FWIW The current victim errrrr.. project on my workbench is a model B from 1979. With the original parts (teflon) the spread is112.1 mm. With new Steinway (Renner) parts the spread is 113.3 mm. All in all, not nearly the problem that a bad action ratio mentioned in the other Steinway, thread poses on this one.
------------------------------
Karl Roeder
Pompano Beach FL
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-17-2024 14:45
From: Peter Grey
Subject: Steinway action spread
Karl,
Yes we're talking essentially 1mm. And...it seems to me from what I'm observing at present that if I were to change it to 112 or less (e.g., tilting the whippen flanges) I would actually end up increasing the leverage which would increase the touchweight, etc etc. So I guess...if it ain't broke don't fix it.
After I restring it I still have the clear option of replacing shanks and hammers, which if I did, I would use WNG and likely Ronsen.
Peter Grey Piano Doctor
------------------------------
Peter Grey
Stratham NH
(603) 686-2395
pianodoctor57@gmail.com
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-17-2024 12:48
From: Karl Roeder
Subject: Steinway action spread
Mr Grey,
Pre 1984 the action spread was nominally 4.381" or 111.3 mm also known as 4 3/8".
Post 1984 it changed to 4.395" or 111.6mm also known as 4 25/64".
I don't recall ever finding one where these distances prevailed. I think the discrepancy may have more to do with the manufacture of the repetition flange and the hammershank flange. The way the rails were soldered in also added a lot of variation.
The distances you mention don't seem like they would cause much of a problem.
------------------------------
Karl Roeder
Pompano Beach FL