Hi Blaine,
There's not really enough information for a conclusion here, only educated guesses. Since there are three B's and two were evidently ok in the downweight area, my guess is this is a geometry problem, a weigh-off problem, or a geometry problem. Or combination of those. My questions would be:
1. What is the downweight and upweight of a few notes? 1, 20 and 40 would be interesting.
2. What year is the offending B?
Yes, Steinway sometimes didn't place the capstans in optimal position. The reason is they didn't get the plate in the right place sometimes relative to the front of the piano. After the new keyset is placed in a piano with that issue, they plop the stack in place with standard bore hammers so that the hammer strike is correct, but the error all goes into the capstan positition, which causes the key ratio to be something between a little wrong to wildly wrong.
Since this may be a geometry issue, I'd suggest you fill out our geometry web form at:
https://www.reyburn.com/geometry.html
This is a free service, we can analyze the geometry and let you know possible fixes.
I'd also like to know the spread on 1 and 88. That's sometimes of spec and contributes to thw problems.
I hope I can help, best regards,
------------------------------
Dean Reyburn, RPT
Reyburn Pianoworks
Reyburn CyberTuner
1-616-498-9854
dean@reyburn.comwww.reyburnpianoworks.comwww.cybertuner.comwww.reyburntools.comFacebook:
www.facebook.com/dean.reyburn------------------------------