No argument there. 😉
Original Message:
Sent: 03-15-2026 16:57
From: David Love
Subject: Number of coils in restringing
Becket alignment won't help you there
------------------------------
David Love RPT
www.davidlovepianos.com
davidlovepianos@comcast.net
415 407 8320
Original Message:
Sent: 03-15-2026 16:50
From: Peter Grey
Subject: Number of coils in restringing
Until you start competing with the lid prop... 😉
Peter Grey Piano Doctor
------------------------------
Peter Grey
Stratham NH
(603) 686-2395
pianodoctor57@gmail.com
Original Message:
Sent: 03-15-2026 14:06
From: David Love
Subject: Number of coils in restringing
While technically that is correct, the differences aren't that great.
What you're concerned with is the maximum deviation of the tuning lever handle for tuning pins that aren't similarly aligned.
To determine that you have to look at how a square tuning pin works with a star shaped tuning lever tip.
A tuning pin has four-fold rotational symmetry, it repeats every 90 degrees. The star tip has 8-fold symmetry (two squares) it repeats every 45 degrees.
So, the maximum deviation within the tuning tip is 1/2 of that or 22.5 degrees (once you pass the halfway mark you are into another position within the star).
To convert that to clock face rotation you first have to covert each clock face number to degrees. Since there are 12 hours the number of degrees between hours is 30 degrees. 22.5/30 = .75 or 45 minutes of clock time.
So, if you tune ideally at the 1:00 position, the *maximum* deviation would be 45 minutes of clock time or from 12:15 to 1:45. Most deviations would fall under that. Even at the maximum, while not insignificant, it's not enough to cause ergonomic problems or affect speed, or control.
------------------------------
David Love RPT
www.davidlovepianos.com
davidlovepianos@comcast.net
415 407 8320
Original Message:
Sent: 03-14-2026 23:46
From: Tim Foster
Subject: Number of coils in restringing
David, this is very helpful information, as usual. As to the visual element of aligned beckets, it does function to help the tuner keep a relatively consistent tuning hammer position on the pins, so I think this aspect goes slightly beyond visual conformity.
------------------------------
Tim Foster RPT
New Oxford PA
(470) 231-6074
Original Message:
Sent: 03-14-2026 22:36
From: David Love
Subject: Number of coils in restringing
The tradition is 3 coils and 4 in the top capo section. The reasoning is uniform distance of the lowest coil from the block or plate. The reasons for that are to help reduce flagpolling and the side benefit of keeping the pin from being driven deeper in the top section to accommodate that because the wire is thinner. Less flagpolling without increasing the torque in the top section makes fine tuning the high treble easier.
Note that the increasing string length in the lower part of the piano results in more elongation so if you want to maintain a three coil pattern you'll have to cut the wire progressively shorter.
Functional differences are probably marginal enough it doesn't really matter other than the visual element. Uniform coils with the beckets pointing in the same direction is a nice look.
------------------------------
David Love RPT
www.davidlovepianos.com
davidlovepianos@comcast.net
415 407 8320
Original Message:
Sent: 03-04-2026 18:36
From: Peter Grey
Subject: Number of coils in restringing
Curious...
Does anyone routinely (or for some specific reason) put more than three coils on pins in their stringing? I've seen it occasionally. I think I recall seeing as many as 5 coils on some of Peter Mohr's work when he was still doing rebuilds in Manchester, NH. And, I've seen 4 coils on some older Steinway uprights.
I don't know if there is any functional difference in doing so...curious
Peter Grey Piano Doctor
------------------------------
Peter Grey
Stratham NH
(603) 686-2395
pianodoctor57@gmail.com
------------------------------