Pianotech

  • 1.  An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Posted 08-02-2019 23:01
    The purpose of this post is to explore the mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament.

    I will be using the following source as a reference throughout this post.

    http://www.piano-stopper.de/dl/PTG2008_StopperTemperament.pdf


    The Pythagorean comma is the discrepancy between 12 Pure Fifths and 7 Pure Octaves.

    Pythagorean comma (1st Definition) = (3/2)12 / (2/1)7 = 531441/4096 / 128/1 = 531441/4096 × 1/128 = 531441/524288.


    The frequency ratio of a larger interval can be calculated by multiplying the frequency ratios of the intervals that are smaller than it.

    For example, Pure Major Third (5/4) × Pure Minor Third (6/5) = Pure Fifth (3/2).

    The formula of the Pythagorean comma can be rearranged as follows.

    (3/2)12 = (2/1)7 × Pythagorean comma.

    312/212 = 27 × Pythagorean comma.

    312 = 212 × 27 × Pythagorean comma.

    312 = 219 × Pythagorean comma.

    This formula suggests that 12 Pure Twelfths are larger than 19 Pure Octaves. The discrepancy between them is the Pythagorean comma. Therefore, the Pythagorean comma can also be defined as follows.

    Pythagorean comma (2nd Definition) = 312/219 = 531441/524288.


    Pure 12th Equal Temperament can be constructed by sharpening each of the 19 Pure Octaves by the 19th root of the Pythagorean comma.

    312 = (2/1 × (531441/524288)1/19)19.

    531441 = 531441.


    "The answer to the question why not take any other equal temperamant between pure octaves and pure fifths is given by the recent discovery of the inherent beat symmetries that only occur when the duodecimes are in tune, eliminating beats and therefore producing improved clarity and resonance, as with pure tuned intervals".

    An analysis of the beat rates of the Tempered Fifths and the Tempered Octaves of Pure 12th Equal Temperament must be performed in order to verify this discovery.


    Frequency ratios:

    Pure Twelfth = 3/1 = 3.

    Tempered Fifth = (3/1)7/19 = 37/19.

    Tempered Octave = (3/1)12/19 = 312/19.


    Frequencies:

    A4 (Unison) = 440.00 Hz.

    E5 (Tempered Fifth) = 440.00 Hz × 37/19 = 659.53 Hz.

    A5 (Tempered Octave) = 440.00 Hz × 312/19 = 880.63 Hz.

    E6 (Pure Twelfth) = 440.00 Hz × 3 = 1320.00 Hz.


    Beat rates:

    Tempered Fifth (A4-E5) = Difference between 3rd partial of A4 and 2nd partial of E5 = 440.00 Hz × 3 − 440.00 Hz × 37/19 × 2 = 0.94 Hz.

    Tempered Octave (E5-E6) = Difference between 1st partial of E6 and 2nd partial of E5 = 440.00 Hz × 3 × 1 − 440.00 Hz × 37/19 × 2 = 0.94 Hz.

    Tempered Octave (A4-A5) = Difference between 1st partial of A5 and 2nd partial of A4 = 440.00 Hz × 312/19 × 1 − 440.00 Hz × 2 = 0.62785 Hz.

    Tempered Fifth (A5-E6) = Difference between 3rd partial of A5 and 2nd partial of E6 = 440.00 Hz × 312/19 × 3 − 440.00 Hz × 3 × 2 = 1.88355 Hz.


    Beat ratios:

    A4-E5 / E5-E6 = 0.94 Hz / 0.94 Hz = 1/1.

    A5-E6 / A4-A5 = 1.88355 Hz / 0.62785 Hz = 3/1.

    A beat ratio of 1/1 indicates that the Tempered Fifth (A4-E5) and the Tempered Octave (E5-E6) beat at the same rate. Therefore, this result verifies the discovery of the beat symmetry that occurs when the Tempered Fifth × Tempered Octave = Pure Twelfth relationship (A4-E5-E6) is present.

    A beat ratio of 3/1 indicates that the Tempered Fifth (A5-E6) beats 3 times as much as the Tempered Octave (A4-A5). Coincidentally, the frequency ratio of the Pure Twelfth is 3/1 and a beat ratio of 3/1 occurs when the Tempered Octave × Tempered Fifth = Pure Twelfth relationship (A4-A5-E6) is present.


    Interestingly, Pure 12th Equal Temperament also causes the Pure Fifths and the Pure Octaves to be tempered by the same amount in opposite directions.


    Pure Fifth = 1200 × log2(3/2) = 701.955 cents.

    Tempered Fifth = 1200 × 7/19 × log2(3/1) = 700.720 cents.

    Pure Octave = 1200 × log2(2/1) = 1200.000 cents.

    Tempered Octave = 1200 × 12/19 × log2(3/1) = 1201.235 cents.


    Difference between Tempered Fifth and Pure Fifth in cents = 700.720 cents − 701.955 cents = −1.235 cents.

    Difference between Tempered Octave and Pure Octave in cents = 1201.235 cents − 1200.000 cents = +1.235 cents.


    ------------------------------
    Roshan Kakiya
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Posted 08-03-2019 11:30
    Dear Roshan

    Whilst I admire your mathematics and juggling with which I'd have been familiar with facility four decades ago there's a significant trouble. That occurs because instruments behave differently. Earlier this year I organised a seminar on tuning and the experience from which organ builder Martin Renshaw comes is relevant
    https://youtu.be/k61eHv9piMc?t=983
    in instruments and their buildings reacting in different ways. In the same way is inharmonicity to the piano. As a result whilst one can specify in mathematics to one's heart's content, it's not actually till you're actually tuning and hearing those things with which one's bringing alignment that real tuning happens.

    Sometimes these things bring difficulties of expression. Jason Kanter has been kindly trying to bring my description of what I do to the mathematics of graphing accessible to him and what I do has such significant deviation from standard practice that we can't graph it yet with existing software. It's only when you can apply the mathematics to the real measured world of a real piano that any tuning system can really come to life.

    Best wishes

    David P

    ------------------------------
    David Pinnegar BSc ARCS
    Curator and House Tuner - Hammerwood Park, East Grinstead, Sussex UK
    antespam@gmail.com

    Seminar 6th May 2019 - http://hammerwood.mistral.co.uk/tuning-seminar.pdf "The Importance of Tuning for Better Performance"
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 08-03-2019 12:14
    Strangely enough, this is one mathematical discussion that I actually enjoyed reading. Normally my eyes glaze over with this type of stuff. Oddly, not this time. 

    Very interesting.

    Pwg

    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    603-686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Posted 08-03-2019 12:56
    You're certainly correct David. However, Roshan clearly states: "The purpose of this post is to explore the mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament." Doesn't there have to be some mathematics involved before you start tuning? It's all way over my head but I appreciate the exploration. 

    ------------------------------
    "That Tuning Guy"
    Scott Kerns
    www.thattuningguy.com
    Tunic OnlyPure, TuneLab & PianoMeter user
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 08-04-2019 08:02
    What we're talking about here is the "compass" of the temperament octave, the width of the octave that the 12 chromatic steps have to fit within. There's direct acoustic proof that a 3:1 octave is wider than a 4:2 octave, but no similar proof that it's narrower than the 6:3, only empirical observation. But it's safe to say that a temperament based on a "3:1 compass" would have a stretch somewhere between these two.

    But what has left me less than impressed about miracle-of-the-21st-century P12 temperament is that it's not backwards compatible, i.e.., it can't be done aurally. It is simple enough for an ETD to do: 1.) calculate the complete tuning based on a 2:1 temperament, 2.) note the difference in off-sets between the 2:1 octaves and the 3:1 P12s, and 3.) widen the temperament semitones to reflect this. In fact any self-respecting ETD allows the the choice of 3:1 as the basic "octave" interval.

    But as was quickly pointed out, even the ETD has to know at each step in the temperament, what the off-set is at that specific step. Kind of like arriving at the proper tempering of a 5th on a given piano, tuning a circle of 5ths/4ths aurally. You don't know the correct answer until you've been around the mulberry bush.

    ------------------------------
    William Ballard RPT
    WBPS
    Saxtons River VT
    802-869-9107

    "Our lives contain a thousand springs
    and dies if one be gone
    Strange that a harp of a thousand strings
    should keep in tune so long."
    ...........Dr. Watts, "The Continental Harmony,1774
    +++++++++++++++++++++
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Posted 08-04-2019 08:16
      |   view attached
    What you're saying hear about finding 20th Century ET unsatisfactory is supported by the attached article from 1940 with measurements then of the best possible tuners' results on page 536, figure 6.

    Abandoning Equal Temperament Michael Gamble known here tuned the Steinway D for 
    https://youtu.be/L2kERGR069o?t=3551
    https://youtu.be/L2kERGR069o?t=6513
    in a manner similar to mine.

    Best wishes

    David P

    ------------------------------
    David Pinnegar BSc ARCS
    Curator and House Tuner - Hammerwood Park, East Grinstead, Sussex UK
    antespam@gmail.com

    Seminar 6th May 2019 - http://hammerwood.mistral.co.uk/tuning-seminar.pdf "The Importance of Tuning for Better Performance"
    ------------------------------

    Attachment(s)



  • 7.  RE: An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Posted 08-04-2019 10:17
    A4 = 440 Hz has become the internationally standardised tuning frequency (ISO 16:1975).

    Source: https://www.iso.org/standard/3601.html


    Could equal temperament become the internationally standardised tuning system in the future?

    ------------------------------
    Roshan Kakiya
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Posted 08-04-2019 10:31
    For what purpose? For selling pianos or getting the instruments to express better the music?

    ET has been the de facto international standard for the past 100-120 years and some would go to nearly 180 years.

    Why I've been working in the opposite direction is because the music that we're being subjected to now has forgotten much of its soul. When musicians play an instrument tuned by me in contrast the sentiment is nearly universally "why aren't all instruments tuned like this?"

    In my opinion ET has had its day and your current work well underneath the crest of the wave.

    Best wishes

    David P

    --
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    David Pinnegar, B.Sc., A.R.C.S.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    +44 1342 850594





  • 9.  RE: An Exploration of the Mathematics of Pure 12th Equal Temperament

    Posted 08-04-2019 11:44
    "In my opinion ET has had its day and your current work well underneath the crest of the wave" (quote by David Pinnegar).

    The current prevalence of equal temperament suggests that the opposite is true instead.

    Would a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of equal temperament and unequal temperament indicate which of these two tuning systems is more beneficial? An exploration of the mathematics of both tuning systems could form a part of this analysis. There are many other factors that could also be considered such as the current practical methods of tuning and the current ways of dealing with inharmonicity.

    ------------------------------
    Roshan Kakiya
    ------------------------------