter G. wrote: "...Steinway does not "restore" any pianos. They "remanufacture" them to current 2018 specs and dimensions. They literally throw away everything except the case and plate, and start all over again with CURRENT stuff. There is NO effort to keep any of the original historicity of the instrument, therefore THEY are deceiving the public by their use of the term "restoration".
    >
    > Many of us OTOH actually try to restore as much of the original design as possible. Even with a new soundboard, many (though not all) literally duplicate the original design of that instrument, which falls more in line with "restoration" than "remanufacturing"."
    >
    > I'm not sure I follow regarding a Steinway soundboard. How does a 2018 spec S&S soundboard installed during a remanufacture in the S&S factory differ from the original (well, except perhaps, the tapering of the panel)?
    >
    >
    > Terry Farrell
    >
    > ------------------------------
    > Terry Farrell
    > Farrell Piano Service, Inc.
    > Brandon, Florida
    > terry@farrellpiano.com <terry@farrellpiano.com>
    > 813-684-3505
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Original Message:
    > Sent: 01-05-2019 12:20
    > From: Peter Grey
    > Subject: Rebuilder Decal Options
    >
    > I've been thinking about this again (always a bit precarious) and I realized...Steinway does not "restore" any pianos. They "remanufacture" them to current 2018 specs and dimensions. They literally throw away everything except the case and plate, and start all over again with CURRENT stuff. There is NO effort to keep any of the original historicity of the instrument, therefore THEY are deceiving the public by their use of the term "restoration".
    >
    > Many of us OTOH actually try to restore as much of the original design as possible. Even with a new soundboard, many (though not all) literally duplicate the original design of that instrument, which falls more in line with "restoration" than "remanufacturing".
    >
    > So, who's deceiving who?
    >
    > I wonder what a judge would say?
    >
    > Pwg
    >
    > ------------------------------
    > Peter Grey
    > Stratham NH
    > 603-686-2395
    > pianodoctor57@gmail.com <pianodoctor57@gmail.com>
    >
    > Original Message:
    > Sent: 01-04-2019 20:30
    > From: Chris Chernobieff
    > Subject: Rebuilder Decal Options
    >
    > I'm curious if Steinway's restoration shop will just restore fallboards? Chernobieff Piano Restorations
    > Chris Chernobieff ( pronounced chur-no-bif )Lenoir City, Tennessee
    > email: chrisppff@gmail.com <chrisppff@gmail.com>web: chernobieffpiano.com <http://chernobieffpiano.com>
    > Follow on: Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/ChernobieffPianoandHarpsichordMFG/>
    > phone: 865-986-7720
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Original Message------
    >
    > David (Love),
    >
    > In addition to your fine assessment of the situation, I would bring in the fact that once a manufacturer's warranty has expired (ANY manufactured product anywhere) they have absolutely NO MORE SAY whatsoever in what happens to it. The owner is free to do what they want with it and the manufacturer has no recourse of any kind. In fact, usually they will disavow any further connection with it BECAUSE of the expired warranty.
    >
    > If anyone doubts this, just try contacting the manufacturer about a problem after expiration. See what they say.
    >
    > They only care when they are on the hook for a possible expenditure. After that, they couldn't care less what you do.
    >
    > Therefore, any Steinway owner, whether they are a consumer, tech, dealer, or whatever, is free to do as they want (short of fraud obviously). The manufacturer cannot come back 100 years later and demand or require anything to do with that piano. Its totally absurd.
    >
    > Pwg
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    > Peter Grey
    > Stratham NH
    > 603-686-2395
    > pianodoctor57@gmail.com <pianodoctor57@gmail.com>
    > ------------------------------
    >
    >
    > Reply to Sender : http://my.ptg.org/eGroups/PostReply/?GroupId=43&SenderKey=9e630203-91a1-491d-8c04-f5c286672e79&MID=697544&MDATE=756%253e45645%253b&UserKey=3feecf45-4a69-4cff-bbb2-fd6c7eaf0569&sKey=KeyRemoved
    >
    > Reply to Discussion : http://my.ptg.org/eGroups/PostReply/?GroupId=43&MID=697544&MDATE=756%253e45645%253b&UserKey=3feecf45-4a69-4cff-bbb2-fd6c7eaf0569&sKey=KeyRemoved
    >
    >
    >
    > You are subscribed to "Pianotech" as hgreeley@sonic.net. To change your subscriptions, go to http://my.ptg.org/preferences?section=Subscriptions&MDATE=756%253e45645%253b&UserKey=3feecf45-4a69-4cff-bbb2-fd6c7eaf0569&sKey=KeyRemoved. To unsubscribe from this community discussion, go to http://my.ptg.org/HigherLogic/eGroups/Unsubscribe.aspx?UserKey=3feecf45-4a69-4cff-bbb2-fd6c7eaf0569&sKey=KeyRemoved&GroupKey=2bb4ebe8-4dba-4640-ae67-111903beaddf.
    >




  • 95.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-08-2019 10:35

    In this respect I think creating a "Stein-was" (what the piano originally was) might be preferable to a "Stein-is". 

     

    Apropos to this I had a discussion recently with a customer who needed to replace hammers on a 1930s Steinway B.  As I usually do, we sample hammers so I could demonstrate side by side comparisons.  Among those samples was a current production Steinway hammer, an old pristine period hammer, a Ronsen low profile hammer (Wurzen) and a Renner Blue Point.  The hammers on this piano were original but pretty worn. We sampled mid tenor, mid first capo and mid bass. 

     

    From the sampling test the order of preference went:

     

    Original period hammer

    Ronsen Low profile hammer (Wurzen)

    Renner Blue Point

    Current Steinway hammer. 

     

    The Ronsen Low Profile Wurzen was, in their opinion (and mine) the closest thing to the original period hammer.

     

    This opinion was furthered by their experience playing some new Stein-is pianos that they felt were, as they said, "muffled, muted and lacking in tonal clarity." 

     

    In the best interest of the customer who wished to recreate the Stein-was, as it "was" in 1930, we went with the Ronsen hammer. 

     

    David Love

    www.davidlovepianos.com

    415 407 8320

     






  • 96.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-07-2019 09:07
    Peter G. responded: "As I stated, they remanufacture the pianos according to 2018/2019 thinking and specs, regardless of what specs (and the reasoning for them) went into that 1917 (or whatever) instrument." SNIP

    "There is value in being able to do this and do it well. It's not always about the "latest and the greatest", but rather the ability to recreate what WAS, if that is what the client wants. This is what we specialize in, and Steinway does not. They want to force everyone into a predetermined mold (today's mold). That is NOT restoration (at least in my book).  Anyone is free to disagree with this point of view..."

    Thanks for the response Peter. I am certainly not disagreeing with you, but rather trying to understand. I don't see very many new Steinways in my practice, so I may just be unfamiliar with newer ones. I guess perhaps what I don't understand is what is the difference between how a new Steinway sounded in 1917 VS. how a new one sounds in recent years. I understand that there have been a few design changes, most notably the tapering of the panels starting when, maybe in the 1930s or so? But other than that, how would a 1917 Steinway grand that was remanufactured in the Steinway factory today differ from that same piano when it was new in 1917?

    That is something I am simply unfamiliar with.

    ------------------------------
    Terry Farrell
    Farrell Piano Service, Inc.
    Brandon, Florida
    terry@farrellpiano.com
    813-684-3505
    ------------------------------



  • 97.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-07-2019 11:11
    Well, since my dad was only 1 year old in 1917 it is quite impossible for me to be dogmatic on that subject. 😁

    Steinway would doubtlessly say that the new Steinways are superior to those made in 1917...that they were great then, but they are even greater now.  For the sake of discussion, lets assume that's true.  Then when a person visits a Steinway showroom they should be WOWED as they move from piano to piano in the showroom while the salesperson stands by silently waiting for them to pick one of these mind blowing instruments and pull out their checkbook to pay for their favorite one (but it's so hard to decide because they're all so fantastic).

    Somehow I just don't think that's the way it goes normally...maybe occasionally, but probably not the rule. It's more likely that they are wondering why these pianos cost so much yet don't seem to be that impressive. 

    This is essentially the standard that Steinway would remanufacture that 1917 instrument to. I have personally seen several Steinways "restored" at the factory (when I was in DC...not up here in NH) and I was quite unimpressed with what I saw and played. They looked nice (though not as nice as 1917) but were quite lackluster in performance. Certainly NOT representative of what I believe those instruments sounded like in their formative years.

    OTOH the independent rebuilder/restorer has the ability to offer choices to the client (and hopefully the skill to apply them) that come much closer to how it sounded then. Hammers made with essentially the same felt and proportioned closer to the originals are likely to produce a more authentic sound than current stock factory hammers, strike point customized to that particular piano (something they used to do back then often) is likely to do same, wire that more resembles what was used then likely to do same, etc. etc.

    If the client has a desire to approach things this way, the factory is NOT going to do it. If the client doesn't care, but simply wants a certificate for their file that says it was "restored" at the factory, and they have the money to do it...great! Send it on down. Let them do their thing. I have no problem with that.  But if they are THINKING that by sending it to the "restoration department" at the factory, that they are going to have it restored to its ORIGINAL condition, they are likely to be disappointed.

    This all remains an opinion...however one that is based on observation of actual fact. Yes, I know there are "rebuilders" out there that do very poor work. But this true in every trade everywhere, and this is disappointing, but it's part of what some call a free market economy. It goes with the territory. If the results of poor workmanship was life threatening (such as electical, plumbing, home construction, etc.) then it would make sense to establish legal standards that all must adhere to or else end up in court. But it's rare for someone to die from playing their poorly repaired piano. They are simply disappointed and out some money.

    I am 99% sure that Steinway used to restore pianos at the factory even way back then (can anyone confirm this?). I recall seeing an A from like 1875 that (as the story was) went back to the factory in the teens and was "rebuilt" and came back to the family. When I first saw it I closely examined the stringing which was so factory perfect that I had a hard time believing that it had been restrung. Then I measured the pins and found them to be 3/0 pins.  Then I started looking at all the other aspects and found more evidence of rebuilding (to a very high standard!) If that standard was indicative of the standards at the factory today, I doubt I would be saying any of this. But sadly it doesn't seem to be the same. However there are independent rebuilders who DO hold their work to this kind of standard and care enough to do their best to truly restore pianos to the fine standard that the factory was once known for. They should not be kicked out of the marketplace under the disguise of trademark projection.

    BTW, I'm sitting waiting for my car to have a recall issue fixed. That's why I have time to drone on and on like this. 

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 98.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-07-2019 12:49
    Peter G. responded:
    "Well, since my dad was only 1 year old in 1917 it is quite impossible for me to be dogmatic on that subject. 😁

    Steinway would doubtlessly say that the new Steinways are superior to those made in 1917...that they were great then, but they are even greater now.  For the sake of discussion, lets assume that's true.  Then when a person visits a Steinway showroom they should be WOWED as they move from piano to piano in the showroom while the salesperson stands by silently waiting for them to pick one of these mind blowing instruments and pull out their checkbook to pay for their favorite one (but it's so hard to decide because they're all so fantastic).

    Somehow I just don't think that's the way it goes normally...maybe occasionally, but probably not the rule. It's more likely that they are wondering why these pianos cost so much yet don't seem to be that impressive."

    I would generally agree with what you have stated above.

    "This is essentially the standard that Steinway would remanufacture that 1917 instrument to. I have personally seen several Steinways "restored" at the factory (when I was in DC...not up here in NH) and I was quite unimpressed with what I saw and played. They looked nice (though not as nice as 1917) but were quite lackluster in performance. Certainly NOT representative of what I believe those instruments sounded like in their formative years."

    I think this may be where I am going with my comments. What did those instruments sound like in 1917? Did shoppers go to the Steinway dealer in 1917 and get "WOWED as they move from piano to piano in the showroom while the salesperson stands by silently waiting for them to pick one of these mind blowing instruments and pull out their checkbook to pay for their favorite one (but it's so hard to decide because they're all so fantastic)."?

    If the designs today are largely unchanged since 1917 or whenever, why would new S&S pianos in 1917 sound all that different from new Steinways today? Or from S&S factory remanufactured pianos today? I have little doubt that some of the workmanship is probably a bit lower today than back in the day, but the designs are essentially the same.

    My experience is that one may see some percentage of new pianos in a S&S showroom sounding excellent, some sounding decent and some sounding not so great. I suspect that was generally the case in 1917 also - maybe a higher percentage of the better ones, but still a spread. Such a spread is inherent in their design and construction - is was then and still is now.

    I guess I still don't understand why folks seem to think that S&S pianos were the kitty's tushy way back when and today they are unimpressive. I suspect they have changes less than many folks seem to think.

    ------------------------------
    Terry Farrell
    Farrell Piano Service, Inc.
    Brandon, Florida
    terry@farrellpiano.com
    813-684-3505
    ------------------------------



  • 99.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-07-2019 13:16
    Borrowing from Jeff Foxworthy here, but

    If you claim to know exactly what a Steinway sounded like in 1917, you might be a piano rebuilder 


    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 100.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-07-2019 14:07
    Contained in that post is something I've heard countless times in the past 13 years and likely the very same sentiment that led to this decision by Steinway:

    "However there are independent rebuilders who DO hold their work to this kind of standard and care enough to do their best to truly restore pianos to the fine standard that the factory was once known for"

    aside from a conjecture reliant claim about standards in 1917 vs 2019...

    You see what is being said here is that somehow independent rebuilders are more entitled to the "Steinwayness" that made Steinway famous than Steinway itself.

    Im curious what these independent rebuilders who are so faithful to the craftsmanship of the 1917 Steinway do with the back action. Must they glue the flanges to the tray?

    ------------------------------
    Daniel DeBiasio
    Brooklyn, NY
    646.801.8863
    ------------------------------



  • 101.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-07-2019 14:18
    The classic example of Steinway's "restoration" would be the Horowitz D, which they sent on a tour of Stwy dealerships in 1991(?), which I saw at Steinert's in Boston. No mention was made as to which of his pianos it was, the favorite of his two at C&A, the less favorite, or the one from his apartment. But there it was for any pianist, student, amateur or professional, eager for the chance to lay fingers on "the" piano whose sound they're so enjoyed during his lifetime.

    And there it was, no different a product than any of the Ds coming from the factory (instead of the Restoration center). Gone was the original board, the hammers doped and filed down to the nub, and shank centers so loose the hammers literally "danced their way up to the strings" (as Joe Bisceglie described it). On his chosen piano, only he could get a musical sound. The piano on this tour and touted as "his", he would have rejected with a hissing fit. But there it was, his piano, restored as the Restoration Center would and a sorry fraud for anyone who wanted to experience "his piano".

    ------------------------------
    William Ballard RPT
    WBPS
    Saxtons River VT
    802-869-9107

    "Our lives contain a thousand springs
    and dies if one be gone
    Strange that a harp of a thousand strings
    should keep in tune so long."
    ...........Dr. Watts, "The Continental Harmony,1774
    +++++++++++++++++++++
    ------------------------------



  • 102.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-07-2019 19:43
    The Steinway factory is certainly capable of turning out some super nice instruments. I know of several. No debate in that arena. 

    And, if they had stopped at saying: 'we are no longer licensing Decals Unlimited to produce Steinway decals, nor anyone else at this time', it really wouldn't be so bad IMO. In fact it could be understandable even. But paragraph 4 of "The Letter" really kicks things up a couple of notches into the realm of monopolistic control with a really heavy hand...almost to the point of unbelievability. Like a monster rising from the lagoon...

    Well anyway, I can't say from experience how good they sounded back in 1917. I wasn't there, and I don't know anyone now who was there. But I will say that I just restored a Model A from 1897 and had to throw away the pathetic 1970's genuine Steinway action parts that had been installed around then. The great grandson of the original buyer is enjoying it very much...AND YES, it does have new genuine Steinway action parts in it now at his request.  He loves it. Soon to begin on his grandmother's B from about 1908 or something like that. It was clearly an awesome instrument then, and will be again. Yes, I already ordered the parts from Steinway. They are on the shelf. 

    Pwg

    Edit: And I ordered the decal while it was still legal. 

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 103.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Posted 01-08-2019 00:04
    One of the best pianos i ever heard was a SS C. All original from (I guess) the 1890's.  Hammers were deeply grooved, strings showed signs of rust, soundboard had a couple of minor cracks. Plate was hand decorated. Just had a depth and richness and character that stood out from hundreds of others, even through age and mechanical problems.  Steinway changed to the diaphramatic soundboard in the 30's, i wonder if that has something to do with the perception the older ones were better sounding.

    As I've reiterated many times, the rib structure / panel grading, has a lot to do with the depth and richness. My observation has been that the ok sounding Steinways have a taller rib structure, and the better sounding ones have a lower rib structure. About a 10% difference.  I use to think it was by accident. Now days i think it's intentional as i have many examples documented to support my hypothesis. Another thing i have noticed is that the panel thicknesses of the diaphramatic soundboards vary. Some are thinner than others. The thinner they are, the quicker they "implode". The latest one was roughly a 1/4" thick throughout and all the ribs were seperated from the panel. Popped out with one hit with a 2 x 4. Love that 100 year old crispy glue, makes my job easier.

    ------------------------------
    Just Looking through the Go-Bars
    chernobieffpiano.com
    grandpianoman@protonmail.com
    Knoxville, TN
    865-986-7720
    ------------------------------



  • 104.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-08-2019 04:54
    Well, Peter, don't let me see that piano in your shop. If I notice that the front rail punchings are non-Steinway, I'm gonna rat on you big time to the Steinway Violater department.  I hear they got some real Goonzilla lawyers there. 

    I hope I can meet someone from Steinway soon so that I can get on bended knee to kiss their ring and swear fealty.  I just love groveling before my betters!

    Will Truitt

    ------------------------------
    William Truitt
    Bridgewater NH
    603-744-2277
    ------------------------------



  • 105.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-08-2019 08:44
    Yes Will,

    I understand you will need to report me to the SS (Steinway & Sons) police. My underground bunker is ready. I am barricading the entrance with unauthorized "illegal" pinblock material (though it probably originated in the same area that the "legal but unobtainable" stuff came from). You will have difficulty getting through that barricade but...Catch me if you can!

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 106.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-08-2019 11:27
    Thanks for your informative posts, Peter. Could you give us some details on the new S&S parts? I'm especially curious about knuckle placement and hammer weight. Does the action ratio work out well with the new parts?

    Yours,

    Bob Anderson, RPT
    Tucson, AZ

    PS: Shameless plug for the 2019 PTG annual convention in Tucson, July 10-13.




  • 107.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Member
    Posted 01-08-2019 12:20
    So where does this leave the high end rebuilders in terms of getting sued by Steinway for putting the decal they bought in advance of rebuilds when they put a new soundboard in and used non S & S genuine parts in the top action, replaced block, got strings made etc I believe the customer is aware in most situations that they have the option of all S&S parts or parts equal to/better than and less expensive. . Item 5 in the PTG Code of Ethics states that " I will render the best possible service under the circumstances always keeping the best interests of my client in mind " . Isn't that exactly what we do when we recommend a different hammer felt or parts and that we know will improve the piano and add value for the customer ? Maybe requiring a decal to be applied on a plate strut . In my opinion this is all nonsense. By all means go after the real abusers but leave the true craftsmen alone- it is hard enough to make a living at work that people want but few are willing to pay for.
    Go after the decal "rebuilders" who slap decals on the fallboards and/or soundboards of low end pianos as well as  counter-fitters who duplicate tools made by companies like Schaff sold on e-bay   . As a final thought think what happens when you need to purchase a costly part for your car. You can buy OEM at a steep price or get something most likely re-manufactured at 1/3. I for one am not going to drop a dime on a Steinway that may have mixed parts in it but I have no problem if the piano is a decal dog






    ------------------------------
    James Kelly
    Pawleys Island SC
    843-325-4357
    ------------------------------



  • 108.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-08-2019 22:00
    James,

    Its a no-brainer to go after the true counterfeiters. What puzzles (or sorely irritates) me is the fact that Steinway never put any procedure in place to track where their decals were going. 

    Then again, maybe they did and DU did not follow through on their end of the agreement. However, if that were the case I would have thought that Steinway would have yanked the license from them long ago. In fact trademark law requires the owner of the trademark to vigorously protect their trademark THEMSELVES and not leave it up to any licensee to do so. 

    Therefore, if in fact Steinway made NO effort to track these things all these years, then they themselves were profiting from the sale of decals being sold to counterfeiters, considering that they were getting a cut on each and every Steinway decal sold (since that is almost universally how licencing works).

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 109.  RE: Rebuilder Decal Options

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-08-2019 22:18
    Bob,

    I had no problems with the factory parts. Things worked smoothly, in fact a little too smoothly in that I made an executive decision to replace the brass capstans with WNG "alumi-stans" BEFORE installing the action parts, and the leverage from the 17mm knuckle placement combined with the lowered back weight resulted in my having to do more key rebalancing than I had anticipated. That decision I made was based on what was already occurring with the 70's "genuine junk" that was on the stack previously. It played like a truck and I made an assumption (yes, I know what assumptions do to you and me) which turned out to be overkill. 

    However, I was able to remove some significant lead from the keys (forced to) which ultimately proved to be great. He comments regularly at how even and predictable the action is now, and how his playing has benefited from it. So its all good. I won't make the same blunder on his B though, but will determine ahead if it's really needed.

    And BTW, no issues on quality of the new parts. They are quite good. Same on a previous M where the owner specified factory parts. No problems at all. 

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------