Piano History

  • 1.  mathushek

    Posted 10-13-2011 21:26
    Thanks Fred.  That sure makes it easier to search.  It appears that may be all the patents he filed.  By the way how did that action feel?  Any good? While we are talking about interesting patents, take a look at this 1864 patent by Spencer Driggs a friend of Mathushek.  Sorry I have no idea how to paste the address as a link.  
    http://www.google.com/patents?id=gBYAAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA2&dq=spencer+driggs&hl=en&ei=UomXTqOnL8Lx0gGC0d3ZBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CEgQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=spencer%20driggs&f=false

    -------------------------------------------
    Jason Leininger
    Las Vegas NM
    412-874-6992
    -------------------------------------------


  • 2.  RE:mathushek

    Posted 10-13-2011 22:49
    About 3 years ago we published the patent drawing for the "Mathushek" action in the Journal with the following text:

    The "Mathushek" Upright Action

                This action is commonly found in Mathushek upright pianos, and as such is called the "Mathushek" action. The patent was obtained by Adolph Stegemann in 1885, some 14 years after Mathushek had left the New Haven Mathushek Piano Company, so it seems unlikely that Frederick Mathushek had anything to do with this action design.

                This is the only "improved repetition" upright action which gained any degree of usage in the era of the upright pianos. A thin spring extends from the top of the backcheck and rides in a groove on the hammer butt. It exerts a separating force between the hammer and the wippen, allowing the jack to reset sooner.

                The action can work very well, but it is hard to tell, in tests of a 120 year old piano, whether the repletion is significantly accelerated. It is clear that when properly adjusted, the action allows reset very close to the bottom of the key stroke.

    Search "Stegemann" to find the patent. [My patent drawing files are currently unavailable as I move to a new computer.] I have one of these pianos. The string rendering is smooth. 130 years old and no broken strings. The bass strings revived well using Bill Bremmer's cleaning technique. Abel recovered the original hammer heads. I'm still many hours away from re-assembly, but the sound given by flicking the hammers by hand is very promising. 

    -------------------------------------------
    Ed Sutton
    Editor
    Piano Technicians Journal
    ed440@mindspring.com
    704-536-7926

    -------------------------------------------








  • 3.  RE:mathushek

    Posted 10-13-2011 23:13

    Thanks Ed!  Great info.  Very interesting piano.  Must be a real pleasure to restore.
    -------------------------------------------
    Jason Leininger
    Las Vegas NM
    412-874-6992
    -------------------------------------------








  • 4.  RE:mathushek

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 10-13-2011 23:43
      |   view attached
    Yes, Arnold Stegemann yields patent 317874, with the drawing Mario Igrec wanted. I might as well post the PDF of drawing and description.

    -------------------------------------------
    Fred Sturm
    University of New Mexico
    fssturm@unm.edu
    "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge, but imagination." - Einstein
    -------------------------------------------


    Attachment(s)



  • 5.  RE:mathushek

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 10-17-2011 17:32
    Thanks Ed, Jason, and Fred. It's interesting that repetition-improved vertical actions like this one or those by Darrell Fandrich and Sauter never became mainstream.

    Jason, thanks for pointing Spence Driggs' patent for a violin-shaped grand with triple overstringing and an electrically insulated soundboard and case!

    -------------------------------------------
    Mario Igrec
    http://www.pianosinsideout.com
    -------------------------------------------


  • 6.  RE:mathushek

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 10-13-2011 23:36
    "By the way how did that action feel?"
    It was an old, worn out upright, out of regulation. Impossible to tell how it might have functioned or felt in good condition. To the eye, it seemed to me like an elegant design for the purpose, better than most others I have seen. A lot of them tend to push back on the jack to get it under sooner (the modern Sauter, for instance). The Mathushek holds the wippen and hammer butt apart - pushes them apart, that is, with the spring - but the spring is inactivated during check. A clever design, at any rate. I would like to see how it works when in good condition, but that is probably just a pipe dream.

    -------------------------------------------
    Fred Sturm
    University of New Mexico
    fssturm@unm.edu
    "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge, but imagination." - Einstein
    -------------------------------------------