Pianotech

Expand all | Collapse all

It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

  • 1.  It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-09-2024 01:22

    IT'S ALL ABOUT THE PERFECT 5th: A Musicological Perspective 

    I am writing this little essay 'for piano tuners' but 'from the perspective of a musicologist.' Let's talk about what is actually important in music regarding the intervals we use and how we tune.

    Overall, perfect fifths are fundamental to the structure and sound of Western music, playing a key role in harmony, chord construction, tuning systems, tonal relationships, and overall musical expression.

    The intervals of the octave and the perfect fifth have remained the two most important building blocks in Western music; the octave providing the framework of stability and repetition; and the fifth, generating the primary harmonic driving force, the dominant to tonic cadence.

    The 'perfect fifth' is more consonant (consonance vs. dissonance), or stable, than any other interval except the unison and the octave. In some sense, it is even more important than the octave, which I will explain. It occurs above the root of all major (and minor) chords (triads) and their extensions. Until the late 19th century, it was often referred to by one of its Greek names, diapente. Its inversion is the perfect fourth. The octave of the fifth is the twelfth, hence, the 'Pure-12th Piano Tuning' achieves the musical goal of a 'Perfect 5th.' Violins, violas, and cellos  are tuned in 5ths. The 'Circle of 5ths' is a fundamental concept. So, it wasn't by accident that the first steps towards harmony in Western music started with the first intervals of the overtone series. The early polyphony of the middle ages consisted in one or more voice parts accompanying the cantus firmus, often in parallel motion using the interval of the octave, fifth or fourth (the first intervals found in the overtone series).    

    Harmony: Perfect fifths are considered one of the most consonant intervals in music. When two notes are played a perfect fifth apart, they sound pleasing and stable to the ear. This stability forms the foundation of harmony in Western music.

    Chord Building: Perfect fifths are essential for building chords. In traditional Western music theory, chords are often constructed by stacking notes in intervals of a third (major or minor). The perfect fifth is a common interval found in many chords, such as the power chord (used in rock music) and the perfect fifth interval itself forms the basis of the dominant triad in tonal music.

    Tuning Systems: Perfect fifths are crucial in tuning systems. In the context of equal temperament tuning (the tuning system commonly used in Western music), the perfect fifth is the interval that is tempered or adjusted to allow all keys to be played equally well. This compromise is necessary to ensure that music can be played in all keys without sounding out of tune.

    Functional Harmony: In tonal music, the perfect fifth plays a significant role in establishing tonal centers and creating harmonic tension and resolution. For example, the perfect fifth relationship between the tonic and dominant is fundamental in establishing tonality and creating a sense of resolution when moving from the dominant back to the tonic.

    Melodic and Harmonic Context: Perfect fifths are prevalent in melodies and harmonies across various musical genres. They provide a sense of stability, direction, and resolution, contributing to the overall structure and coherence of musical compositions.

    On a personal note, in my early years as an orchestral trombonist, it was obvious that an important role of the trombone section included providing underlying support chords. Three trombones can provide a triad chord. The section member who had the 5th had to be 'perfect', even more so than the member who had the 3rd, since half the literature is in a minor key.

    Now, let's look at the math. An octave-based equal temperament puts the 5th  at 

    2^(7/12) = 1.4983, 

    where the perfect 5th is 1.5. 

    Therefore, the 5th nearly 2 ¢ flat, since 

    1200*log2(1.4983 / 1.5) = -1.955 ¢.

    Now let's examine the 5th using the 'Pure 12th System'

    3^(7/19) = 1.4989

    1200*log2(1.4989 / 1.5) = -1.2347 ¢ 

    Therefore, 1.955 – 1.2347  = 0.7203 ¢, or in other words, the Pure 12th System produced a 5th that is ¾ ¢ better to being a perfect 5th. But, more importantly, it produces an absolutely Perfect 12th, therefore, the 5th above the octave IS A PERFECT 5th!

    Now ask yourself, why would a piano tuner, from a musicological perspective, want to even consider tuning using 3rds, 10ths, 17ths and counting beats from these 3rds? Yes, historically, it is easier to 'count beats' of progressive 3rds, but we now have 'new technology' that eliminates the need for this. The musicologist is telling us about the fundamental importance of the Perfect 5th! We now can achieve it with the 12th if we use new technology.

    Steven Norsworthy

    May 8, 2024

    http://rf2bits.com/

    http://PianoSens.com

    ------------------------------
    Steven Norsworthy
    Cardiff By The Sea CA

    steven@rf2bits.com
    (619) 964-0101
    ------------------------------



  • 2.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-09-2024 06:16
    Steven - sorry to potentially upset you but one can't look at fifths whilst ignoring thirds. Perfect 5ths result in Pythagorean tuning and the prevalence of this caused Meantone tuning to hold sway when thirds became harmonically important.

    Both Meantone and Pythagorean have their place but music and tuning have moved on a little since then on keyboard instrument and the 18th and 19th centuries were all about finding compromises which perfect fifths don't allow. 

    Ron Koval's temperament demonstrates helpful pragmatism and it would be great if perhaps you might be able to try it and see what a perfect 12th methodology of extending it throughout the instrument might result in.

    Best wishes 

    David P 

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    David Pinnegar, B.Sc., A.R.C.S.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    +44 1342 850594





  • 3.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-09-2024 06:27

    I stand "Cantus Firmus"



    ------------------------------
    Steven Norsworthy
    PianoSens
    Cardiff By The Sea CA
    (619) 964-0101
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 05-09-2024 08:47

    Question: Why would a piano tuner, from a musicological perspective, consider using thirds, tenths, and seventeenths, given the fundamental importance of the Perfect 5th to tune a piano? 

    Answer: The use of interval comparisons using thirds, tenths, seventeenths, and, in particular, minor thirds can be used to accurately measure and adjust the temper of octaves and fifths. They allow one to form and execute a tuning strategy that produces the best musical result for each piano they tune. 



    ------------------------------
    Rick Butler RPT
    The Butler School of Piano Technology
    Bowie MD
    240 396 7480
    RickRickRickRickRick
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 05-09-2024 10:27

    Another (but not necessarily the smartest, best,  or most authoritative) answer is: On a well scaled (and generally reasonably large) instrument...no argument whatsoever from an ET perspective. However,  on a PSO (of which there are MANY in existence and often comprise a high % of the typical piano tuner's clientele ownership and thus a proportionately higher % of exposure to requiring 'best compromise' theory and practice for optimal musical usage) it simply doesn't always "work as advertised". Therefore we need other "tools" at our disposal to effect a reasonably acceptable result. 

    Additionally, in the case of PSO's that are used almost universally for beginners or "elementary" playing, there exist highly satisfactory compromises that will enhance the musicality of the most used key signatures at the expense of the least (or never) used key signatures, and if mutually agreed upon can produce a superior result under such limited playing capacity. 

    Each temperament scheme has its place and since piano tuners are the ones doing it (in most cases) it's up to us to determine (in consultation with whoever is playing (and/or paying) what is the best application under the circumstances. 

    Others may disagree... 🤔 

    Peter Grey Piano Doctor 



    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    (603) 686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-09-2024 12:47

    Peter, from what I can gather, you will need 'not just any app', but an app that has accurate full IH (some do and some don't) in addition to an accurate tuning curve generation for Pure 12th. Given those conditions, the result will be fine on any scale piano. I'd recommend a consultation with a Pure-12th expert who has evaluated the apps that provide this. I think we both know someone who can opine privately on this from experience! --- Steve N.



    ------------------------------
    Steven Norsworthy
    PianoSens
    Cardiff By The Sea CA
    (619) 964-0101
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-09-2024 14:50
    Steven - with respect there's no better way to deal with bass than by ear. Machine-led inharmonicity curves can work, yes, but shorter strings offer such choices of which harmonics or sets of harmonics to focus upon so that, as you're aware of many equations which have more than one solution, in the tuning world no singular answer is the only one. Machine generated solutions of course will work but might not be the only solution which sounds good.

    I'll often say to people that one approach might achieve good results but that it might be only the first iteration. The important thing is to achieve consistency in the harmonics or set of harmonics that one's tuning to accord, and as to which octave above they're going to be resonating with.

    If one's only tuning 9ft instruments then it's like going to an island which might have three months of rain but visiting on a sunny spring day with strong warm bright sunshine and think that it's always like that. Consistency between instruments of different sizes is really very difficult to achieve and one solution might not fit all. With short instruments it might well come down to a matter of taste and musicality rather than mechanically derived exactitude.

    Best wishes

    David P


    --
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    David Pinnegar, B.Sc., A.R.C.S.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    +44 1342 850594





  • 8.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 05-11-2024 01:15

    Steven,

    Thank you for sharing this perspective. I agree that the fifth is incredibly important for many of the reasons you state, but I would disagree with your conclusion that tuners should tune P12 for the reasons you gave. This is not to say that I don't think there is value in P12 tuning and if you or others like it, by all means use it. 

    Certainly, parallel organum of the Middle Ages utilizes the P5, but during the Middle Ages the M3 was considered dissonant. In Pythagorean tuning, M3s are 22% wide from perfect if memory serves. In ET they are around 14%. As music developed in western society, 3rds became a function of consonance in music in contrast to earlier times. Tempering at least some 5ths not only allowed avoiding the wolf but also allowed for more pleasing (slower beating) 3rds. 

    If there is any doubt about the importance of 3rds in western music, consider the 5ths that were compromised (tempered) almost universally in well and Victorian temperaments, following the circle of fifths: C-G, G-D, D-A, A-E. This was very intentional, since this sequence placed E closer to C, in some cases making a nearly P3. Well temperaments usually prioritize nearly P3rds in the keys closer to C in the circle of 5ths, such as G and F, all of which keys were considered the most consonant, not because of P5s but because of the 3rds. 3rds were in fact foundational to western music as we know it, and the most consonant keys had the most tempered fifths.

    The statement "perfect 5ths are essential for building chords" is not correct. While 5ths are essential, P5s are not as I have demonstrated above. Even the relatively rapidly beating G-D in Kirnberger III is partially masked by the 3rd in a G major triad.

    In functional harmony, it is correct to see significance in the Tonic/Dominant (I/V) relationship, but again this is not a necessarily a P5 relationship. Further, it is not so much the fifth comprising the root of the dominant chord that creates tension, but the tritone in the V7 which is created from the 5th and 7th partials of the dominant root. This translates primarily to the 3rd and 7th of the chord being creators of tension that "want" to resolve back to the tonic (I).

    For these reasons, I do not recommend P12 tuning universally, especially for classical music. P12 tuning by necessity makes faster beating 3rds which I believe I have given a sufficient argument as to their historic importance in the development of western music. Functional harmony depends on 5ths for certain, but the P5s as you stated in the OP are not necessary for functional harmony at all. Since they are not necessary for functional harmony, P12 tuning is not necessarily the best tuning for western music.



    ------------------------------
    Tim Foster RPT
    New Oxford PA
    (470) 231-6074
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-11-2024 08:12

    Steven and others. There are a lot of temperaments that are candidates for use in tuning an acoustic piano, particularly with the assistance of an ETD. The excellent creativity in this area includes what we have recently seen in this listserver.

     

    There is Steven's special P12 ET as an example, as well as Kent Swafford's extensive work with P12 ET. Ron Koval has his KV1.3 and KV2.1 and more. David Pinnegar has several historic temperaments that he commonly uses, such as Kellner and Werkmeister, among the hundreds that are available. And all the variants of Equal Beating Victorian Temperament, and more. And don't forget the industry standard octave-based ET that most of us use. All with potential variations such as stretching octaves and adjusting fifths or other intervals. Not to mention variation of pitch (versus A440) and other refinements.

     

    My point: Some tuners like myself can use some assistance, particularly when we talk to a customer and try to explain what the current tuning options are in our industry (versus the industry standard). Please consider the following for a start:

     

    Documentation is needed. Modern digital-based is preferred, like the Scala freeware. https://huygens-fokker.org/scala/ It is made for documenting keyboard temperaments, and can be used to, in turn, interface to MIDI keyboards and other digital instruments.

     

    Demonstrations are essential. I know that an all-digital piano capability (including the hybrid piano), or a MIDI keyboard with a controller like Pianoteq, is a preferred option and that some of our customers are already equipped for such (including music schools and university music departments). It should only take a few minutes to do various recordings. But let's think initial/simple at the start. Some A-B audio recordings from the same music played on different acoustic piano tunings for comparison use would be a great start. Regards, Norman.



    ------------------------------
    Norman Brickman
    Potomac Piano Service
    Potomac, Maryland
    potomacpiano@verizon.net
    https://potomacpiano.com
    (301) 983.9321
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-12-2024 23:40

    Norman,

    You previously heard these but some did not.

    Here are the intervals played and recorded after I tuned Pure12ths: Playing 5ths, Octaves, 12ths, consecutively and chromatically.

    https://soundcloud.com/snorsworthy/piano-tuning-check-with-5ths-8ths-12ths



    ------------------------------
    Steven Norsworthy
    PianoSens
    Cardiff By The Sea CA
    (619) 964-0101
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 05-13-2024 01:26

    Norman, here are 3 Pianoteq generated samples:

    https://soundcloud.com/stevelehmannmusic/sets/alternative-tuning-systems



    ------------------------------
    Steven Rosenthal RPT
    Honolulu HI
    (808) 521-7129
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-13-2024 07:48

    Steven, thank you for the samples. I'm afraid, however, that I probably failed – I liked all three recordings: Zarlino, Pythagorean, and Equal. Others might be more "atuned" to different temperaments than myself and will hopefully also respond here. And of course the particular piece being played will make a difference as to which temperament is preferred.

     

    Unfortunately, your type of demonstration in turn illustrates a conundrum I have, and why I think that discussion of multiple tuning temperaments on this PTG forum is important but is also counter-productive to all here who enjoy working on acoustic pianos. We all understand why in the early 1900's octave-based ET was the only appropriate choice to tune pianos. But in 2024, if I introduce alternative tunings to my customers, and since they play music of multiple composers written for multiple musical keys, I worry that I become a walking advertisement for (a) their purchase and use of all-digital pianos (including hybrid pianos), or (b) their use of a keyboard + MIDI environment. Music schools are already following this path (this is the digital age!). Regards, Norman.



    ------------------------------
    Norman Brickman
    Potomac Piano Service
    Potomac, Maryland
    potomacpiano@verizon.net
    https://potomacpiano.com
    (301) 983.9321
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-13-2024 08:11
    Norman -
    "But in 2024, if I introduce alternative tunings to my customers, and since they play music of multiple composers written for multiple musical keys,"

    This is the purpose of a good non-equal temperament. There are candidates that numbers of us have researched and used successfully and even universally which can cope with multiple musical keys and multiple composers. As a footnote to that, tuning isn't always intended to sound "nice" so one does need to find something that covers an acceptable spectrum of strengths from Indian Passanda or Korma flavouring through to something stronger without necessarily touching the hottest of Vindaloo. 

    What becomes particularly interesting is that Ron Koval's temperament, if I haven't got it wrong, is difficult to nail by ear and benefits specifically from ETD setting of the scale. The area in which Stephen N's device and research could be particularly helpful is in combination of Ron Koval's temperament whilst tuning to perfect 12ths rather than perfect octaves could put the resonance of 3rd harmonics on steroids. 

    Steven N - 
    The sound samples you've recorded are demonstrating perfect 5ths and neglecting 3rds. This is suitable for Mediaeval music  but the whole point of temperament in our intervening centuries is how major thirds can be well accommodated and exploited in harmony. Listening again to other sound samples, with respect, I suspect that you're luxuriating in the listening bubble of the innate sound of one of the world's longest pianos rather than in the communication of the composer's music. The recordings are rather like getting into a Rolls Royce and sinking into the beautifully comfortable leather seats. Others of us have to cope with the manual gearboxes of Ferraris or the idiosyncrasies of a Citroen 2CV - both in terms of instruments and repertoire.

    Were you to be able to demonstrate that your device together with ETD exactitude can help to bring forward a P12 extension of the temperament octave up and down the instrument in Ron's tuning, you'll have a winner. 

    Steven R - 
    thanks so much for your Pianoteq examples. Chromatically the examples of Zarlino bring one to cringe but in musical use it's rather lovely, whilst Pythagorean isn't at all so musical. If perhaps you might be able to repeat both examples in Pianoteq "Well Temperament" a good compromise might be found in that realm

    Best wishes

    David P
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    David Pinnegar, B.Sc., A.R.C.S.
    antespam@gmail.com
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    +44 1342 850594






  • 14.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 05-14-2024 17:39

    I have been repeatedly amazed at seeing different pianists relish extremely fast RBI's that typically make me cringe a little. Everyone hears things a little differently. David's tuning style has both extremes of  quietude and "aggression". Yet musicians hear these in a different context than piano technicians (I think). It's an interesting paradox. 

    Peter Grey Piano Doctor 



    ------------------------------
    Peter Grey
    Stratham NH
    (603) 686-2395
    pianodoctor57@gmail.com
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-14-2024 18:37
    Dear Peter

    Yes - you're on track here - people do hear things differently, split between technicians and musicians.

    There are some who really play at home and luxuriate in a sound of the instrument, whatever the repertoire or music, it's the instrument that they're enjoying. Of course there's an overlap with technicians in this category whilst there are some for whom the instrument isn't the end in itself and for whom the instrument is the tool of expression.

    As well as temperament I'm put to puzzle over unisons. Last year I did a tuning for a recording engineer who likes also to do his own tuning. The exactitude to which he put me on unisons was torture with a Steinway B, and for whom the experience of non-standard temperament was useful, but he wanted the standard sound that he'd come to expect out of his instrument. In a recent comparison recording of temperaments I was able to tune a Steinway with some degree of exactitude and a Bechstein which was impossible to tame. Comments from the technician community favoured the Steinway and said that the Bechstein was terrible whilst musicians said that the Steinway was dead and that the Bechstein was alive.

    When one's focussing the instrument into forms of resonance, there is a spectrum between stillness and movement. Possibly stillness in the temperament might require movement in the unisons whilst a busy tuning might require stillness in the unisons.

    So there is a spectrum of answers in which perhaps none are right but some are useful. It's in this context that I ask existential questions about whether we're tuning for the instrument or tuning for the music. Whilst tuning for the living room or the showroom where the sound of the instrument is enjoyed just as the sound and pleasure of an expensive hifi system might require one style of tuning, I'm tuning for the concert context where our purpose is to engage audiences with the music and this is something with which there are musicians eager to exploit.

    Likewise there is a swathe of audiences who are ready for the musicians' perspective as exemplified by https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JF3YzTG7lU in the comment "I'm kinda wishing I never came across these beautiful unequal temp videos on you tube, because now hearing classical / romantic music on equal sound horrible to me." and this is echoed across the corpus of such recordings. On another  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJT5Q6HooyA "This is the most moved I've ever been by a single piece of music, and I've known and loved Zimerman's top-notch recording dozens of times. The difference is nothing short of stunning." and on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxiphZ7fGQ0 "I think many pieces have lost their character after the mass adaptation of equal temperament. Unfortunate. I hope more work will be done beyond the scope of academic research and we'd have access to performances done using the temperament in which the composer has used to compose the music."

    This is why if Stephen N can adapt his device and P12 style of resonance to Ron Koval's gentler inequalities it may be a very successful bridge between the opposing preferences between the technician and the musician worlds.

    Best wishes

    David P



    --
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    David Pinnegar, B.Sc., A.R.C.S.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    +44 1342 850594





  • 16.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 05-14-2024 20:18

    David, what is the accepted root note for UT's?



    ------------------------------
    Steven Rosenthal RPT
    Honolulu HI
    (808) 521-7129
    ------------------------------



  • 17.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-15-2024 15:23

    Colleagues, in compliance with Patrick's request, and then seeing thereafter extremely repetitive long replies from one in particular that were an afront after Patrick made the polite request on the rules, I marked those particular long replies that were off-topic as inappropriate. For those who made comments after, I enjoyed reading your on-topic replies and invite you to repost them. If we keep venturing into UT, I request those interested in UT to start a whole new thread on that subject. Let's keep the subject on the original subject matter. Kindly, and professionally, Steve. 



    ------------------------------
    Steven Norsworthy
    PianoSens
    Cardiff By The Sea CA
    (619) 964-0101
    ------------------------------



  • 18.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Registered Piano Technician
    Posted 05-15-2024 19:50

    I am a little confused why my critique of the OP was removed, presumably marked "inappropriate." It was a direct reply to the content of the OP from a musicological perspective. I would like to repost since it was in fact on topic.

    ___________

    Steven,

    Thank you for sharing this perspective. I agree that the fifth is incredibly important for many of the reasons you state, but I would disagree with your conclusion that tuners should tune P12 for the reasons you gave. This is not to say that I don't think there is value in P12 tuning and if you or others like it, by all means use it. 

    Certainly, parallel organum of the Middle Ages utilizes the P5, but during the Middle Ages the M3 was considered dissonant. In Pythagorean tuning, M3s are 22% wide from perfect if memory serves. In ET they are around 14%. As music developed in western society, 3rds became a function of consonance in music in contrast to earlier times. Tempering at least some 5ths not only allowed avoiding the wolf but also allowed for more pleasing (slower beating) 3rds. 

    If there is any doubt about the importance of 3rds in western music, consider the 5ths that were compromised almost universally in well and Victorian temperaments, following the circle of fifths: C-G, G-D, D-A, A-E. This was very intentional, since this sequence placed E closer to C which allows the M3 to beat more slowly, in some cases making a nearly P3. Well temperaments usually prioritize nearly P3rds in the keys closer to C in the circle of 5ths, such as G and F, all of which keys were considered the most consonant, not because of P5s but because of the 3rds. 3rds were in fact foundational to western music as we know it, and the most consonant keys had the most tempered fifths.

    The statement "perfect 5ths are essential for building chords" is not correct. While 5ths are essential, P5s are not as I have demonstrated above. Even the relatively rapidly beating G-D in Kirnberger III is partially masked by the 3rd in a G major triad.

    In functional harmony, it is correct to see significance in the Tonic/Dominant (I/V) relationship, but again this is not a necessarily a P5 relationship. Further, it is not so much the fifth comprising the root of the dominant chord that creates tension, but the tritone which is created from the 5th and 7th partials of the dominant root. This translates primarily to the 3rd and 7th (i.e. 3rd from the root and a 3rd from the 5th) of the chord being the primarily creators of tension that "want" to resolve back to the tonic (I).

    For these reasons, I do not recommend P12 tuning universally, especially for classical music. P12 tuning by necessity makes faster beating 3rds which I believe I have given a sufficient argument as to their historic importance in the development of western music. Functional harmony depends on 5ths for certain, but the P5s as you stated in the OP are not necessary for functional harmony at all. Since they are not necessary for functional harmony, P12 tuning is not necessarily the best tuning for western music.



    ------------------------------
    Tim Foster RPT
    New Oxford PA
    (470) 231-6074
    ------------------------------



  • 19.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-15-2024 20:49

    Tim,

    Thanks for reposting, as yours was simply taken down by the 'system' when it was following one that was taken down for not being on point.

    That being said, I encourage you to post all UT preference opinions on the new thread by S. Rosenthal, which he humorously and appropriately entitled "A Tempermental Journey." This is a great new place for the UT guys, since it is a very small minority who want UT on a modern concert grand piano. To each his own.

    There is room at the table for all here! I respect that, but also adhere to the 150-year-old tradition of the move toward atonality that Liszt and Wagner started and matured around the turn of 1900 with the New Viennese School of composers. The German tuners had, by historic accounts, already embraced ET by 1850 and some say the English tuners even before that. I love the sound of Rubinstein, Horowitz, Bronfman, Argerich, Hamlin, and all the 'greats' of prior and recent who play the full range of literature on great-sounding ET tunings on fabulous Steinway D's. So, ET is here to stay, and I don't see serious pianists turning back the clock to pre-1850. 

    On a personal 'note', my Fazioli sounds to the ears of everyone who has been in the room, 'the best sounding tuning they have ever heard' and that came from 4 tuners each with over 35 years of high-level tuning history. It simply came from Pure12th being spot on using the 'new technology'. I can play literature from Bach to Bartok and it all comes off well. Everything is unbiased and consonant sounding. It sounds 'mainstream.'

    Respectfully, 

    Steve N.



    ------------------------------
    Steven Norsworthy
    PianoSens
    Cardiff By The Sea CA
    (619) 964-0101
    ------------------------------



  • 20.  RE: It's All About the Perfect 5th! A Musicological Perspective

    Posted 05-16-2024 07:12
    Steven - the problem is that whilst ET is a compromise that hasn't been _very_ bad for over 100 years leading to de facto adoption, what you propose and with self professed "Musicological" authority and therefore with academic implication, is that only perfect 5ths are required for harmony and that therefore P12 stretching is proper and acceptable and leading to near Pythagorean major thirds which are not acceptable and especially when there aren't softer thirds to relieve them in the tuning system. This is plainly wrong.

    Any good ideas should be capable of peer review and withstand debate. 

    The whole purpose of enjoining in discussion in a forum is for debate to bring in other ideas and to move a perspective forward and progress both learning and understanding. 

    That the universal presence of Pythagorean thirds is unacceptable led naturally to the suggestion that UT could overcome the disadvantage. 

    Instead you require anyone who calls you out on mistaken assertions, whether that 
    - Prokofiev requires Equal Temperament to be used, or that 
    - only 5ths are required for harmony, or 
    - that Pythagorean 3rds throughout the key spectrum are acceptable without relief of smoother thirds,
    you expect to go away elsewhere and leave your self-professed and mistaken authority unchallenged.

    That it should be unchallenged and unchallengeable is unprofessional as well as misleading to those new to understanding of tuning and who should not be misled.

    As this is a professional forum from which people new to piano tuning subjects can expect reliable information, it is professionally inappropriate for a thread of professional standing purporting "Musicological" authority not to contain contributions from people with other professional and academic experience.

    Rather than obstinately holding to foundations which do not bear scrutiny and complaining about anyone who says so, perhaps you might profit from the development of the thread as it was before you required any relevant suggestions to be deleted, finding a new and expanded usefulness for your commercial device in the directions which have been indicated. Working together with Ron Koval could be particularly productive as his tuning requires ETD assistance and therefore gives a place for your technology. P12 ET tuning is not the only context from which you can profit.  

    Best wishes

    David P




    --
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    David Pinnegar, B.Sc., A.R.C.S.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    +44 1342 850594