Pianotech

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

That's an interesting request

Peter Grey Piano Doctor 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

That's an interesting response. Do we have issues that I'm unaware of?

I wasn't referring to anyone who has responded to this so far.  But I think there are people on this list who seem to enjoy being the antagonist. Perhaps people consider me one of those people I don't know. But those people who are prone to grievance  attacks on me I would like to be able to block rather than whine to the PTG to have the post taken down. I don't think that's an unreasonable request. I'm not sure why you seem to be taking it personally.

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

I could be wrong...but I think Don was being serious and jocular simultaneously. 

Peter Grey Piano Doctor 

That's an interesting response. Do we have issues that I'm unaware of?

I wasn't referring to anyone who has responded to this so far.  But I think there are people on this list who seem to enjoy being the antagonist. Perhaps people consider me one of those people I don't know. But those people who are prone to grievance  attacks on me I would like to be able to block rather than whine to the PTG to have the post taken down. I don't think that's an unreasonable request. I'm not sure why you seem to be taking it personally.

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

It's quite possible I'm reading it the wrong way. It wouldn't be the first time. I did post it to PTG – L which is probably where it belongs. It was a legitimate question about website options, not meant to be an editorial piece  

I could be wrong...but I think Don was being serious and jocular simultaneously. 

Peter Grey Piano Doctor 

That's an interesting response. Do we have issues that I'm unaware of?

I wasn't referring to anyone who has responded to this so far.  But I think there are people on this list who seem to enjoy being the antagonist. Perhaps people consider me one of those people I don't know. But those people who are prone to grievance  attacks on me I would like to be able to block rather than whine to the PTG to have the post taken down. I don't think that's an unreasonable request. I'm not sure why you seem to be taking it personally.

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

David, I hear you, regardless of what you were trying to specify or how I perceived it. These threads are supposedly monitored. But there is way too much to stay on top of to be truly effective, and comments may not be interpreted the same. There is no "mute" or "block" option here as exists with other platforms. But there is an option of "mark as inappropriate" that will at least garner the attention of a moderator. Maybe that's what you meant as "whining". You might also suggest that block or mute capability be added. 

It's quite possible I'm reading it the wrong way. It wouldn't be the first time. I did post it to PTG – L which is probably where it belongs. It was a legitimate question about website options, not meant to be an editorial piece  

I could be wrong...but I think Don was being serious and jocular simultaneously. 

Peter Grey Piano Doctor 

That's an interesting response. Do we have issues that I'm unaware of?

I wasn't referring to anyone who has responded to this so far.  But I think there are people on this list who seem to enjoy being the antagonist. Perhaps people consider me one of those people I don't know. But those people who are prone to grievance  attacks on me I would like to be able to block rather than whine to the PTG to have the post taken down. I don't think that's an unreasonable request. I'm not sure why you seem to be taking it personally.

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

David, I hear you, regardless of what you were trying to specify or how I perceived it. These threads are supposedly monitored. But there is way too much to stay on top of to be truly effective, and comments may not be interpreted the same. There is no "mute" or "block" option here as exists with other platforms. But there is an option of "mark as inappropriate" that will at least garner the attention of a moderator. Maybe that's what you meant as "whining". You might also suggest that block or mute capability be added. 

It's quite possible I'm reading it the wrong way. It wouldn't be the first time. I did post it to PTG – L which is probably where it belongs. It was a legitimate question about website options, not meant to be an editorial piece  

I could be wrong...but I think Don was being serious and jocular simultaneously. 

Peter Grey Piano Doctor 

That's an interesting response. Do we have issues that I'm unaware of?

I wasn't referring to anyone who has responded to this so far.  But I think there are people on this list who seem to enjoy being the antagonist. Perhaps people consider me one of those people I don't know. But those people who are prone to grievance  attacks on me I would like to be able to block rather than whine to the PTG to have the post taken down. I don't think that's an unreasonable request. I'm not sure why you seem to be taking it personally.

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

David, I hear you, regardless of what you were trying to specify or how I perceived it. These threads are supposedly monitored. But there is way too much to stay on top of to be truly effective, and comments may not be interpreted the same. There is no "mute" or "block" option here as exists with other platforms. But there is an option of "mark as inappropriate" that will at least garner the attention of a moderator. Maybe that's what you meant as "whining". You might also suggest that block or mute capability be added. 

It's quite possible I'm reading it the wrong way. It wouldn't be the first time. I did post it to PTG – L which is probably where it belongs. It was a legitimate question about website options, not meant to be an editorial piece  

I could be wrong...but I think Don was being serious and jocular simultaneously. 

Peter Grey Piano Doctor 

That's an interesting response. Do we have issues that I'm unaware of?

I wasn't referring to anyone who has responded to this so far.  But I think there are people on this list who seem to enjoy being the antagonist. Perhaps people consider me one of those people I don't know. But those people who are prone to grievance  attacks on me I would like to be able to block rather than whine to the PTG to have the post taken down. I don't think that's an unreasonable request. I'm not sure why you seem to be taking it personally.

What precipitated this notion? If we were to hypothetically enact such a policy, what would the limitations be?

Non-members? While I see some validity in protecting PTG and its members as misinformation is pervasive and

becoming the norm, caution is prudent so as not to be instigators of invalid censorship; for the good of our community as well as guarding our reputation.

Current events and the media being the perfect examples. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult. 

I propose we add the feature of being able to block individuals from our own feed.  Can't be that difficult.