PianoTech Archive

Expand all | Collapse all

Ron Falcone piano tuning course

  • 1.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 02-21-2010 19:04
    From Don <pianotuna@accesscomm.ca>
    
    Hi all,
    
    Does anyone know anything about this course?
    
    http://www.pianotuning-course.com/index.html
    Regards,
    Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
    Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat
    
    mailto:pianotuna@yahoo.com	http://www.donrose.ca/
    
    3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7
    306-539-0716 
    


  • 2.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-21-2010 18:33
    From PAULREVENKOJONES@aol.com
    
    >From the website, just about all I need to know, thanks!
     
    P
     
     
    In a message dated 2/21/2010 7:05:30 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
    pianotuna@accesscomm.ca writes:
    
    Hi  all,
    
    Does anyone know anything about this  course?
    
    http://www.pianotuning-course.com/index.html
    Regards,
    Don  Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
    Non calor sed umor est qui nobis  incommodat
    
    mailto:pianotuna@yahoo.com   http://www.donrose.ca/
    
    3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S  5G7
    306-539-0716 
    


  • 3.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-21-2010 18:42
    From Avery <ptuner1@gmail.com>
    
    And even includes a Seico electronic tuner! Wow! -:)
    
    On Feb 21, 2010, at 7:33 PM, PAULREVENKOJONES@aol.com wrote:
    
    > From the website, just about all I need to know, thanks!
    >
    > P
    >
    > In a message dated 2/21/2010 7:05:30 P.M. Central Standard Time, pianotuna@accesscomm.ca 
    >  writes:
    > Hi all,
    >
    > Does anyone know anything about this course?
    >
    > http://www.pianotuning-course.com/index.html
    > Regards,
    > Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
    > Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat
    >
    > mailto:pianotuna@yahoo.com  http://www.donrose.ca/
    >
    > 3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7
    > 306-539-0716
    


  • 4.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-21-2010 20:57
    From Terry Farrell <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
    
    Wow, I guess we've all seen the last of Randy.   :-)
    
    Terry Farrell
    
    On Feb 21, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Avery wrote:
    
    > And even includes a Seico electronic tuner! Wow! -:)
    >
    > On Feb 21, 2010, at 7:33 PM, PAULREVENKOJONES@aol.com wrote:
    >
    >> From the website, just about all I need to know, thanks!
    >>
    >> P
    >>
    >> In a message dated 2/21/2010 7:05:30 P.M. Central Standard Time, pianotuna@accesscomm.ca 
    >>  writes:
    >> Hi all,
    >>
    >> Does anyone know anything about this course?
    >>
    >> http://www.pianotuning-course.com/index.html
    >> Regards,
    >> Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
    >> Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat
    >>
    >> mailto:pianotuna@yahoo.com  http://www.donrose.ca/
    >>
    >> 3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7
    >> 306-539-0716
    


  • 5.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-21-2010 20:52
    From Duaine Hechler <dahechler@att.net>
    
    WHERE, in California and New York - most definitely NOT in the midwest -
    like St. Louis, MO
    
    "According to the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics, piano tuners can
    earn very good incomes. In fact, in a recently published almanac on
    career opportunities, piano tuners were listed in the/ *top twenty* /*
    professions* out of a total of/ two hundred/. Probably the best kept
    secret in the world is that now you can join the small and exclusive
    list of tuners who earn an average of *$75.00 to $95.00 *per-hour tuning
    pianos! "
    
    The person that wrote this MUST be on DRUGS ..............
    
    I just LOVE these general statements. (Like the government is trying to
    tell us that the housing market is rebounding - again, NOT in St. Louis, MO)
    
    DH
    
    Don wrote:
    > Hi all,
    >
    > Does anyone know anything about this course?
    >
    > http://www.pianotuning-course.com/index.html
    > Regards,
    > Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
    > Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat
    >
    > mailto:pianotuna@yahoo.com	http://www.donrose.ca/
    >
    > 3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S 5G7
    > 306-539-0716 
    >
    >   
    
    
    -- 
    Duaine Hechler
    Piano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
    Tuning, Servicing & Rebuilding
    Reed Organ Society Member
    Florissant, MO 63034
    (314) 838-5587
    dahechler@att.net
    www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com
    --
    Home & Business user of Linux - 10 years
    


  • 6.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-21-2010 22:06
      |   view attached
    From David Pritchard <david@davidpritchard.com>
    
    I hate it when people try to do something music related, and they obviously know nothing about music.  The above graphic is on that piano tuning website.  The first and last "notes" are obviously not anything you would find on a page of music....
    
    How many times do you see graphics on T-shirts sold at music stores where there are strange things like 4 and 1/2 beats in measure 1 and 7 and 1/4 beats in the next...?
    
    By the way, the G# in a C9(#5) chord makes me smile :-)  
    
    David
    Scottsbluff, Nebraska
    
    > 
    > Don wrote:
    >> Hi all,
    >> 
    >> Does anyone know anything about this course?
    >> 
    >> http://www.pianotuning-course.com/index.html
    >> Regards,
    >> Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
    > 
    


  • 7.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 01:14
    From Rob McCall <rob@mccallpiano.com>
    
    David,
    
    Okay, I'll bite...  I couldn't find the reference to this chord on the website, and G# is the (#5) of the C9 chord... so...?
    
    Is this just your personal favorite, because you like jazzy sounding augmented chords, or am I missing something?
    
    I know it's probably the latter, and I'm just setting up for my eventual and perpetual embarrassment, but I had to ask!
    
    Regards,
    
    Rob McCall
    McCall Piano Service, LLC
    Murrieta, CA
    
    rob@mccallpiano.com
    www.mccallpiano.com
    951-698-1875
    
    
    
    On Feb 21, 2010, at 21:06 , David Pritchard wrote:
    
    > By the way, the G# in a C9(#5) chord makes me smile :-)  
    > 
    > David
    > Scottsbluff, Nebraska
    > 
    >> 
    


  • 8.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 06:33
    From David Pritchard <david@davidpritchard.com>
    
    I just like cool jazz chords.  I used to put strange sentences like that on my facebook page and all my old music major friends from college would comment on what a theory geek I was :-)
    
    For instance,  "I'm in a slightly dissonant mood today.  Kinda like a Cmin7(b5) chord, or perhaps more like a C?7 chord. I just can't decide...."
    
    David
    
    
    On Feb 22, 2010, at 1:14 AM, Rob McCall wrote:
    
    > David,
    > 
    > Okay, I'll bite...  I couldn't find the reference to this chord on the website, and G# is the (#5) of the C9 chord... so...?
    > 
    > Is this just your personal favorite, because you like jazzy sounding augmented chords, or am I missing something?
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > On Feb 21, 2010, at 21:06 , David Pritchard wrote:
    > 
    >> By the way, the G# in a C9(#5) chord makes me smile :-)  
    >> 
    >> David
    >> Scottsbluff, Nebraska
    >> 
    >>> 
    > 
    


  • 9.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 12:54
    From Rob McCall <rob@mccallpiano.com>
    
    Cool...  I'm in a C7(b9, #11) kind of mood today myself. :-)
    
    Regards,
    
    Rob McCall
    
    
    On Feb 22, 2010, at 05:33 , David Pritchard wrote:
    
    > I just like cool jazz chords.  I used to put strange sentences like that on my facebook page and all my old music major friends from college would comment on what a theory geek I was :-)
    > 
    > For instance,  "I'm in a slightly dissonant mood today.  Kinda like a Cmin7(b5) chord, or perhaps more like a C?7 chord. I just can't decide...."
    > 
    > David
    > 
    > 
    > On Feb 22, 2010, at 1:14 AM, Rob McCall wrote:
    > 
    >> David,
    >> 
    >> Okay, I'll bite...  I couldn't find the reference to this chord on the website, and G# is the (#5) of the C9 chord... so...?
    >> 
    >> Is this just your personal favorite, because you like jazzy sounding augmented chords, or am I missing something?
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> On Feb 21, 2010, at 21:06 , David Pritchard wrote:
    >> 
    >>> By the way, the G# in a C9(#5) chord makes me smile :-)  
    >>> 
    >>> David
    >>> Scottsbluff, Nebraska
    >>> 
    >>>> 
    >> 
    > 
    


  • 10.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 14:05
    From "Kerry" <kerrykean@att.net>
    
    Some days I?m augmented, some days I?m diminished :-(, but I haven?t been a
    minor for a long, long time?
    
     
    
    Kerry Kean
    
    www.ohiopianotuner.com <http://www.ohiopianotuner.com/> 
    
     
    
      _____  
    
    From: Rob McCall [mailto:rob@mccallpiano.com] 
    Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 2:54 PM
    To: pianotech@ptg.org
    Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ron Falcone piano tuning course
    
     
    
    Cool...  I'm in a C7(b9, #11) kind of mood today myself. :-)
    
     
    
    Regards,
    
     
    
    Rob McCall
    
     
    
     
    
    On Feb 22, 2010, at 05:33 , David Pritchard wrote:
    
    
    
    
    
    I just like cool jazz chords.  I used to put strange sentences like that on
    my facebook page and all my old music major friends from college would
    comment on what a theory geek I was :-)
    
     
    
    For instance,  "I'm in a slightly dissonant mood today.  Kinda like a
    Cmin7(b5) chord, or perhaps more like a C?7 chord. I just can't decide...."
    
     
    
    David
    
     
    
     
    
    On Feb 22, 2010, at 1:14 AM, Rob McCall wrote:
    
    
    
    
    
    David,
    
     
    
    Okay, I'll bite...  I couldn't find the reference to this chord on the
    website, and G# is the (#5) of the C9 chord... so...?
    
     
    
    Is this just your personal favorite, because you like jazzy sounding
    augmented chords, or am I missing something?
    
     
    
     
    
     
    
    On Feb 21, 2010, at 21:06 , David Pritchard wrote:
    
    
    
    
    
    By the way, the G# in a C9(#5) chord makes me smile :-)  
    
     
    
    David
    
    Scottsbluff, Nebraska
    
     
    
     
    
     
    
     
    
     
    


  • 11.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 02-22-2010 05:45
      |   view attached
    From Conrad Hoffsommer <choffsommer@hotmail.com>
    
    I dunno.  Looks like some of the scribblings I made during a dictation exercise/quiz in a sight screeching course.
    
    Conrad Hoffsommer
    
    
    
    
    From: david@davidpritchard.com
    Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:06:26 -0700
    To: pianotech@ptg.org
    Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ron Falcone piano tuning course
    
    
    
    I hate it when people try to do something music related, and they obviously know nothing about music.  The above graphic is on that piano tuning website.  The first and last "notes" are obviously not anything you would find on a page of music....
    How many times do you see graphics on T-shirts sold at music stores where there are strange things like 4 and 1/2 beats in measure 1 and 7 and 1/4 beats in the next...?
    By the way, the G# in a C9(#5) chord makes me smile :-)  
    DavidScottsbluff, Nebraska
    
    Don wrote:
    Hi all,
    
    Does anyone know anything about this course?
    
    http://www.pianotuning-course.com/index.html
    Regards,
    Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
    
    
     		 	   		  


  • 12.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 05:53
      |   view attached
    From "Gerald Groot" <tunerboy3@comcast.net>
    
    Boy, what a bunch of um, $695 includes the tuning supplies?  Wow.  Home
    study course!  Fantastic!  NOT!  
    
     
    
    From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf
    Of David Pritchard
    Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 12:06 AM
    To: pianotech@ptg.org
    Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ron Falcone piano tuning course
    
     
    
    
    bounce1
    
    
    I hate it when people try to do something music related, and they obviously
    know nothing about music.  The above graphic is on that piano tuning
    website.  The first and last "notes" are obviously not anything you would
    find on a page of music....
    
     
    
    How many times do you see graphics on T-shirts sold at music stores where
    there are strange things like 4 and 1/2 beats in measure 1 and 7 and 1/4
    beats in the next...?
    
     
    
    By the way, the G# in a C9(#5) chord makes me smile :-)  
    
     
    
    David
    
    Scottsbluff, Nebraska
    
     
    
    
    Don wrote:
    
    
    
    Hi all,
    
     
    
    Does anyone know anything about this course?
    
     
    
    http://www.pianotuning-course.com/index.html
    
    Regards,
    
    Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
    
     
    
     
    


  • 13.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 04:57
    From "Kerry" <kerrykean@att.net>
    
    I've been wondering what happened to the folks who dreamed up the Storytone
    soundboard, Harm-i-tone action, Unitized Construction,
    Mezzo-Thermal-Stabilized Soundboard and others I can't remember...
    
    Now we have the "AUDIO INTERACTIVE FEATURE" and the "VISUAL INSTRUCTIONAL
    WRITING". And it's "WRITTEN BY AN ESTABLISHED, PUBLISHED AUTHOR", whoever
    that might be. 
    
    Glad to see they found new work...
    
    
    Kerry Kean
    www.ohiopianotuner.com
    
    


  • 14.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 07:10
    From Brian Trout <brian_trout@hotmail.com>
    
    Don't ya just love carefully crafted ad copy?
    
     
    
    By reading the part that says, "...tuners who earn an average of $75.00 to $95.00 per-hour tuning pianos", many people would assume that piano tuners average $75 to $95 per hour by tuning pianos.  Nope.
    
     
    
    Most people would very likely misinterpret the part before it that says, "the small and exclusive list" and reason that to mean an average of all piano tuners.  Wrong again. Yes, there are some who have developed their tuning skills to be able to tune their average piano in about an hour and live in areas where a tuning runs around $100(+/-).  That would be a "small and exclusive list", in a manner of speaking, but would not be an accurate representation of any kind of average of all tuners in North America.  
    
     
    
    Don't ya just love how they change referrence sources so craftily?  They start out with a blanket statement from the US Dept of Labor Statistics that says, "piano tuners can earn very good incomes."  Doesn't mean ALL piano tuners WILL earn very good incomes.  But some CAN.  Not much different than many other fields.  I also notice a specific absense of monetary figures from official sources.
    
     
    
    And then, they immediately go on to quote "a recently published almanac".  Huh???  What the heck is that?  It could be a term paper from a fourth grader.  It could be a post on a blog somewhere that these same people put out just to satisfy this statement.  It's a "nothing" statement, and a "published almanac" can pretty much say anything, BS included, and all they're doing is saying that it's been published recently.  Duh.  (I could publish my story of oceanfront property in AZ, too, and even put a referrence to it in ad copy somewhere.  Doesn't put an ocean there.)
    
     
    
    Here's just hoping that people looking to learn about piano tuning will do enough searching on the internet to find some reputable people to talk to.  Lots of tuner/techs have real websites now and if I were looking, I'd probably try to find some of these and talk to some real techs for their take on "schools" like this.  And hopefully, some real techs would point would-be people in more reasonable directions of education.  
    
     
    
    If I had to start over again, I'd probably join the PTG and look for a place to start working on pianos.  A mentor would be great.  If not possible, a large piano store with a substantial shop would be a place to do some serious learning.  Even just finding access to a decade or so of the PTG journals would hold a wealth of info for someone willing to do some reading.  
    
     
    
    These "home study courses", at least of this nature, are totally worthless.  I took one in the early 1980's.  Totally worthless.  Well, except for the tuning hammer they sent with it.  I still have that, and even use it on occasion for a tuning pin in a tight location.  I may even have a rubber mute or two, but that's about all I have to show for it.  The actual tuning part of it tried to teach a temperament that was so bad I don't think I ever got it to work well.  I even tried it after learning to tune a good one years later, still couldn't make it work.  (The temperament that finally "clicked" with me was an adaptation and expansion of the one in a book I managed to find, "A Guide to Restringing".  For me, it never was an issue hearing the beats, it was just knowing how to organize them.)
    
     
    
    I don't know if there are some legitimate home study applications these days.  (Is Randy Potter still doing one?)  But this ain't one!!
    
     
    
    FWIW...  just an opinion...
    
     
    
    Brian
    
     
    
     
    > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:51:53 -0600
    > From: dahechler@att.net
    > To: pianotech@ptg.org
    > Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ron Falcone piano tuning course
    > 
    > WHERE, in California and New York - most definitely NOT in the midwest -
    > like St. Louis, MO
    > 
    > "According to the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics, piano tuners can
    > earn very good incomes. In fact, in a recently published almanac on
    > career opportunities, piano tuners were listed in the/ *top twenty* /*
    > professions* out of a total of/ two hundred/. Probably the best kept
    > secret in the world is that now you can join the small and exclusive
    > list of tuners who earn an average of *$75.00 to $95.00 *per-hour tuning
    > pianos! "
    > 
    > The person that wrote this MUST be on DRUGS ..............
    > 
    > I just LOVE these general statements. (Like the government is trying to
    > tell us that the housing market is rebounding - again, NOT in St. Louis, MO)
    > 
    > DH
    > 
     		 	   		  
    _________________________________________________________________
    Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection.
    http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/


  • 15.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 11:23
    From "Kerry" <kerrykean@att.net>
    
    I could accept potential value for a mail-order course, especially for
    someone in a remote setting, if they were honest about the prospects and the
    fact that the course by itself would be just an introduction. This one is
    not. 
    
     
    
    I emailed them asking details about this Ron Falcone (anybody know him?),
    his background, training, etc., and was simply referred back to the site's
    FAQ. Googling him turned up someone who matches his background (author for
    the listed publishers, lived in Connecticut, moved to Orlando FL in the
    90's), except this guy is a alternative medical journalist who has been the
    editor of a bacterial cancer website for the last 10 years (I emailed to ask
    if they were the same guy, no response yet). Hmm, either a true Renaissance
    man or he moves from field to field when things get too hot.
    
     
    
    Here are the bios to compare if anyone else is interested.
    
     
    
    http://www.pianotuning-course.com/ronfalcone.html
    
    http://www.cancerbacteria.com/falcone.html
    
     
    
     
    
     
    
    Kerry Kean
    
    www.ohiopianotuner.com <http://www.ohiopianotuner.com/> 
    
     
    
     
    
    <snip> 
    These "home study courses", at least of this nature, are totally worthless.
    I took one in the early 1980's.  Totally worthless.  Well, except for the
    tuning hammer they sent with it.  I still have that, and even use it on
    occasion for a tuning pin in a tight location.  I may even have a rubber
    mute or two, but that's about all I have to show for it.  The actual tuning
    part of it tried to teach a temperament that was so bad I don't think I ever
    got it to work well.  I even tried it after learning to tune a good one
    years later, still couldn't make it work.  (The temperament that finally
    "clicked" with me was an adaptation and expansion of the one in a book I
    managed to find, "A Guide to Restringing".  For me, it never was an issue
    hearing the beats, it was just knowing how to organize them.)
     
    I don't know if there are some legitimate home study applications these
    days.  (Is Randy Potter still doing one?)  But this ain't one!!
     
    FWIW...  just an opinion...
     
    Brian
     
    


  • 16.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 04:52
    From Chuck Behm <behmpiano@gmail.com>
    
    What really impressed me is the picture of the piano parts inventory that
    you would be receiving to start up your business with. You need at least a
    shoebox to keep all that stuff in! If you come across an old Lester with 5
    busted plastic elbows you're set. Those 4 damper spoons will come in handy
    too! As will the one damper flange! All-inclusive, I must say!
    
    My one complaint is the set of 4 upright key buttons. The one on the right
    would have been more useful had they not sawed through the mortise. Chuck
    


  • 17.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 11:46
    From JOHN ROSS <jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca>
    
    Any correspondence course, is only as good as what you put into it.
    After joining PTG, I learned that the course I had completed, was the worst
    course available.
    They are still in business, and I did the course in 1975.
    It did however give me a course outline to work with.
    I have been to approaching 20 conventions, where I filled in the blanks, in
    my knowledge.
    But had I not started with the correspondence course, even the inferior one
    I took, I would not be making a living from it today.
    You can have the best course in the world, but if you don?t apply yourself,
    or just read the answers from the course material, you will fail as a piano
    tuner.
    You must satisfy, the customer, or your business will fail.
    John Ross
    Windsor, Nova Scotia
    
    
    
    On 22/02/10 10:10 AM, "Brian Trout" <brian_trout@hotmail.com> wrote:
    
    > Don't ya just love carefully crafted ad copy?
    >  
    > By reading the part that says, "...tuners who earn an average of $75.00 to
    > $95.00 per-hour tuning pianos", many people would assume that piano tuners
    > average $75 to $95 per hour by tuning pianos.  Nope.
    >  
    > Most people would very likely misinterpret the part before it that says, "the
    > small and exclusive list" and reason that to mean an average of all piano
    > tuners.  Wrong again. Yes, there are some who have developed their tuning
    > skills to be able to tune their average piano in about an hour and live in
    > areas where a tuning runs around $100(+/-).  That would be a "small and
    > exclusive list", in a manner of speaking, but would not be an accurate
    > representation of any kind of average of all tuners in North America.
    >  
    > Don't ya just love how they change referrence sources so craftily?  They start
    > out with a blanket statement from the US Dept of Labor Statistics that says,
    > "piano tuners can earn very good incomes."  Doesn't mean ALL piano tuners WILL
    > earn very good incomes.  But some CAN.  Not much different than many other
    > fields.  I also notice a specific absense of monetary figures from official
    > sources.
    >  
    > And then, they immediately go on to quote "a recently published almanac".
    > Huh???  What the heck is that?  It could be a term paper from a fourth grader.
    > It could be a post on a blog somewhere that these same people put out just to
    > satisfy this statement.  It's a "nothing" statement, and a "published almanac"
    > can pretty much say anything, BS included, and all they're doing is saying
    > that it's been published recently.  Duh.  (I could publish my story of
    > oceanfront property in AZ, too, and even put a referrence to it in ad copy
    > somewhere.  Doesn't put an ocean there.)
    >  
    > Here's just hoping that people looking to learn about piano tuning will do
    > enough searching on the internet to find some reputable people to talk to.
    > Lots of tuner/techs have real websites now and if I were looking, I'd probably
    > try to find some of these and talk to some real techs for their take on
    > "schools" like this.  And hopefully, some real techs would point would-be
    > people in more reasonable directions of education.
    >  
    > If I had to start over again, I'd probably join the PTG and look for a place
    > to start working on pianos.  A mentor would be great.  If not possible, a
    > large piano store with a substantial shop would be a place to do some serious
    > learning.  Even just finding access to a decade or so of the PTG journals
    > would hold a wealth of info for someone willing to do some reading.
    >  
    > These "home study courses", at least of this nature, are totally worthless.  I
    > took one in the early 1980's.  Totally worthless.  Well, except for the tuning
    > hammer they sent with it.  I still have that, and even use it on occasion for
    > a tuning pin in a tight location.  I may even have a rubber mute or two, but
    > that's about all I have to show for it.  The actual tuning part of it tried to
    > teach a temperament that was so bad I don't think I ever got it to work well.
    > I even tried it after learning to tune a good one years later, still couldn't
    > make it work.  (The temperament that finally "clicked" with me was an
    > adaptation and expansion of the one in a book I managed to find, "A Guide to
    > Restringing".  For me, it never was an issue hearing the beats, it was just
    > knowing how to organize them.)
    >  
    > I don't know if there are some legitimate home study applications these days.
    > (Is Randy Potter still doing one?)  But this ain't one!!
    >  
    > FWIW...  just an opinion...
    >  
    > Brian
    >  
    >  
    >> > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:51:53 -0600
    >> > From: dahechler@att.net
    >> > To: pianotech@ptg.org
    >> > Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ron Falcone piano tuning course
    >> > 
    >> > WHERE, in California and New York - most definitely NOT in the midwest -
    >> > like St. Louis, MO
    >> > 
    >> > "According to the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics, piano tuners can
    >> > earn very good incomes. In fact, in a recently published almanac on
    >> > career opportunities, piano tuners were listed in the/ *top twenty* /*
    >> > professions* out of a total of/ two hundred/. Probably the best kept
    >> > secret in the world is that now you can join the small and exclusive
    >> > list of tuners who earn an average of *$75.00 to $95.00 *per-hour tuning
    >> > pianos! "
    >> > 
    >> > The person that wrote this MUST be on DRUGS ..............
    >> > 
    >> > I just LOVE these general statements. (Like the government is trying to
    >> > tell us that the housing market is rebounding - again, NOT in St. Louis, >>
    MO)
    >> > 
    >> > DH
    >> > 
    >        
    > 
    > Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.
    > <http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/> 
    


  • 18.  Ron Falcone piano tuning course

    Posted 02-22-2010 14:39
    From "Paul McCloud" <pmc033@earthlink.net>
    
    I agree with John.   No one can say after completion of any course,
    correspondence or otherwise, that one will achieve success in that
    particular field.  It is an introduction to an entry-level position.  You
    have to make your own success.  
    
    Before we jump on this guy, let's examine the course material he has
    produced.  Is it going to surpass the full-time technician schools we have
    available?Of course not.  Will it get a newbie into the field making money?
    Apparently, yes it will.  
    
                    As far as his background, it appears he is an accomplished
    writer, as evidenced by his book production.  Whether he has other interests
    or skills is of no concern, but rather shows his intelligence and broad
    scope.  Explaining how to accomplish a task in written form is challenging,
    and he claims to have the ability to do this effectively.  Let's give him
    the benefit of the doubt  until such time we know otherwise.  
    
                    My take.
    
                    Paul McCloud
    
                    San Diego
    
     
    
    From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf
    Of JOHN ROSS
    Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:46 AM
    To: pianotech@ptg.org
    Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ron Falcone piano tuning course
    
     
    
    Any correspondence course, is only as good as what you put into it.
    After joining PTG, I learned that the course I had completed, was the worst
    course available.
    They are still in business, and I did the course in 1975.
    It did however give me a course outline to work with.
    I have been to approaching 20 conventions, where I filled in the blanks, in
    my knowledge.
    But had I not started with the correspondence course, even the inferior one
    I took, I would not be making a living from it today.
    You can have the best course in the world, but if you don't apply yourself,
    or just read the answers from the course material, you will fail as a piano
    tuner.
    You must satisfy, the customer, or your business will fail.
    John Ross
    Windsor, Nova Scotia
    
    
    
    On 22/02/10 10:10 AM, "Brian Trout" <brian_trout@hotmail.com> wrote:
    
    Don't ya just love carefully crafted ad copy?
     
    By reading the part that says, "...tuners who earn an average of $75.00 to
    $95.00 per-hour tuning pianos", many people would assume that piano tuners
    average $75 to $95 per hour by tuning pianos.  Nope.
     
    Most people would very likely misinterpret the part before it that says,
    "the small and exclusive list" and reason that to mean an average of all
    piano tuners.  Wrong again. Yes, there are some who have developed their
    tuning skills to be able to tune their average piano in about an hour and
    live in areas where a tuning runs around $100(+/-).  That would be a "small
    and exclusive list", in a manner of speaking, but would not be an accurate
    representation of any kind of average of all tuners in North America.  
     
    Don't ya just love how they change referrence sources so craftily?  They
    start out with a blanket statement from the US Dept of Labor Statistics that
    says, "piano tuners can earn very good incomes."  Doesn't mean ALL piano
    tuners WILL earn very good incomes.  But some CAN.  Not much different than
    many other fields.  I also notice a specific absense of monetary figures
    from official sources.
     
    And then, they immediately go on to quote "a recently published almanac".
    Huh???  What the heck is that?  It could be a term paper from a fourth
    grader.  It could be a post on a blog somewhere that these same people put
    out just to satisfy this statement.  It's a "nothing" statement, and a
    "published almanac" can pretty much say anything, BS included, and all
    they're doing is saying that it's been published recently.  Duh.  (I could
    publish my story of oceanfront property in AZ, too, and even put a
    referrence to it in ad copy somewhere.  Doesn't put an ocean there.)
     
    Here's just hoping that people looking to learn about piano tuning will do
    enough searching on the internet to find some reputable people to talk to.
    Lots of tuner/techs have real websites now and if I were looking, I'd
    probably try to find some of these and talk to some real techs for their
    take on "schools" like this.  And hopefully, some real techs would point
    would-be people in more reasonable directions of education.  
     
    If I had to start over again, I'd probably join the PTG and look for a place
    to start working on pianos.  A mentor would be great.  If not possible, a
    large piano store with a substantial shop would be a place to do some
    serious learning.  Even just finding access to a decade or so of the PTG
    journals would hold a wealth of info for someone willing to do some reading.
    
     
    These "home study courses", at least of this nature, are totally worthless.
    I took one in the early 1980's.  Totally worthless.  Well, except for the
    tuning hammer they sent with it.  I still have that, and even use it on
    occasion for a tuning pin in a tight location.  I may even have a rubber
    mute or two, but that's about all I have to show for it.  The actual tuning
    part of it tried to teach a temperament that was so bad I don't think I ever
    got it to work well.  I even tried it after learning to tune a good one
    years later, still couldn't make it work.  (The temperament that finally
    "clicked" with me was an adaptation and expansion of the one in a book I
    managed to find, "A Guide to Restringing".  For me, it never was an issue
    hearing the beats, it was just knowing how to organize them.)
     
    I don't know if there are some legitimate home study applications these
    days.  (Is Randy Potter still doing one?)  But this ain't one!!
     
    FWIW...  just an opinion...
     
    Brian
     
     
    > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:51:53 -0600
    > From: dahechler@att.net
    > To: pianotech@ptg.org
    > Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ron Falcone piano tuning course
    > 
    > WHERE, in California and New York - most definitely NOT in the midwest -
    > like St. Louis, MO
    > 
    > "According to the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics, piano tuners can
    > earn very good incomes. In fact, in a recently published almanac on
    > career opportunities, piano tuners were listed in the/ *top twenty* /*
    > professions* out of a total of/ two hundred/. Probably the best kept
    > secret in the world is that now you can join the small and exclusive
    > list of tuners who earn an average of *$75.00 to $95.00 *per-hour tuning
    > pianos! "
    > 
    > The person that wrote this MUST be on DRUGS ..............
    > 
    > I just LOVE these general statements. (Like the government is trying to
    > tell us that the housing market is rebounding - again, NOT in St. Louis,
    MO)
    > 
    > DH
    > 
           
    
      _____  
    
    Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up
    now. <http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/> 
    
    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
    Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2679 - Release Date: 02/22/10
    07:34:00