PianoTech Archive

Expand all | Collapse all

Soundboard drydown for installation, was installation with hide glue

  • 1.  Soundboard drydown for installation, was installation with hide glue

    Posted 01-18-2008 16:09
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Too bad there is a lack of response on this thread Mike.  Seems a good 
    question that more then a few would benefit from some good 
    answers/thoughts.
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
            Richard, I'm glad you asked that.  I too wonder why.  Once the
            ribs are
            on, I can't rationalize a benefit to taking the board outside of
            the
            normal range of (controlled) workshop humidity for installation
            in the
            piano.  Not that I would be surprised to learn of several good
            reasons
            for doing so.  I hope you get some interesting answers.
    
            Mike
    
    
        Richard Brekne wrote:
         >
         > On a general note.. this raises an issue for those of us with less
         > experience installing soundboard. Under what circumstances would one
         > dry out the ribbed assembly for installation in the case ? All
        panels
         > regardless of how crown was achieved ? Whys, whats, and wherefors
         > appreciated.
         >
         >
    


  • 2.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-18-2008 16:29
    From "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
    
    I think this goes back to traditional engineering arch theory. If you dry 
    the board down, it will have a slightly smaller footprint - the ribs will 
    shrink a teeny-weeny bit and at least the top of the panel will shrink. Then 
    if you glue the dried board into a tightly fitting case, when the board 
    takes on moisture and crown develops, the crown will be enhanced because now 
    the board can't expand that little bit (the rib lengths and the top of the 
    panel). So now the case is supporting the crown and the ribs are an arch.
    
    'Course, none of this actually works - the ribs won't shrink much, the panel 
    top edge will just crush when it expands the 1/10 mm that it might move and 
    the rim has enough flex to negate any "arch" support.
    
    But I think the first paragraph above is pretty much the reason the practice 
    persists. And in any case, even if it doesn't have any significant effect, 
    some minimal drying prior to installation is likely to make most any 
    rebuilder sleep better at night because s/he hasn't offended the Goddess of 
    the piano soul.
    
    Terry Farrell
    
    


  • 3.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-18-2008 17:15
    From St?phane Collin <collin.s@skynet.be>
    
    Hi Terry (and Mike, and Ric).
    
    If I get you all right, there is no need for drying the ribbed panel again
    before gluing it in the piano.
    But then, if I understand well, there would be no problem either gluing the
    ribbed board in the piano in a 60 % humidity environment, and let the piano
    undergo severe winters at 28 % either.  Is this what you think ?
    If so, I have to admit I must update my own thoughts (which happens often
    these last days), for example about soundboard cracks causes.
    So all the climate matters are between the ribs and the board (and the
    method of assembling), right ?
    
    By the way, my miserable board did come back to normal shape (after 48
    hours) and is glorious again.  I see no reason anymore to commit suicide
    today.
    
    Best regards.
    
    St?phane Collin.
    
    
    
    'Course, none of this actually works - the ribs won't shrink much, the panel
    
    top edge will just crush when it expands the 1/10 mm that it might move and 
    the rim has enough flex to negate any "arch" support.
    


  • 4.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-18-2008 17:21
    From John Delacour <JD@Pianomaker.co.uk>
    
    At 18:29 -0500 18/1/08, Farrell wrote:
    
    >I think this goes back to traditional engineering arch theory. If 
    >you dry the board down, it will have a slightly smaller footprint 
    >--'Course, none of this actually works - the ribs won't shrink much, 
    >the panel top edge will just crush when it expands the 1/10 mm that 
    >it might move and the rim has enough flex to negate any "arch" 
    >support.
    
    There's drying down and drying down.  The methods used by certain 
    makers result all too often in compression marks that can appear even 
    before delivery to the showrooms.  On the other hand it seems certain 
    that many makers, Bechstein being one of them at least for a long 
    time) fitted the soundboard with too high a moisture content so that 
    sooner or later in places with dry central heating great cracks 
    opened up.  And certain makers (I'm talking here of pre-1910) hit 
    upon just the right moisure content for installation so that cracks 
    in their soundboards are very rare and always due to excessive baking 
    over a long period.
    
    I'd guess that if, as in the case of St?phane's Ciresa board, the 
    board was made to settle with crown at 42% humidity and the board is 
    fitted in the same conditions, then there is very little risk of 
    cracks appearing, wherever it is sent.  As to compression marks, 
    that's mainly a Steinway/Grotrian speciality, and Steinway at least 
    work differently from most.  At Grotrian and many other factories the 
    board is attached to the inner rim before the outer rim is affixed -- 
    not very practical for the restorer but very sensible, in my opinion, 
    for the maker of new pianos.
    
    JD
    


  • 5.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-18-2008 19:03
    From "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
    
    I should think the moisture content of the panel at rib glueup should be 
    much more influential on the propensity of panel cracking rather than the 
    moisture content of the soundboard at installation time.
    
    Terry Farrell
    
    


  • 6.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 01:47
    From John Delacour <JD@Pianomaker.co.uk>
    
    At 21:03 -0500 18/1/08, Farrell wrote:
    
    >I should think the moisture content of the panel at rib glueup 
    >should be much more influential on the propensity of panel cracking 
    >rather than the moisture content of the soundboard at installation 
    >time.
    
    Of course.
    


  • 7.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-18-2008 21:45
    From Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net>
    
    > 'Course, none of this actually works - the ribs won't shrink much, the 
    > panel top edge will just crush when it expands the 1/10 mm that it might 
    > move and the rim has enough flex to negate any "arch" support.
    
    In fact, as my experiment written up for the Journal shows, if 
    the panel is constrained from expanding by a nice firm 
    buttress, the crown won't form at all if it isn't already 
    there in the form of crowned ribs. It ain't an arch. That's 
    pretty much a no-brainer by now.
    
    
    > But I think the first paragraph above is pretty much the reason the 
    > practice persists. And in any case, even if it doesn't have any 
    > significant effect, some minimal drying prior to installation is likely 
    > to make most any rebuilder sleep better at night because s/he hasn't 
    > offended the Goddess of the piano soul.
    
    I've seen (or think I have) what seems to be an amount of 
    "squirm" in soundboard assemblies. Things *move* with MC 
    changes. In anticipation and accommodation of such, I tend to 
    want to fit the panel, rib it, locate and install the bridges, 
    and glue the assembly in at as nearly the same MC as I can 
    manage. When I do this, surprises seem to minimize, and 
    predictability (and peace of mind) increases.
    
    A view from the trenches.
    Ron N
    


  • 8.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 01:37
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Yes... and I get the sense a bit of this is being mixed up here with 
    talk of whatever potential benefits there are to drying down the ribbed 
    assembly just prior to installation in the case.  Concerns about cracks 
    appearing, be they compression spawned or just pulled apart because of 
    too little drying are about how dry the the panel is just prior to 
    ribbing.  I cant see that has anything to do with whatever potential 
    benefit there might be to keeping the thing dry while the ribs glue 
    cures, or re-drying just before you glue the whole thing onto the rim.
    
    I am curious tho to what this bit with Steinway Hamburg is... they said 
    it was <<crucial>> to getting their bridges right.  As it happens I will 
    have the chance soon to ask them again so I will see what I can pump 
    from them.
    
    As for CC ridges in boards made in Europe. This is far from a Steinway / 
    Grotrian phenomenon.  I'd say the greater portion of European produced 
    pianos display this kind of thing nearly in every case. Petrof, 
    Schimmel, Steingr?ber, Seiler...  I've personally talked with their 
    design people and they say outright compression ridges are a sign of a 
    well put together board. All of these and a good deal others also 
    mention figures like 3.5 % EMC before gluing ribs.  Udo Steing?rber just 
    told me in Helsinki in October this is necessary for the European 
    climate... and he also told me they make as tight a fit as is humanly 
    possible in gluing their assemblies into the case.  I will be seeing him 
    again before long as well... so I may get a chance to see them doing 
    what they do first hand.
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
        I should think the moisture content of the panel at rib glueup
        should be
        much more influential on the propensity of panel cracking rather
        than the
        moisture content of the soundboard at installation time.
    
        Terry Farrell
    


  • 9.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 05:57
    From "J Patrick Draine" <jpdraine@gmail.com>
    
    Udo Steingraeber gave a presentation at a Boston PTG gathering this past
    Tuesday evening (n his way to NAMM in Anaheim). An engaging speaker, and
    obviously deeply steeped in generations of his family's technical
    traditions.Udo told us his soundboards are brought down to 4% EMC before
    assembly. While the ribs are straight when glued on, Mr. Steingraeber
    emphasized that the long bridge is attached to the soundboard BEFORE the
    ribbing assembly, and that the bottom of the long bridge is concave,
    resulting in a Bridge Crowned Soundboard before the Compression Crown is
    introduced by the ribs. He indicated compression ridges are more likely if
    the crown isn't first set by his method of attaching the pre-crowned long
    bridge.
    The model 168 he had with him sounded great, and I believe he's introducing
    a 7' 7" semi-concert grand at NAMM.
    Patrick Draine
    
    On Jan 19, 2008 3:37 AM, Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no> wrote:
    
    >
    >
    > As for CC ridges in boards made in Europe. This is far from a Steinway /
    > Grotrian phenomenon.  I'd say the greater portion of European produced
    > pianos display this kind of thing nearly in every case. Petrof,
    > Schimmel, Steingr?ber, Seiler...  I've personally talked with their
    > design people and they say outright compression ridges are a sign of a
    > well put together board. All of these and a good deal others also
    > mention figures like 3.5 % EMC before gluing ribs.  Udo Steing?rber just
    > told me in Helsinki in October this is necessary for the European
    > climate... and he also told me they make as tight a fit as is humanly
    > possible in gluing their assemblies into the case.  I will be seeing him
    > again before long as well... so I may get a chance to see them doing
    > what they do first hand.
    >
    > Cheers
    > RicB
    


  • 10.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 06:30
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Hi Patrick
    
    Sounds like the Udo I know alright. Very deeply committed to the CC 
    board. And yes his pianos are very nice sounding indeed. His small 
    grands are especially impressive sounding for their size.  Did you get a 
    chance to hear anything about the Phoenix grand he is collaborating work 
    on ?
    
    The thing is that here is yet another variation on the theme.  Udo puts 
    the long bridge on the board before ribbing.... and suggests (I suppose 
    he has some data to back this up) that compression ridges are less 
    likely to occur when doing this all else being equal.  Hamburg ribs 
    first using curved ribs and much higher EMC..... and turn around and dry 
    the soundboard to a lower EMC then when ribbed in order to attach the 
    bridge. The bridge is also in the hotbox if I remember right.... but I 
    will check.
    
    Soo.... leaving aside all the rhetoric about universal truths.... what 
    is the reasoning behind these two different approaches... what are they 
    trying to accomplish ? 
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
        Udo Steingraeber gave a presentation at a Boston PTG gathering this past
        Tuesday evening (n his way to NAMM in Anaheim). An engaging speaker, and
        obviously deeply steeped in generations of his family's technical
        traditions.Udo told us his soundboards are brought down to 4% EMC before
        assembly. While the ribs are straight when glued on, Mr. Steingraeber
        emphasized that the long bridge is attached to the soundboard BEFORE the
        ribbing assembly, and that the bottom of the long bridge is concave,
        resulting in a Bridge Crowned Soundboard before the Compression Crown is
        introduced by the ribs. He indicated compression ridges are more
        likely if
        the crown isn't first set by his method of attaching the pre-crowned
        long
        bridge.
        The model 168 he had with him sounded great, and I believe he's
        introducing
        a 7' 7" semi-concert grand at NAMM.
        Patrick Draine
    


  • 11.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 01:50
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    One thing I found interesting about that experiment was that the thing 
    did exactly the opposite of what is popularly thrown around.  We all... 
    (at least I) have heard  countless times that the rim will support and 
    enhance crown as the panel takes on humidity.  But Rons experiment shows 
    that on initial glue in the opposite happens.  I.e.  crown is 
    prevented.  The thing is tho... the panel still is taking on all that 
    humidity...and it still is trying to grow.... so maybe what is REALLY 
    the goal here is to put even more compression into the entire panel.  I 
    keep remembering that CC believers are real fanatic about getting as 
    much <<Tension>> (read stress) into the board as possible over here.  
    There IS some grounds for consideration that goes to how one creates 
    stiffness in an assembly.
    
    One can not deny that CC boards with wide and short ribs do end up with 
    sufficient and more stiffness degrees as any RC board does from the get 
    go.  Since that stiffness is not coming from the ribs in the same 
    sense... then it must be coming at least somewhat from a compressed 
    panel.  Such stiffness would be more uniform over the entire panel.... 
    for whatever that is worth.  So if a dried assembly achieves even that 
    much more compression by also setting the top half of the panel under 
    more compression stress then otherwise... then even more panel stiffness 
    would be achieved.... as long as the panel holds its compression 
    strength anyways.
    
    Just more thoughts.
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
    
             > 'Course, none of this actually works - the ribs won't shrink
            much, the
             > panel top edge will just crush when it expands the 1/10 mm
            that it might
             > move and the rim has enough flex to negate any "arch" support.
    
    
        In fact, as my experiment written up for the Journal shows, if
        the panel is constrained from expanding by a nice firm
        buttress, the crown won't form at all if it isn't already
        there in the form of crowned ribs. It ain't an arch. That's
        pretty much a no-brainer by now.
    
    
             > But I think the first paragraph above is pretty much the
            reason the
             > practice persists. And in any case, even if it doesn't have any
             > significant effect, some minimal drying prior to installation
            is likely
             > to make most any rebuilder sleep better at night because s/he
            hasn't
             > offended the Goddess of the piano soul.
    
    
        I've seen (or think I have) what seems to be an amount of
        "squirm" in soundboard assemblies. Things *move* with MC
        changes. In anticipation and accommodation of such, I tend to
        want to fit the panel, rib it, locate and install the bridges,
        and glue the assembly in at as nearly the same MC as I can
        manage. When I do this, surprises seem to minimize, and
        predictability (and peace of mind) increases.
    
        A view from the trenches.
        Ron N
    


  • 12.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 04:27
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Hi Terry.
    
    This is another bit that has bothered me ever since Ron's experiment 
    article.  On the one hand one states that the edges of the panel will 
    simply crush as it attempts to expand when constrained in the fashion 
    the <<buttressed arch>> idea employs.  Yet Ron reports that the panel 
    thus constrained simply didn't take on any crown. These two strike me as 
    mutually exclusive.  If the edges indeed would simply crush when 
    subjected to such pressure ... then what would prevent his experiment 
    board from crowning ?  If the edges are strong enough to keep the panel 
    from crowning, then it would seem to me that they are strong enough to 
    help support crown if they were first asked to..... which of course is a 
    different question all together.
    
    
        'Course, none of this actually works - the ribs won't shrink much,
        the panel
        top edge will just crush when it expands the 1/10 mm that it might
        move and
        the rim has enough flex to negate any "arch" support.
    
        Terry Farrell
    


  • 13.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 08:45
    From "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
    
    > On the one hand one states that the edges of the panel will simply crush 
    > as it attempts to expand when constrained in the fashion the <<buttressed 
    > arch>> idea employs.
    
    I'm just really pulling that out of you-know-where based on observations. 
    Spruce is very soft. When I'm building panels and clamping on edges, etc. I 
    readily observe how easily you can crush an edge surface with a panel clamp.
    
    Perhaps unrelated, but none-the-less interesting and perhaps unknown to 
    many, is how much and how easily one can reduce the cross-grain dimension of 
    a thin spruce panel when clamping. I've never measured it, but I would 
    estimate that one could reduce the width of a meter-wide panel by 5 to 10 mm 
    with only finger torquing on a few clamps. Spruce is very spongy that way.
    
    > Yet Ron reports that the panel thus constrained simply didn't take on any 
    > crown. These two strike me as mutually exclusive.
    
    Hmmmm. Doesn't strike me that way. I don't see that one has anything to do 
    with the other. And even if one were to expect some crowning from the rim 
    constraint, if it didn't crown, the crushing of the panel at the edge might 
    be a factor causing the lack of crown.
    
    Again, I agree with Ron - the darn thing won't crown anyway from rim 
    constraint.
    
    > If the edges indeed would simply crush when subjected to such pressure ... 
    > then what would prevent his experiment board from crowning ?
    
    If the edges simply crush from rim constraint, then the rim is not any 
    longer providing any force to the panel to promote crowning (if one were to 
    believe that it could).
    
    > If the edges are strong enough to keep the panel from crowning, then it 
    > would seem to me that they are strong enough to help support crown if they 
    > were first asked to..... which of course is a different question all 
    > together.
    
    Well, actually, that is what I thought you were asking. I agree, that if one 
    believes that rim constraint causes crown, then a panel edge that resisted 
    crushing would indeed be part of a crown-making system.
    
    But I think all of that is hogwash. Either the panel supports crown (at 
    least for a while) in a compression crowned soundboard system, or the ribs 
    support crown in a rib supported system, or some combination of the two. I 
    think I was running at the mouth more than anything with any comment I made 
    about panel edges crushing and whatnot.
    
    Terry Farrell
    
    


  • 14.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 15:04
    From "Jude Reveley/Absolute Piano" <juderev@verizon.net>
    
    A few cents...ladies and gents,
    
    I've heard before that Hamburg pre-crowns ribs, but this was contradicted by 
    Hartwig inside the factory. I would love some confirmation, Ric, and any 
    other juicy tidbits you might be able to extract. I understand they're a lot 
    more open in Hamburg than NY.
    
    As for Steingraber, they seem to be the only company that is really trying 
    to preserve a dome shape to their boards. Not only do they glue a 
    pre-crowned treble bridge to an unribbed board, they also custom fit the rim 
    all the way round, which makes more sense than assuming a 1 degree angle on 
    three sides will yield anything except more stress (not that I'm saying more 
    stress is undesirable). The Germans seem to have done copious research on 
    stress in soundboards as a tone-producing ingredient, according to Sauter. 
    There are many texts in German which have yet to be translated into English.
    
    The Steingraber bass bridge is attached after the board is installed because 
    of the many centemeter variations in the plate casting. The bass bridge is 
    therefore hallowed out at the root to allow it to flex onto the crown of the 
    board.
    
    Regards,
    
    Jude Reveley, RPT
    Absolute Piano Restoration, LLC
    Lowell, Massachusetts
    (978) 323-4545 
    


  • 15.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 15:05
      |   view attached
    From John Delacour <JD@Pianomaker.co.uk>
    
    At 10:45 -0500 19/1/08, Farrell wrote:
    
    >Again, I agree with Ron - the darn thing won't crown anyway from rim 
    >constraint.
    
    Quite so, but let's leave opinion aside and look at the reality of 
    the matter, which seems to be something like this.
    
    Consider a section of soundboard 6" wide with one rib.  Consider them 
    first separately.  Which will it be easier to bend a certain amount? 
    No contest : the 6" strip of board will bend with the slightest 
    effort and the rib with great difficulty.
    
    The picture below is a scale drawing, which you can see (using 
    Firefox or Opera or Safari) as an SVG file which you can enlarge if 
    you wish. Click 
    <http://pianomaker.co.uk/technical/temp/crown.svg>here or on the 
    image to view the file.  How to zoom it will depend on your browser.
    
    
    <http://pianomaker.co.uk/technical/temp/crown.svg>
    I have exaggerated the crown to a radius of 15ft.  The length of the 
    section is 500 mm.
    
    Note that lines of force acting between the two red lines run mainly 
    through the rib, preponderating if anything slightly towards the top 
    of the rib.
    
    When wood takes on moisture it expands, as we all know, but it 
    doesn't expand isotropically -- far from it; the expansion along the 
    grain is practically negligeable in comparison to the expansion 
    across the grain.  I'm not looking at any figures at the moment but I 
    imagine the difference for softwoods is even more marked.
    
    So the assembly takes on moisture... not only does the rib expand as 
    a result by but a negligeable amount but whatever expansion there is 
    will tend if anything to make it bend downwards and reduce the crown.
    
    As you have just pointed out, spruce compresses very easily across 
    the grain has  low elasticity across the grain.  Whatever expansion 
    there is of the soundboard across the grain (left to right in the 
    picture), and there will be significant expansion, will result in 
    compression of the wood within or beyond the yield point, but any 
    power it might have to make any difference to the crown will be 
    completely negated by the action of the rib and the forces to which 
    this is subjected.
    
    Incidentally I have drawn the rib as it would be in a soundboard made 
    in the English fashion, ie. planed to radius before assembly and 
    planed straight on the underside after the assembly has settled down 
    to the normal environment.
    
    JD
    


  • 16.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 15:39
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    You need the latest version of Firefox for this file. Firefox 2
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
        The picture below is a scale drawing, which you can see (using
        Firefox or Opera or Safari) as an SVG file which you can enlarge if
        you wish. Click
        <http://pianomaker.co.uk/technical/temp/crown.svg>here or on the
        image to view the file.  How to zoom it will depend on your browser
    


  • 17.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 15:47
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    For clarification please.  Are you saying that as the panel takes on 
    humidity the ribbed assembly will experience a reduction in crown... and 
    not increase ? 
    
    RicB
    
    
        So the assembly takes on moisture... not only does the rib expand as
        a result by but a negligeable amount but whatever expansion there is
        will tend if anything to make it bend downwards and *_reduce the
        crown_.*
    
        ......and there will be significant expansion, will result in
        compression of the wood within or beyond the yield point, but any
        power it might have to make any difference to the crown will be
        _*completely** **negated by the action of the rib and the forces to
        which
        this is subjected.*_
    


  • 18.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 16:29
    From John Delacour <JD@Pianomaker.co.uk>
    
    At 23:46 +0100 19/1/08, Richard Brekne wrote:
    
    >For clarification please.  Are you saying that as the panel takes on 
    >humidity the ribbed assembly will experience a reduction in crown... 
    >and not increase ?
    
    The forces are quite different according to whether the soundboard is 
    stuck in and clamped down or not, strung or not.  Of course the free 
    assembly will crown up as the board takes on moisture.  That's how 
    this whole topic began -- with St?phane's drama, and that's how the 
    soundboard is given its crown by the English method, as I've 
    explained twice recently on the list, so why would I be saying that?
    
    JD
    


  • 19.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 16:52
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Hmm.. So what are you saying here....  are you saying that a soundboard 
    that is glued into place in the rim then will loose crown as it takes on 
    humidity ? If so... please explain further.
    
    RicB
    
        Richard Brekne wrote:
    
             >For clarification please.  Are you saying that as the panel
            takes on
             >humidity the ribbed assembly will experience a reduction in
            crown...
             >and not increase ?
    
    
        The forces are quite different according to whether the soundboard is
        stuck in and clamped down or not, strung or not.  Of course the free
        assembly will crown up as the board takes on moisture.  That's how
        this whole topic began -- with St?phane's drama, and that's how the
        soundboard is given its crown by the English method, as I've
        explained twice recently on the list, so why would I be saying that?
    
        JD
    


  • 20.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 10:06
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Hi Terry...
    
    I'll just take this bit here as it seems like we are on the same page at 
    this point.... comment below it all
    
    
             > If the edges are strong enough to keep the panel from
            crowning, then it
             > would seem to me that they are strong enough to help support
            crown if they
             > were first asked to..... which of course is a different
            question all
             > together.
    
    
        Well, actually, that is what I thought you were asking. I agree,
        that if one
        believes that rim constraint causes crown, then a panel edge that
        resisted
        crushing would indeed be part of a crown-making system.
    
    My point is... that  Ron's experiment shows clearly the end grain of the 
    top half of the panel will not crush as advertised in some of the 
    argumentation against the buttressed arch idea. Indeed... it is strong 
    enough to <<buttress>> his experimental panel bit against crowning.  So 
    the "end grain will simply crush" argument appears clearly disproved by 
    his experiment.
    
    Whether or not the soundboard actually behaves in such a manner that 
    this same edge wood would actually exert outward pressure on the rim in 
    the face of increase down bearing ... or as Ron suggests do the exact 
    opposite... is another question entirely.  But if it actually DID exert 
    outward pressure... it seems clearly demonstrated by his own experiment 
    that the end grain would not simply crush. It would hold stand as it did 
    in his experiment.
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    


  • 21.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 10:37
    From "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
    
    Boy, I don't really know. I should re-read Ron's article. Do you are anyone 
    else know which issue it appeared in?
    
    Please keep in mind here that I'm not really trying to argue this or that 
    about any of this - I'm happy with the way I build soundboards and I don't 
    worry one way or the other about the rim doing anything but sitting there 
    and hopefully not significantly dampening the vibrations of my soundboard.
    
    Terry Farrell
    
    


  • 22.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 13:37
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    I'll agree 100 % here as well.  I'm in this only because I am curious 
    and what I see in front of me doesn't quite add up all the way.  I dont 
    have Rons article handy at home but I'll look through at work tomorrow 
    and find it.  Deserves a re-read for sure.  For that matter I would 
    recommend it as a read to anyone interested in this subject matter.  As 
    for being happy about the way you do things... why shouldn't you be ?   
    What works works. But it is kinda cool to try and understand how all 
    these different ways of going about building a piano are reasoned out... 
    and how much of that reasoning has something going for it.
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
        Boy, I don't really know. I should re-read Ron's article. Do you are
        anyone
        else know which issue it appeared in?
    
        Please keep in mind here that I'm not really trying to argue this or
        that
        about any of this - I'm happy with the way I build soundboards and I
        don't
        worry one way or the other about the rim doing anything but sitting
        there
        and hopefully not significantly dampening the vibrations of my
        soundboard.
    
        Terry Farrell
    


  • 23.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 13:44
    From "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
    
    > But it is kinda cool to try and understand how all 
    > these different ways of going about building a piano are reasoned out... 
    > and how much of that reasoning has something going for it.
    
    And how much of it for which there is no reason.......
    
    Terry Farrell
    
    


  • 24.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 14:06
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Yes... both bits in equal proportion.
    
    One thing that goes again and again tho... not submiting a piano to 
    extremes of climate conditions. Strikes me that if you hold any board 
    within reasonable operating parameters climate wise it will last a long 
    time and do very well indeed.
    
    But we digress.... I get your drift anyways.  You are willing to go so 
    far as to acknowledge that if the end grain in Rons experiment can be 
    attributed as the reason the panel didn't crown, then it must be strong 
    enough to resist any such pressure.... which immediately means it would 
    be able to hold up in the arch scenario.  But you are not willing to go 
    along with it ever being in the arch scenario to begin with.... yes ?
    
        " I agree,  that if one believes that rim constraint causes crown,
        then a panel edge that resisted crushing would indeed be part of a
        crown-making system."
    
    
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
             > But it is kinda cool to try and understand how all
             > these different ways of going about building a piano are
            reasoned out...
             > and how much of that reasoning has something going for it.
    
    
        And how much of it for which there is no reason.......
    
        Terry Farrell
    


  • 25.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 01-19-2008 15:59
      |   view attached
    From "David Love" <davidlovepianos@comcast.net>
    
    Nice illustration.  I would be curious to see or hear about the jigs people
    use to crown ribs when they are not crowing by bending and laminating.  
    
     
    
    David Love
    davidlovepianos@comcast.net
    www.davidlovepianos.com 
    
    


  • 26.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-19-2008 17:08
    From "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
    
    Re: Soundboard drydown for installationWhat's exaggerated about a crown radius of 15 feet?
    
    Terry Farrell
      


  • 27.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-20-2008 15:21
    From Erwinspiano@aol.com
    
    Hey Jude dude
         I spoke with Udo Steingraeber  Friday night at a private party/ 
    Reception, in Which his new & 7 ft &  7inch piano was showcased by five of the most 
    awesome & prodigious L.A.  First call, A list pianists & Jazz players.  
    BTW...Jude , he  confirmed many things you state below.
       The piano sounded awesome.  T'was  Dark, clear & singing & powerful.  No 
    duplex scaling behind the  bridge & each backscale length was nice & uniform as 
    it rested on a half  round brass bearing bar. 
      I checked the residual treble bearing to be  evenly about 1 1/2 degrees.  
    The rear lengths were ,in my opinion,  adequate for bridge freedom.  
        It's tonal pocket is very similar  to what I'm trying to achieve thru an 
    entirely different form of Sound board  building. In my experience any board 
    dried to 4 % before ribbing would show  compression rumpling a cross the panel 
    after stringing but none was in evidence  on this piano. It had 15 taller than 
    wide ribs & a nice sweeping cutoff bar  & aquite a thin panel as best as I 
    could tlel by peeping thru the nose bolt  holes. Udo confirms using flat ribs in 
    a dish of sorts  &  palced a big emphasis about crown along the bridge.  In 
    fact he  had never heard of checking the crown along the ribs with a String.  I 
    was  honestly baffled by this. Certainly a certain amount of crown is 
    expected across  the ribs but perhaps it was all propreitary which is as it should  
    be.
      
    Whatever.  The on going lessons for me are that,  .....many things work & 
    some of them work really well.  What I do know  is the piano sounded truly 
    awesome  & personally inspiring & also.  It would only let  me play minor key stuff 
    at first & sounded familiar to a certain D I  once rebuilt but .....that's 
    another story.
      David & Tanya put on a elegant &  wonderful party for the Steingraeber crew 
    & friends  & he can  elaborate as he wishes.
      Dale Erwin
     
    As for  Steingraber, they seem to be the only company that is really trying 
    to  preserve a dome shape to their boards. Not only do they glue a 
    pre-crowned  treble bridge to an unribbed board, they also custom fit the rim 
    all the way  round, which makes more sense than assuming a 1 degree angle on 
    three sides  will yield anything except more stress (not that I'm saying more 
    stress is  undesirable). The Germans seem to have done copious research on 
    stress in  soundboards as a tone-producing ingredient, according to Sauter. 
    There are  many texts in German which have yet to be translated into English.
    
    The  Steingraber bass bridge is attached after the board is installed because 
    of  the many centemeter variations in the plate casting. The bass bridge is  
    therefore hallowed out at the root to allow it to flex onto the crown of the  
    board.
    
    Regards,
    
    Jude Reveley, RPT
    Absolute Piano  Restoration, LLC
    Lowell, Massachusetts
    (978) 323-4545  
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    **************Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape.     
    http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
    


  • 28.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-21-2008 08:52
    From "Jude Reveley/Absolute Piano" <juderev@verizon.net>
    
    Hail Dale, (Sorry had to return the rhyme), et al,
    
    I come from the land of a very strict adherence to the doctrine of CC boards. Speak up if I offend any neighbors here on the list, but I think I am the only heretic in this part of the land that has abandoned the CC for a hybrid and even gone as far as experimenting with the RC & S. Currently, I have settled on a hybrid. I think the primary reluctance to abandon the lower ranges of MC (3.5-5%) has to do with the knowledge that most households here range from RH in the low teens in winter to the high 80s in the summer. We just can't count on our customers maintaining the RH in their piano room, hell we're lucky enough if we can get them to move their $80,000 investment away from the fireplace, heating register, window and exterior wall (like my piano for example, not the price just the situation). We know our wood can withstand the compression set of the expanding board better than the contracting board so we ere on that side and deal with the compression ridges. Udo Steingraber also mentioned that their drying schedule had more to do with protecting the wood from the driest environs than promoting crown. Some speak of the ethereal qualities and tonal color that only a CC board can yield but I'll leave that one alone :).
    
    Using my handy-dandy "Crownulator," [see archives] the other thing I've noticed is that my traditional CC brethren, that rely on low MC and forced crowning (i.e. in a dish) to promote crown, end up with way more crown than they thought. Their go-bar decks may measure 60' radius, but by the time the board is glued in, they usually have about a 35' to 40' radius which is more than what I've seen in some rebuilders' boards that are pre-crowning their ribs, unless of course they are using a more ambitious radius in their rib scale from the get go, as I am. This is all measured in the unloaded state across the grain. Loaded states are even more interesting, but I would like to collect more data before making any statements.
    
    The back bass corner seems to flatten out on all boards due to the fact that we are all unlimited by the inner rim unless we are manufacturing our own pianos. This is what really interested me about the Steingraber's inner rim profile. They also custom taper their boards by placing sand on each board and tapping the board in the middle until all the sand moves towards the edges of the perimeter of the board.
    
    I'm not sure how much sense the crowned bridge makes to me or any crown along the grain. I'm more concerned with the apex of crown being centered under the load across the grain, and in this regard the Steingraber has a very symmetrical design. Observe that straight treble bridge (no hockey stick), placement of impedance devices in the low bass and treble and the bass cut-off if you get a chance.
    
    The other point I wish to make is that we have to remember that we're not dealing with one board glued at each end, but rather several planks glued together and then mounted all the way round. Ron's experiment is a good one but it would be good to try to repeat the concept of the experiment using a model that comes closer to a piano soundboard. We should note that the individual planks within the soundboard have a mind of their own depending on the grain and how the panels are glued together in regards to radial and tangential shrinkage.    
    
    It is all very interesting, and paraphrasing Udo, how can we expect one piano to satisfy the whole repertoire from Scarlatti to Thelonious Monk and beyond. Still, I won't be happy until I can say that this species of wood with such and such modulus of elasticity, given x amount of load, with y rib scale and design, and so and so's hammers yield this type of sound. Yeah, dream on...
    
    Back to work,
     
    Jude Reveley, RPT
    Absolute Piano Restoration, LLC
    Lowell, Massachusetts
    (978) 323-4545
      


  • 29.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 06:43
    From Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net>
    
    > I'm not sure how much sense the crowned bridge makes to me or any crown 
    > along the grain. 
    
    Consider that on a rim that's essentially a plane, it's not 
    geometrically possible in any board that has crown along the 
    ribs, to *not* have crown along the grain. It's a result, not 
    a feature.
    
    
    > The other point I wish to make is that we have to remember that 
    > we're not dealing with one board glued at each end, but rather several 
    > planks glued together and then mounted all the way round. Ron's 
    > experiment is a good one but it would be good to try to repeat the 
    > concept of the experiment using a model that comes closer to a piano 
    > soundboard. 
    
    The only purpose of that model was to illustrate that 
    soundboard crown isn't an end buttressed arch, which I think 
    it did well enough. What else would you expect or wish a 
    larger and more complex model to show?
    
    
    > It is all very interesting, and paraphrasing Udo, how can we expect one 
    > piano to satisfy the whole repertoire from Scarlatti to Thelonious Monk 
    > and beyond. Still, I won't be happy until I can say that this species of 
    > wood with such and such modulus of elasticity, given x amount of load, 
    > with y rib scale and design, and so and so's hammers yield this type of 
    > sound. Yeah, dream on...
    
    When you finally do, you'll find that there will be people who 
    don't like the sound because that ain't how it's done and what 
    they're used to, and others for whom no "theoretical" hair can 
    be split fine enough to satisfy them, whatever you actually 
    produce.
    Ron N
    


  • 30.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 10:10
    From "Jude Reveley/Absolute Piano" <juderev@verizon.net>
    
    


  • 31.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 13:37
    From Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net>
    
    > *Agreed. So maybe Udo Steingraber is on to something by custom shaping 
    > the inner rim to the profile of the board right before installation, and 
    > Dale seems to agree, that it reduces the stress that is placed upon the 
    > panel during glue-in. What does that do to the sound? No way am I taking 
    > the bait on that one. Sure is worth further experimentation, though, and 
    > I have to admit I get a bit nervous when I'm forcing my potato chip 
    > shaped panels to conform to the inner rim.*
    
    I've done it both ways. I've "crowned" three bridges, and 
    found no benefit to it that I can hear, so I don't go th the 
    trouble any more. Maybe a Philistine assessment, but that's 
    what I have to work with. Mashing the potato chip to fit the 
    rim doesn't bother me in the least. I stressed the wood in the 
    ribs much more than that laminating in the crown.
    
    Oh, and a practical question about your being in the CC 
    capital of the universe. When the RH% gets into the low teens, 
    say 15%, the MC of the soundboards will be 3.5%, at or before 
    which point a CC board will be flat or have reverse crowned. 
    Do you have a recognized annual killer octave season or 
    festival there?
    Ron N
    


  • 32.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 19:37
    From "Jude Reveley/Absolute Piano" <juderev@verizon.net>
    
    > Oh, and a practical question about your being in the CC 
    > capital of the universe. When the RH% gets into the low teens, 
    > say 15%, the MC of the soundboards will be 3.5%, at or before 
    > which point a CC board will be flat or have reverse crowned. 
    > Do you have a recognized annual killer octave season or 
    > festival there?
    > Ron N
    > 
    
    Hmmm, well I like festivals, Maestro, but will there be floats...
    
     3.5 to 4% is the emc of choice for my CC friends. I've measured a few of these boards so far and surprisingly they have plenty of crown, probably coming from a combination of the forced crowning from the gobar deck and from the inner rim.
    
    Whereas I'm at 5%, rib supported. I have a wood conditioning room that senses RH and opens a relay that I can designate for humidification or dehumidification depending on the season, but in all honesty I let her ride down to 4% this time of year rather than put my board in a "wet box."
    
    I also machine a tongue and groove joint in my planks. Del Fandrich referred me to the government's Wood Handbook, which I read in parts. The text states that while this joint is stronger in theory because of the additional glue surface, the effect is often negated by poor machining. I make sure I'm getting a great joint on all five sides and these panels feel stiffer than side grain edge glued panels. Also the tongue and groove allows me to align the planks in such a way that you end up with a thicker panel overall, which I don't think can be refuted.
    
    Jude Reveley, RPT
    Absolute Piano Restoration, LLC
    Lowell, Massachusetts
    (978) 323-4545


  • 33.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 14:29
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    This is a point that has had me scratching my head for a long time.  
    Strikes me that a board that is dried to 4 % MC before ribbing will 
    simply return to this state at any time in the pianos life the MC gets 
    back to that level.  It will simply flatten out... and their will be no 
    compression stress in the assembly.  If string downbearing is 
    appropriately set to begin with.. there will be no downbearing either.  
    Whats the problem ?
    
    If on the other hand a board is simply dried to 6.5 % MC... then 
    ribbed.... regardless of what kind of ribs one uses, if it reaches 4 % 
    MC at some point in the future then THIS is the board that should worry 
    about reverse crown... splitting apart... or worse.  What am I missing 
    here ?
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
        Oh, and a practical question about your being in the CC
        capital of the universe. When the RH% gets into the low teens,
        say 15%, the MC of the soundboards will be 3.5%, at or before
        which point a CC board will be flat or have reverse crowned.
        Do you have a recognized annual killer octave season or
        festival there?
    


  • 34.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-20-2008 16:19
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Hi St?phane
    
    Well... just got done re-reading Rons article and as I understand it 
    turns out that Terry's answer really is wrong on two counts and perhaps 
    (probably right) on the third.  As to the conclusion as to whether its a 
    good idea to dry the ribbed assembly down before gluing into the rim... 
    lets just say whatever reason there is for that doesn't seem to have 
    much to do with creating or supporting crown.... tho I still have a bit 
    of reserve head scratching to do on that matter.
    
    Ron does two things in his experiment.  The first more or less proves 
    the end grain is substantially more tough then this idea that it will 
    just crush under pressure idea that has been thrown around. He 
    constructs a small single ribbed panel, dries it down and wedges it into 
    small base and buttress jig made from old pinblock material. The sides 
    of this panel would not be able to move outwards period.  Upon taking on 
    humidity the thing even after a few weeks took on no crown.  The reason 
    given has to do with the geometry of buttressed arches... and if 
    correctly assessed (and I see no reason to doubt his assessment) a 
    direct consequence is that the edge wood of the top half of this little 
    panel did not crush despite the pressure it was under. The only thing I 
    can see possibly going wrong in this part of his experiment is that it 
    appears in the foto that the underside of the ribs were flush with the 
    base of the jig... which may have influenced the lack of appearance of 
    crown... but I kinda doubt it.  Still... I suppose I'd like to repeat 
    his experiment without that "constraint".   In any case all this  kinda 
    shoots the sh#t out of the crushed edge argument.
    
    The next part of Rons experiment was simply to demonstrate that there is 
    no outwards pressure on the rim... or in the case of his experiment his 
    base and buttress jig when a ribbed and crowned panel was placed into 
    it.. and wedged tightly as before.  What happens when downbearing is 
    applied.... is that the edges actually pull away from the <<rim>>. 
    
    So Terrys comment below was wrong on both the first two counts. The top 
    edge wont crush to begin with, and the top edge doesn't expand outwards 
    to begin with.  At least not in the face of an increase in down 
    bearing... and all of this is well justified by the same geometry 
    relating to buttressed arches as above.
    
    Anyone re-reading the article will be able to see this readily.
    
    As for the rim in a real piano being resistive enough... well... Rons 
    experiment doesnt really get into that.  And in my mind there are a 
    couple questions left open about what happens to an already crowned 
    panel that actually does expand outwards against a resistive ridge...  
    Perhaps it will behave exactly the same as the flat panel in his 
    experiment... I just haven't thought it through enough yet.
    
    In anycase... whatever reasons there are for drying out the panel... and 
    fitting it tightly to the rim before letting it take on humidity do not 
    seem to me to have much to do with the crowning issue. 
    
    Then there was JD's post which I am still in my mind trying to fit into 
    this picture.  I'm not sure what he was saying there... but it seemed 
    like he was stating that a rib crowned panel glued into place would if 
    anything move in the direction of reverse crown upon taking on humidity. 
    Much of the middle part of the rib was above his two <<force lines>>... 
    and a panel taking on humidity along with that part of the rib would all 
    want to expand... Putting the rest of the rib under some tension.... How 
    that could result in a kind of reverse crown strain I dont see at this 
    point...and perhaps thats not what he was saying at all.  But if so.. 
    then how that in turn would affect whether the edge grain of the panel 
    would be exerting outwards pressure on the rim or pulling away as in 
    Rons demonstration... well all this has my head aching again :)
    
    Actually... I love it.... wish I knew more and wish this medium of ours 
    allowed for better communications among folks who clearly share an awful 
    lot of the same kinds of interests but dont seem to manage to get across 
    to each other.
    
    To end... I'd say the most obvious relavant thing I've seen in these 
    posts that have tried to address your question is that a tighter fit 
    probably results in less movement.. or wiggle someone said in the 
    position of the soundboard... and hence bridges with changes in 
    humidity.. which gets into all kinds of other stuff... your glue 
    questions for one...
    
    Hope this all serves to yield a nice evenings sleep :)
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
    
            Hi Terry (and Mike, and Ric).
    
            If I get you all right, there is no need for drying the ribbed
            panel again
            before gluing it in the piano.
    
            But then, if I understand well, there would be no problem either
            gluing the
            ribbed board in the piano in a 60 % humidity environment, and
            let the piano
            undergo severe winters at 28 % either.  Is this what you think ?
            If so, I have to admit I must update my own thoughts (which
            happens often
            these last days), for example about soundboard cracks causes.
            So all the climate matters are between the ribs and the board
            (and the
            method of assembling), right ?
    
            By the way, my miserable board did come back to normal shape
            (after 48
            hours) and is glorious again.  I see no reason anymore to commit
            suicide
            today.
    
            Best regards.
    
            St?phane Collin.
    
    
        'Course, none of this actually works - the ribs won't shrink much,
        the panel
        top edge will just crush when it expands the 1/10 mm that it might
        move and
        the rim has enough flex to negate any "arch" support.
    
        Terry Farrell
    


  • 35.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-21-2008 02:49
    From John Delacour <JD@Pianomaker.co.uk>
    
    At 00:18 +0100 21/1/08, Richard Brekne wrote:
    
    >...Then there was JD's post which I am still in my mind trying to 
    >fit into this picture.  I'm not sure what he was saying there... but 
    >it seemed like he was stating that a rib crowned panel glued into 
    >place would if anything move in the direction of reverse crown upon 
    >taking on humidity. Much of the middle part of the rib was above his 
    >two <<force lines>>
    
    I certainly did not intend to suggest that in any circumstances the 
    crown would diminish with increase in moisture content, though, 
    re-reading my post I must admit it's not unambiguous -- put it down 
    to the late hour and my concentration on the SVG drawing.
    
    If two pieces of wood are glued together and one side of the sandwich 
    is allowed to take on moisture, the sandwich will become convex on 
    the damp side, no matter what the nature and grain direction of the 
    woods are.  In the case of a soundboard, even if both the rib and the 
    board take on equal degrees of moisture, convexity will develop on 
    the soundboard side owing to the fact that this expands across the 
    grain and the rib expands only a tiny amount in its length.  A visual 
    representation of this would be to press the spine of a comb against 
    the side of a saucepan, imagining that the bending force is created 
    at the end of the teeth.
    
    When the complete assembly is glued to the inner rim and clamped down 
    by the metal frame, even if the rim is angled to follow the ultimate 
    curve of the board, as is usual, the resistive force at the edges of 
    the board that develops as the board takes on moisture will to some 
    extent resist the development of the crown and lead to some degree of 
    compression of the summer growth of the spruce.  When the pressure of 
    the strings is applied to the crowned board the compression of the 
    summer growth is considerably increased as the crown is forced down...
    
    ...but all this is pretty obvious and not terribly inforrmative and I 
    must get out to the farm and make some strings.
    
    JD
    


  • 36.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-22-2008 08:43
    From Erwinspiano@aol.com
    
    Hey Jude
    
    Hail Dale, (Sorry had to return the rhyme), et  al,
     
    I come from the land of a very strict adherence to the  doctrine of CC 
    boards. Speak up if I offend any neighbors here on the  list, but I think I am the 
    only heretic in this part of the land that has  abandoned the CC for a hybrid 
    and even gone as far as experimenting with the  RC & S. 
    
      You heritic
    
    Currently, I have settled on a hybrid. I think the  primary reluctance to 
    abandon the lower ranges of MC (3.5-5%) has to do with  the knowledge that most 
    households here range from RH in the low teens in  winter to the high 80s in 
    the summer. We just can't count on our customers  maintaining the RH in their 
    piano room, hell we're lucky enough if we can get  them to move their $80,000 
    investment away from the fireplace, heating  register, window and exterior wall 
    (like my piano for example, not the price  just the situation).
    
        With the Sitka that you are using your  boards stand a way better chance 
    of surviving than the Much softer varieties of  spruce such as the white 
    boards that Or Eastern spruce.  At 5% emc when  ribbing and crowning ribs you have 
    a great sounding piano with less opportunity  for damage.
     
     
    
    We know our wood can withstand the compression set of the  expanding board 
    better than the contracting board so we ere on that side and  deal with the 
    compression ridges. Udo Steingraber also mentioned that their  drying schedule had 
    more to do with protecting the wood from the driest  environs than promoting 
    crown. Some speak of the ethereal qualities and tonal  color that only a CC 
    board can yield but I'll leave that one alone  :).
    
      I've heard many incredible sounding C.C. soundboards of  many ages. The 
    point of course as stated many times is we strive for greater  Reliability and 
    predictability.  This is the reason we are  trying new techniques. 
        The C.C. panel is a very strong structure  when built this way & that 
    stiffness is IMO vital component to producing an  even sounding scale. If too 
    much compression is left out of a C. C design but  the old ribbing pattern is 
    retained the possibility for board resonates are  greater. I.e.Such as a weak not 
    on a c sharp 52 & the next note is  strong.  We all hear these anomallies in 
    most pianos.  Our goal  as board builders & designers is to eliminate them 
    with our methods &  materials.
    
     
    Using my handy-dandy "Crownulator," [see archives] the other  thing I've 
    noticed is that my traditional CC brethren, that rely on low MC and  forced 
    crowning (i.e. in a dish) to promote crown, end up with way more crown  than they 
    thought. Their go-bar decks may measure 60' radius, but by the time  the board 
    is glued in, they usually have about a 35' to 40' radius which  is more than 
    what I've seen in some rebuilders' boards that are pre-crowning  their ribs, 
    unless of course they are using a more ambitious radius in their  rib scale from 
    the get go, as I am. This is all measured in  the unloaded state across the 
    grain. Loaded states are even more  interesting, but I would like to collect 
    more data before making any  statements.
    
      Yes more initially but even my own practice I can see a huge  belly before 
    it goes in but as the board conforms to the rim some of that extra  crown 
    disappears. I think the numbers of radii you state are fine.  I've  introduced 
    some pretty steep crown with my methods/press/ribs with no  adverse results.  How 
    much is too much.  I dunno
    
        
     
     Still, I won't be happy until I can say that  this species of wood with such 
    and such modulus of elasticity, given x  amount of load, with y rib scale and 
    design, and so and so's hammers yield  this type of sound. Yeah, dream on...
    
      Yeah...Well said Jude.  I have other  thoughts about the crowned bridge 
    stuff.  Maybe there issomething to it  that we just can't quantify.  Yes I know 
    the idea has been thoroughly shot  down on list & we can agree to disagree but 
    I can think of one board I  did that had a real sparkle to it when I did this. 
     Not only that but the  board set right into the piano & the trebles & bass 
    corners didn't  require the requiste stress to get them down on the rim. Yes 
    there is a slight  bending stress that is introduced along the grain but is that 
    a bad  thing.....  Is it a positive  thing?  Perhaps
        its' like the little Mason  & Hamlin Crown demonstrator jig where the 
    thin piece of spruce is bent along  the grain & then the sound suddenly come to 
    life.  Aye?
      Many folks do it this way who have decades  of practice.  My Motis operandi 
    has always been try stuff &  listen.  Then I get to decide for 
    myself......Ain't it  great?
      Dale
    
     
    Back to work,
     
     
    
    
     
    
    
    
    **************Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape.     
    http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
    


  • 37.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-22-2008 10:24
    From "AlliedPianoCraft" <AlliedPianoCraft@hotmail.com>
    
    I come from the land of a very strict adherence to the doctrine of CC boards. Speak up if I offend any neighbors here on the list, but I think I am the only heretic in this part of the land that has abandoned the CC for a hybrid and even gone as far as experimenting with the RC & S. 
    
    Please:
    
    CC =
    
    RC&S =
    
    Thanks,
    
    Al Guecia
    Allied PianoCraft
    PO Box 1549
    High Point, NC 27261
    (336) 454-2000
    PianoTech@alliedpianocraft.com
    www.alliedpianocraft.com


  • 38.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-22-2008 11:12
    From "Jude Reveley/Absolute Piano" <juderev@verizon.net>
    
    FYI Al
      Please:
    
      CC = Compression Crowned
    
      RC&S = Rib crowned & supported
    
      Thanks,
    
      Al Guecia
      Allied PianoCraft
      PO Box 1549
      High Point, NC 27261
      (336) 454-2000
      PianoTech@alliedpianocraftcom
      www.alliedpianocraft.com


  • 39.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-22-2008 13:57
    From John Delacour <JD@Pianomaker.co.uk>
    
    At 10:43 -0500 22/1/08, Erwinspiano@aol.com wrote:
    
    >even my own practice I can see a huge belly before it goes in but as 
    >the board conforms to the rim some of that extra crown disappears.
    
    So do you angle the rim to conform to the crown that you're going to 
    end up with when the piano is strung or steeper?
    
    >  I think the numbers of radii you state are fine.  I've introduced 
    >some pretty steep crown with my methods/press/ribs?with no adverse 
    >results.  How much is too much.  I dunno
    
    To my way of thinking crown _in_itself_ is of no value, and I know of 
    many excellent-sounding pianos that have virtually no measurable 
    crown in the finished state.  Take off the strings and up comes the 
    crown.  The importance of crowning is the resulting springiness of 
    the board which is due to the compression of the summer growth 
    initially by the process of drying the board and then letting it try 
    to bend the ribs, and subsequently by pushing it down with the force 
    of the strings, thus compressing the fibres, most at the top surface 
    of the board.  Further compression results when the board takes up 
    more moisture than ideally it would be allowed to, and the result of 
    this, if the compression of the board is already near the limit, will 
    be failure of the least resilient line(s) of summer growth and 
    so-called "compression marks".  Although there is some truth, in my 
    experience, in the statement that compression marks are the sign of a 
    good piano, since I have seen them only in good pianos, there is 
    nothing intrinsically good about a compression mark, since it means 
    usually that too much compression was created in the earlier 
    processes.  All the compression mark does is slightly reduce the 
    compression and render the board unsightly. For makers to claim that 
    a compression mark is a good thing and a sign that they've done their 
    work properly is, to me, nonsense.  It's like a waitress claiming she 
    pours a good cup of tea because some of it always ends up in the 
    saucer.
    
    As to bridges with concave bottoms and all that,  I ask what on earth 
    for?  If the board is compressed as much as possible in order to 
    release pressure when too dry without cracking and build pressure 
    when too wet without giving way in compression failure, then it is 
    going to work well.  Getting that balance right seems to be the 
    perennial problem.  At least when a compression mark forms you can be 
    pretty sure they were near the mark even if they overshot it.
    
    And I'd like to know what is supposed to be achieved by forcing the 
    board to curve along the grain, which has the effect, surely, simply 
    of producing a curve for its own sake.  Sure there's nothing new 
    about the idea but two makers at least that I know who did this 
    stopped doing it in about 1885, presumably for good reason.
    
    JD
    


  • 40.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-22-2008 14:57
    From "Porritt, David" <dporritt@mail.smu.edu>
    
    On January 22, 2008 JD wrote:
    
    ---- big snip ---
    
    All the compression mark does is slightly reduce the 
    compression and render the board unsightly. For makers to claim that 
    a compression mark is a good thing and a sign that they've done their 
    work properly is, to me, nonsense.  It's like a waitress claiming she 
    pours a good cup of tea because some of it always ends up in the 
    saucer.
    
    --- big snip ---
    
    John:
    
    When a sounding board has a compression ridge that is a spot where the
    integrity of the board - as a single piece - has been compromised.  That
    is also the place that will open up as a crack when low humidity
    arrives.  However, a direct quote from the new Steinway World-Wide
    Technical Reference Guide:
    
    "A Note about Soundboards:
    
    "An important feature found in the Steinway is the design and
    installation of the soundboard. This
    system is manufactured in such a way that it is constantly under
    compression, which prevents the
    soundboard from relaxing. It is for this reason that compression ridges
    may occur. Compression
    ridges are a cosmetic indication that the soundboard has simply absorbed
    moisture from the
    atmosphere.
    
    "Compression ridges are in no way considered by Steinway to be a concern
    as to the piano's
    performance or a defect in the craftsmanship of the instrument. In fact,
    the presence of such ridging
    is a result of a well-seasoned and properly designed and installed board
    as it adapts to certain
    environments and climate conditions. By design the Steinway soundboard
    is under compression
    and tightly fit to the rim of the piano. This system of compression is a
    key component in producing
    the richness and beauty of the Steinway tone. As a result, compression
    ridging can occur as the
    piano becomes acclimated to or changes with its environment and the
    soundboard absorbs moisture.
    This ridging does not mean that the board is cracked. The opposite is
    true. The board is under
    tension and functioning as it should. Also, if there is no separation
    between the board and the ribs
    under the board this is an indication that both board and ribs are
    functioning as a homogeneous unit
    producing the unique tone of the Steinway piano. This ridging is not
    something new to Steinway.
    It has been documented and addressed in Steinway documentation since the
    late 1800s."
    
    So, since compression ridges are so wonderful, should I be disappointed
    in the 26 Steinways that we have that lack this feature?
    
    dave
    
    ____________________
    David M. Porritt, RPT
    dporritt@smu.edu
     
    


  • 41.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-22-2008 15:48
    From John Delacour <JD@Pianomaker.co.uk>
    
    At 15:56 -0600 22/1/08, Porritt, David wrote:
    
    >...When a sounding board has a compression ridge that is a spot where the
    >integrity of the board - as a single piece - has been compromised.
    
    Sure
    
    >   That is also the place that will open up as a crack when low humidity
    >arrives.
    
    That's rather less sure in my experience, though I have colleagues 
    who claim  have seen compression marks develop into open cracks.  In 
    certain makes I expect to find open cracks and a smooth board, in 
    others compression marks with no opening up.  I suppose that given 
    sufficient aridity the board will lose all internal compression and 
    have no more strength to push the slipped rings of the compression 
    ridge together, at which point the board will actually crack at this, 
    the weakest, point.  Usually, I find, there is enough compression in 
    the board each side of the ridge to push it together, but then our 
    climate is not that of much of America.
    
    >   However, a direct quote from the new Steinway World-Wide
    >Technical Reference Guide:
    >
    >"...This ridging does not mean that the board is cracked. The opposite is
    >true. The board is under tension and functioning as it should..."
    
    And I say, Mr. Steinway Salesman-Apologist, that you should learn 
    that tension is precisely the opposite of compression :-)
    
    JD
    


  • 42.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 10:22
    From "Jude Reveley/Absolute Piano" <juderev@verizon.net>
    
    


  • 43.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-22-2008 22:11
    From Erwinspiano@aol.com
    
    Hi JD
      Well, I would like to know for sure as too but  whatever it does it doesn't 
    seem to be a detriment either way.   
       The only thing I can imagine is that as I said in  my earlier posting that 
    a bridge which is glued to the board with a light  curvature reduces the need 
    to force down the treble & bass ends to the  rim as much.
       & Always , Always when the first clamps to go  on during glue up to the 
    rim are on  the treble and bass corners. One  has to force them down 
    considerably. It may be that when that occurs the middle  of the board is being forced 
    down too. Is that bad.  I dunno.  But on  One A-2 I did in the above fashion 
    seemed to have a considerable  freedom to the sound. It was different.  That's my 
    subjective  opinion. WHen I dropped the board it in the piano the first time 
    it fit all  the way round with little bass treble strain.
         I have had the luxury &  priveledge of hearing approx. 99% percent of 
    the 100 or so boards I've  installed so when something changes I pay attention. 
    My mind id  open
      Dale
    
    And I'd like to know what is supposed to be achieved by forcing  the 
    board to curve along the grain, which has the effect, surely,  simply 
    of producing a curve for its own sake.  Sure there's nothing  new 
    about the idea but two makers at least that I know who did this  
    stopped doing it in about 1885, presumably for good  reason.
    
    JD
    
    
     
    
    
    
    **************Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape.     
    http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
    


  • 44.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 06:30
    From Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net>
    
    > */     I have had the luxury & priveledge of hearing approx. 99% percent 
    > of the 100 or so boards I've installed so when something changes I pay 
    > attention. My mind id open/*
    > */  Dale/*
    
    And crowning the bridge on that one piano was all you did 
    differently from those other 99 boards, right?
    Ron N
    


  • 45.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 13:15
    From John Delacour <JD@Pianomaker.co.uk>
    
    At 00:10 -0500 23/1/08, Erwinspiano@aol.com wrote:
    
    >    Hi JD
    >   Well, I would like to know for sure as?too but whatever it does it 
    >doesn't seem to be a detriment either way.
    >    The only thing I can imagine is that as I said in my earlier 
    >posting that?a bridge which is glued to the board with a light 
    >curvature reduces the need to force?down the treble & bass ends to 
    >the rim?as much...
    
    One way, I was once told, of creating crown along the grain is to 
    plane the edges of the boards with very slight convexity.  Now I have 
    never done this and don't intend trying, and I'm not at all sure the 
    man who told me of it, an ex-Steinway man who's worked independently 
    for over 40 years, had actually tried it himself, but it would 
    certainly work.  The joining of the boards would need to be done on a 
    dished table.
    
    JD
    


  • 46.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 07:01
    From Erwinspiano@aol.com
    
    In a message dated 1/23/2008 5:25:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
    rnossaman@cox.net writes:
    
    And  crowning the bridge on that one piano was all you did 
    differently from  those other 99 boards, right?
    Ron N
    
    
    One that one Yes.  It was a while back. 
     Dale
    
    
    
    **************Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape.     
    http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489
    


  • 47.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 14:08
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    I tend to agree Jude.  That said... seems pretty clear to me that Rons 
    experiment shows rather conclusively at least three things.  One, that 
    the immediate reaction of the soundboard to downbearing is for the edges 
    to pull away from the rim. Two, that the soundboard taking on humidity 
    will attempt to grow outwards above the center line of the assembly... 
    and a tight fitting rim will resist the thing crowning .... not aid.  
    Three that the edge wood of an assembly is considerably stronger then 
    has been loosely suggested many a time on this list.
    
    I still think the whole thing functions more like a cable supported arch 
    then anything else.  The ribs do indeed experience tension as the panel 
    takes on humidity. Both from bending and no doubt some small amount of 
    absolute tension.  That is to say the entire rib will be more lean more 
    towards the tension side of the balance between tension and compression 
    then a similar rib that is simply bent would.  The more you compress the 
    board either by increasing downbearing or by letting the assembly take 
    on humidity... the more tense the <<cable>> becomes. That will continue 
    until such point as the panel itself experiences compression failure.
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
    
             > The only purpose of that model was to illustrate that
             > soundboard crown isn't an end buttressed arch, which I think
             > it did well enough. What else would you expect or wish a
             > larger and more complex model to show?
    
    
        I guess I'm not thinking about a different model but rather a
        different experiment. I'll get back to you when I finally pose a
        real question. :)
    
        Jude Reveley, RPT
        Absolute Piano Restoration, LLC
        Lowell, Massachusetts
        (978) 323-4545
    


  • 48.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 17:05
    From jimialeggio5@comcast.net
    
    >Oh, and a practical question about your being in the CC 
    >capital of the universe. When the RH% gets into the low teens, 
    >say 15%, the MC of the soundboards will be 3.5%, at or before 
    >which point a CC board will be flat or have reverse crowned. 
    >Do you have a recognized annual killer octave season or 
    >festival there?
    >Ron N
    
    Ron...
    
    I'm one of the RC&S folks...Just so I understand this, with the RC&S board in the 3.5% example, what would happen shrinkage wise. 
    
    The length of the ribs is not changing, so the ribs are at design dimension, and supporting the 8mm or so board at design values. 
    
    The board wants to shrink (assuming 6 or 6.5 mc at rib glue-up), but is restrained by the ribs except for some (probably negligible)glue creep. 
    
    In this restrained condition, what happens to the board itself in terms of dimensional shrinkage, not in terms of crown/down-bearing/etc, but simply in terms of when will the board want to crack.  
    
    Jim I
    


  • 49.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-23-2008 17:46
    From Ron Nossaman <rnossaman@cox.net>
    
    > In this restrained condition, what happens to the board
    > itself in terms of dimensional shrinkage, not in terms of
    > crown/down-bearing/etc, but simply in terms of when will
    > the board want to crack.
    > 
    > Jim I
    
    Good question. I don't know. Neither does Jude, which is why 
    he's gone down the middle with the hybrid. I'd expect the 
    board would crack at some point, but it will sooner or later 
    in any construction given that kind of MC variation. 
    Functionally, the difference is that a panel in an RC&S board 
    can crush and crack until it looks like a corn crib and still 
    function quite well, where a CC board would be toast, and an 
    RC hybrid would be degraded to whatever degree it relied on 
    panel compression for stiffness.
    
    This is where RC&S with a laminated panel is the obvious out.
    
    Ron N
    


  • 50.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-24-2008 03:12
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    I should think they would have plenty of crown.
    
    This whole controversy between different board types is so overblown and 
    so much taken out of context its really quite amusing at times.  A CC 
    board which is kept in a reasonably appropriate climate for the amount 
    of MC at rib time will last just as <<forever>> as any other type of 
    board.  The killer octave area not withstanding.... which is in itself 
    is really a different subject matter.  An RC board will also survive and 
    perform quite well given a decent climate as will an RC & S board.  None 
    are inherently superior in any general sense of the word then others.  
    Most of the rhetoric just boils down to personal prejudice (in the 
    neutral sense of the word).  The few basic bald facts that are laced in 
    between all this are not always so easy to discern.. but slowly and 
    surely one is able to. 
    
    Id say that in Judes Climate CC or RC boards would be preferred.  And RC 
    & S board would probably crack up in some short years... and tho it may 
    be claimed that this does not affect the basic performance... a panel 
    with  several gapping cracks looks pretty bad and will simply not be 
    able to defend itself in the face of all the misunderstandings out there. 
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
        Hmmm, well I like festivals, Maestro, but will there be floats...
    
         3.5 to 4% is the emc of choice for my CC friends. I've measured a
        few of these boards so far and surprisingly they have plenty of
        crown, probably coming from a combination of the forced crowning
        from the gobar deck and from the inner rim.
    
        Whereas I'm at 5%, rib supported. I have a wood conditioning room
        that senses RH and opens a relay that I can designate for
        humidification or dehumidification depending on the season, but in
        all honesty I let her ride down to 4% this time of year rather than
        put my board in a "wet box."
    
        I also machine a tongue and groove joint in my planks. Del Fandrich
        referred me to the government's Wood Handbook, which I read in
        parts. The text states that while this joint is stronger in theory
        because of the additional glue surface, the effect is often negated
        by poor machining. I make sure I'm getting a great joint on all five
        sides and these panels feel stiffer than side grain edge glued
        panels. Also the tongue and groove allows me to align the planks in
        such a way that you end up with a thicker panel overall, which I
        don't think can be refuted.
    
        Jude Reveley, RPT
        Absolute Piano Restoration, LLC
        Lowell, Massachusetts
        (978) 323-4545
    


  • 51.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-24-2008 20:16
    From <pianoguru@cox.net>
    
    ---- Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no> wrote: 
    > I still think the whole thing functions more like a cable supported arch 
    > then anything else.  
    
    This brings to mind disagreements that I have had with other piano engineers.  Given a rib with a cut radius of 60’, e. g., they would argue that a 60’ radius of an arc segment at one position on a full circle is not the same, when shifted to another position on that circle.  I would argue that a 60’ radius is still a 60’ radius no matter where it is positioned on that circle.  I came to realize that what they were really trying to say is that the thickest part of the rib must always be directly under the long bridge.  I have two problems with this:
    
    First, with multiple ribs on a soundboard, each with a predetermined radius, and its high point under the long bridge, as the above would argue, the points of intersection of the end points of each rib with the rim would be quite irregular and if taken “literally” would exaggerate the potato chip effect, think Ruffles (Ruffles has ridges).  If not taken so literally, and the inner rim is surfaced to a more reasonable shape for supporting the crown, what would have otherwise been ripples still constituted unnecessary irregular internal stresses in the soundboard assembly.  
    
    Secondly, given your “cable supported arch” analogy, you would normally think of a cable supporting the arch as a cable extended from an end point of the arch to the other end point of the arch, which would place the high point or the arch at its center.  To shift the high point, (or thickest part of the rib, to a position under the long bridge), would be analogous to moving the cable support of the arch from one end point to something short of that, to shift the high point off-center of the arch.  Would not an arch be better supported by a cable between its end points, than from one end point, and something short of the other end point, regardless of where along the arch a force is applied, which would collapse the arch if it were unsupported?  Would this analogy hold true for rib?  Or, does any of this really even matter?
    
    Frank Emerson
    


  • 52.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-25-2008 13:54
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Hi Frank.
    
    I want to read this a bit more closely before offering any thought to 
    the points and questions you raise.  I just wanted to qualify a bit what 
    I mean with the sentence you quote below. To begin with, I don't see any 
    real analogy that perfectly fits. But one thing seemed clear to me 
    nearly immediately after hearing arguements for and against compression 
    reliant soundboards.  The panels compression alone is simply not what 
    does the job of crowning.  Not even in a purely CC board.  The rib 
    tenses... if it didn't it wouldn't bend. Its kind of like a cable that 
    is attached the whole underside of the panel and each mm of cable length 
    is in contact with the panel. But the bit I find significant from the 
    analogy perspective is that as downbearing is applied, the <<cable>> 
    strains against the panel straightening out.  The more you exert down 
    bearing the more the panel compresses and strains the rib... perhaps 
    (probably to some small degree) to the point of exerting some absolute 
    tensioning i.e. lowering centroid line very slightly.
    
    As relates to your point about the high point of the <<arch>> / thickest 
    part of the rib... I agree... the end to end cable analogy doesn't work 
    there.  But the way the ribs strain against the compression strength of 
    the panel is similar none the less... or so it strikes me.  Perhaps a 
    cable that is thicker directly under the bridge would do the same thing 
    ?  I'm out of my league with that speculation... but I thought I'd throw 
    it out there anyways.
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
    pianoguru@cox.net wrote:
    > ---- Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no> wrote: 
    >   
    >> I still think the whole thing functions more like a cable supported arch 
    >> then anything else.  
    >>     
    >
    > This brings to mind disagreements that I have had with other piano engineers.  Given a rib with a cut radius of 60’, e. g., they would argue that a 60’ radius of an arc segment at one position on a full circle is not the same, when shifted to another position on that circle.  I would argue that a 60’ radius is still a 60’ radius no matter where it is positioned on that circle.  I came to realize that what they were really trying to say is that the thickest part of the rib must always be directly under the long bridge.  I have two problems with this:
    >
    > First, with multiple ribs on a soundboard, each with a predetermined radius, and its high point under the long bridge, as the above would argue, the points of intersection of the end points of each rib with the rim would be quite irregular and if taken “literally” would exaggerate the potato chip effect, think Ruffles (Ruffles has ridges).  If not taken so literally, and the inner rim is surfaced to a more reasonable shape for supporting the crown, what would have otherwise been ripples still constituted unnecessary irregular internal stresses in the soundboard assembly.  
    >
    > Secondly, given your “cable supported arch” analogy, you would normally think of a cable supporting the arch as a cable extended from an end point of the arch to the other end point of the arch, which would place the high point or the arch at its center.  To shift the high point, (or thickest part of the rib, to a position under the long bridge), would be analogous to moving the cable support of the arch from one end point to something short of that, to shift the high point off-center of the arch.  Would not an arch be better supported by a cable between its end points, than from one end point, and something short of the other end point, regardless of where along the arch a force is applied, which would collapse the arch if it were unsupported?  Would this analogy hold true for rib?  Or, does any of this really even matter?
    >
    > Frank Emerson
    >
    >   
    


  • 53.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-25-2008 21:55
    From "David Ilvedson" <ilvey@sbcglobal.net>
    
    "I'm out of my league with that speculation"...quoth the Brekne...
    
    Ric, 
    
    I know you have a lot of enthusiasm for your speculation, but I think you would have
    been quietly murdered ages ago if the List was a piano factory...;-]
    
    David Ilvedson, RPT
    Pacifica, CA  94044
    
    


  • 54.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-26-2008 01:44
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Thanks Frank. 
    
    Isn't it curious it is how truly close minded  this particular piano 
    factory ends up being ? Break the mold here and ....what do you get ?... 
    well David puts it well enough below.  The degree of ridicule used to 
    enforce one particular perspective here is...  well... astounding.  
    Probably has as much to do with the format of the forum as much as 
    anything.  There is this alter - ego effect to internet lists .... lots 
    been written about it these past years.  In any case... its not my 
    problem.  I just put out what I do because its on my mind.  If its worth 
    something then it is... if it isn't, well its not for lack of trying. 
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
            ---- David Ilvedson <ilvey at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
             > "I'm out of my league with that speculation"...quoth the
            Brekne...
    
             > I know you have a lot of enthusiasm for your speculation, but
            I think you would have been quietly murdered ages ago if the
            List was a piano factory...;-]
    
    
        I have worked in several piano factories, and in none of these work
        environments was speculation considered to be a capitol offense.  On
        the contrary, it was/is encouraged and nurtured.  I know that
        contributors to this list are routinely criticized, if not
        lambasted, for using such words as "speculation" and "opinion." but
        such things are essential to developing a theory, and a theory is
        essential to testing, which will either prove or disprove what
        started as "speculation" or an "opinion."  
    
        Frank Emerson
    


  • 55.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-25-2008 23:36
    From Erwinspiano@aol.com
    
    Ron
      one of your funnier zingers. Hey..Why not compile a book of them  from the 
    archives  & do stand up at piano tech conventions all across  the nation. You 
    can do your shtick at the annual killer octave festival.......In  Boston.  Ya 
    there  Jude
     Imagine the roar.
      Dale
    
    Oh, and  a practical question about your being in the CC 
    capital of the universe.  When the RH% gets into the low teens, 
    say 15%, the MC of the soundboards  will be 3.5%, at or before 
    which point a CC board will be flat or have  reverse crowned. 
    Do you have a recognized annual killer octave  season or 
    festival there?
    Ron N
    
    
     
    
    
    
    **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.     
    (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025
    48)
    


  • 56.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-26-2008 00:39
    From <pianoguru@cox.net>
    
    ---- David Ilvedson <ilvey@sbcglobal.net> wrote: 
    > "I'm out of my league with that speculation"...quoth the Brekne...
    
    > I know you have a lot of enthusiasm for your speculation, but I think you would have been quietly murdered ages ago if the List was a piano factory...;-]
    
    I have worked in several piano factories, and in none of these work environments was speculation considered to be a capitol offense.  On the contrary, it was/is encouraged and nurtured.  I know that contributors to this list are routinely criticized, if not lambasted, for using such words as "speculation" and "opinion." but such things are essential to developing a theory, and a theory is essential to testing, which will either prove or disprove what started as "speculation" or an "opinion."  
    
    Frank Emerson
    


  • 57.  Soundboard drydown for installation

    Posted 01-26-2008 01:20
    From Richard Brekne <ricb@pianostemmer.no>
    
    Grin... nah... THIS particular piano factory would no doubt have ah... 
    convinced me to seek employment elsewhere but then the fact is that the 
    vast majority of piano factories would have welcomed me with open 
    arms.... that is to say as long as I followed there local leader. Which 
    I can do easily enough when it required of me.  But this is not supposed 
    to be that kind of place now is it ?  What is one of the main points 
    banged in by one of our own Imadadigadis ??  "Think for yourself"  So I 
    do. :):)
    
    Cheers
    RicB
    
    
            "I'm out of my league with that speculation"...quoth the Brekne...
    
            Ric,
    
    
        I know you have a lot of enthusiasm for your speculation, but I
        think you would have
        been quietly murdered ages ago if the List was a piano factory...;-]
    
        David Ilvedson, RPT
        Pacifica, CA  94044